此外，董事会已决议委任安永会计师事务所("安永")为公司新核数师，以填补德勤辞任后的临时空缺。 安永将任职直至公司下届股东周年大会结束为止。 格隆汇10月10日丨上海实业控股(00363.HK)发布公告，由于公司连续委聘德勤•关黄陈方会计师行("德 勤")的年期已经达到规定年限，公司已知会德勤更换核数师的规定。经审慎考虑后，德勤认为董事会决 定委聘继任核数师，已导致德勤与公司的专业关系难以维持。因此，德勤已决定提呈辞任公司核数师， 自2025年10月10日起生效。 ...

文/梧桐数据中心 2025年1-9月，A股共有78家公司上市，其中沪市主板17家、科创板8家、深市主板9家、创业板29家、 北交所15家，相较去年同期的69家，同比增长13.04%。这78家新上市公司的IPO中介机构收费共计55.99 亿元，其中承销保荐费38.84亿元，律师费5.64亿元，审计费11.51亿元。承销保荐收费总额排名第一的 是国泰海通，5.01亿元，业务单数9单；律师收费总额排名第一的是上海锦天城，0.89亿元，业务单数13 单；审计收费总额排名第一的是容诚，2.70亿元，业务单数19单。 （各板块中介机构IPO业务收费金额及占比情况） 承销保荐费平均单费最高的板块为科创板，6896.23万元，最低为北交所，平均单费2411.65万元；律师 费平均单费最高的板块为沪主板，837.58万元，最低为北交所，平均单费391.07 万元；审计费平均单费 最高的板块为沪主板，1990.73万元，最低为北交所，平均单费667.14万元。 单位：万元 （各板块中介机构IPO业务平均单费情况） 二、承销保荐收费 一、各板块情况 按照板块业务划分，承销保荐业务收费总额从高到低分别为：创业板、沪主板、科创板、深主 ...

针对上市公司、行业机构及中介机构，吴清提出新的期望： 聚焦主业、强化功能、完善治 理，不断提升专业能力与市场声誉，持续培育尊重投资者、回报投资者的市场文化 ，在资本 市场改革发展中实现自身的高质量发展。 记者丨崔文静 编辑丨巫燕玲 根据证监会9月30日官网消息，证监会在京召开"十五五"资本市场规划上市公司和行业机构座 谈会，座谈会由证监会党委书记、主席吴清主持，部分上市公司、行业机构、中介机构代表及 中国资本市场学会会员参会并深入交流。 会上， 吴清主席强调了六个"坚持" ，即坚持党的全面领导、坚持人民至上、坚持高质量 发展、坚持全面深化改革、坚持有效市场与有为政府更好结合、坚持统筹发展与安全，以 此高质量推进"十五五"资本市场规划的制定与实施。 吴清同时明确， 要以科创板、创业板"两创板"改革为抓手 ，进一步深化投融资综合改 革，全面推进新一轮资本市场改革开放，持续提升市场的吸引力、包容性与竞争力。 三是支持优质证券基金公司等行业机构打造一流投行和投资机构，推动会计师事务所、律师事 务所等中介机构高质量发展，加快提升综合实力与国际竞争力； 四是进一步丰富A股市场指数、ETF、衍生品等产品体系，更好服务居民财 ...

欢迎扫描下方二维码关注： 关于印发《会计师事务所反洗钱工作管理办法》的通知 财会〔2025〕20号 各省、自治区、直辖市财政厅（局），深圳市财政局，新疆生产建设兵团财政局，中国人民银行上海总部及各省、自治区、直辖市、计 划单列市分行，各会计师事务所，有关单位： 为加强和规范会计师事务所依法履行反洗钱义务，根据《中华人民共和国反洗钱法》等有关规定，我们制定了《会计师事务所反洗钱工 作管理办法》，现予印发，请遵照执行。 财政部 中国人民银行 2025年9月3日 附件下载： 附件：会计师事务所反洗钱工作管理办法.pdf 第一条 根据《中华人民共和国反洗钱法》(以下简称反洗 钱法)等法律法规，为加强和规范会计师事务所依法履行反洗钱 义务，制定本办 法。 第二条 在中华人民共和国境内依法设立的会计师事务所， 从事涉及反洗钱法第六十四条第二项规定业务的，应当根据反洗 钱法和本办 法规定履行反洗钱义务，并接受监督管理。 第三条 国务院财政部门履行全国会计师事务所反洗钱监督 管理职责，会同国务院反洗钱行政主管部门研究解决会计师事务 所反洗钱工 作中的重大问题。省级财政部门履行本行政区域内会 计师事务所反洗钱监督管理职责。注册 ...

Core Viewpoint - Private equity (PE) funds are increasingly investing in accounting firms globally, with half of the top 30 accounting firms in the U.S. accepting such investments to cover high costs associated with AI and other technologies [2][4]. Group 1: Investment Trends - In the U.S., Wipfli accounting firm announced it will accept an investment from New Mountain Capital, with the firm's economic value exceeding $1 billion and the fund's stake being approximately 40% [4]. - A survey by Koltin Consulting Group indicates that by 2025, 15 out of the top 30 accounting firms in the U.S. will have accepted private equity investments [4]. - In the UK, a survey by Kingsley Napley found that 27% of the 22 surveyed major accounting firms have accepted private equity funding [4]. Group 2: Structural Changes - Traditionally, accounting firms relied on personal investments from partners, with few examples of public listings [4]. - Private equity funds aim to recover their investments through options such as resale to other funds or initial public offerings (IPOs) [4]. - Restructuring through AI investments or mergers and acquisitions (M&A) can enhance economic value, allowing for profitable exits [4]. Group 3: Concerns and Regulatory Perspectives - There are concerns that accepting private equity funding may undermine the audit independence of accounting firms, as highlighted by executives from large auditing companies [5]. - In Japan, legal restrictions currently limit investments in audit firms to individual certified public accountants and tax accountants, suggesting that this trend may not extend to Japan [4][5].

Group 1 - The Hong Kong Accounting and Financial Reporting Council (AFRC) imposed penalties totaling HKD 1.912 million on Deloitte, Wang Tianze, and Mai Zhilong for multiple audit deficiencies related to revenue recognition and other violations [1] - Deloitte was responsible for the audit reports of Tianhe Chemical Group Limited and its subsidiaries for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012, and 2013, as well as for Sander International Limited and its subsidiaries for the years ending December 31, 2012, and 2013 [1] - The AFRC found that the auditors failed to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence and lacked professional skepticism in addressing significant misstatement risks related to revenue [1] Group 2 - All three regulated parties admitted their violations and engaged in early settlement discussions with the AFRC, resulting in a 20% reduction in penalties for each case due to their cooperative attitude [2] - The final penalties were HKD 1.16 million for Deloitte, HKD 416,000 for Wang Tianze, and HKD 336,000 for Mai Zhilong [2] - This case marks the first disciplinary actions completed through cross-border regulatory cooperation, supported by the Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China, which involved obtaining audit working papers from the mainland [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong Accounting and Financial Reporting Council (AFRC) has publicly reprimanded Deloitte, along with two partners, for multiple audit deficiencies related to revenue recognition in the audits of two former Hong Kong-listed companies, Tianhe Group and Sander International Group, resulting in a total fine of HKD 1,912,000 [1][2] Group 1: Audit Findings - The AFRC identified significant deficiencies in the audit procedures of Deloitte, including failures in revenue recognition and external confirmation processes, which led to insufficient audit evidence and a lack of professional skepticism regarding significant misstatement risks related to revenue [2][4] - Specific deficiencies included inadequate assessment of internal controls related to revenue cycles, failure to ensure the completeness of sales in testing, and not obtaining critical evidence for goods delivery and customer acceptance [4][5] Group 2: Tianhe Group Audit - Tianhe Group, primarily engaged in the production and sale of fine chemical products, had its revenue overstated by approximately 54% in its IPO prospectus, with sales figures for 2011, 2012, and 2013 reported as RMB 32 billion, 40.9 billion, and 48.4 billion, respectively [3][6] - Deloitte and partner Wang were responsible for auditing Tianhe Group's financial information for the fiscal years 2011, 2012, and 2013, where revenue was identified as a significant risk area with potential for material misstatement due to fraud [3][6] Group 3: Sander International Group Audit - Sander International Group, involved in water supply and sewage treatment, had its bank balances overstated by approximately RMB 2.1 billion and 2.7 billion for the years 2012 and 2013, respectively [6] - Deloitte and partner Mai conducted the audits for Sander International Group for the fiscal years 2012 and 2013, where significant misstatement risks were identified in revenue and bank balances [6]

Group 1 - The company announced the reappointment of Daixin Certified Public Accountants (Special General Partnership) for the audit of its financial report and internal control for the year 2025 [2]

Core Insights - The accounting firms have become a focal point of capital market regulation since 2025, with a significant increase in penalties imposed by regulatory bodies [1][2] - A total of 38 accounting firms received 149 penalties amounting to 150.3 million yuan, representing a 44.7% increase compared to the same period last year [1][2][4] Regulatory Environment - The regulatory environment has intensified, with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and exchanges issuing numerous penalties to accounting firms, reflecting a commitment to maintaining market order [1][2] - The revised "Management Measures for the Record-Filing of Accounting Firms Engaging in Securities Services" aims to enhance quality management and professional responsibility among accounting firms [8] Penalty Statistics - The top five accounting firms by penalty count include: - Dahua CPA: 12 penalties (8.05%) - Tianjian CPA: 11 penalties (7.38%) - Daxin CPA: 10 penalties (6.71%) - Lixin CPA: 10 penalties (6.71%) - Xinyong Zhonghe CPA: 9 penalties (6.04%) [3] - In terms of penalty amounts, Tianheng CPA and Daxin CPA faced fines exceeding 30 million yuan, while others like Zhonghua CPA and Dahua CPA were fined over 10 million yuan [4] Industry Challenges - The auditing industry is grappling with balancing market competition and quality assurance, with some firms engaging in price competition that undermines audit independence [7] - Key areas needing improvement include revenue recognition, related party transactions, and asset impairment, indicating a need for enhanced standardization and risk management [7] Future Directions - The industry is encouraged to adopt a three-pronged approach: market-based pricing, penetrating regulation, and ecological restructuring to improve audit quality [11] - Suggestions include establishing a pricing guidance system, mandatory audit liability insurance, and a dual-signature system for audit reports to enhance accountability [11] Collaborative Efforts - Healthy industry development requires collaboration among various stakeholders, including listed companies improving governance, intermediaries maintaining professional integrity, and regulators refining oversight mechanisms [12]

Core Viewpoint - Dongxing Securities plans to reappoint KPMG Huazhen as its accounting firm for the fiscal year 2025, following a thorough review by the board and audit committee [1][6]. Group 1: Accounting Firm Information - KPMG Huazhen was established on August 18, 1992, in Beijing and officially began operations on August 1, 2012 [1]. - As of December 31, 2024, KPMG Huazhen has 241 partners and 1,309 registered accountants, with over 300 accountants having signed securities service audit reports [2]. - KPMG Huazhen's audited total business revenue for 2024 exceeded RMB 4.1 billion, with audit service revenue surpassing RMB 4 billion [2]. Group 2: Audit Client Information - In 2024, KPMG Huazhen audited 127 listed companies, generating total audit fees of approximately RMB 682 million [3]. - The industries of these listed companies include manufacturing, finance, transportation, real estate, and more [3]. - KPMG Huazhen has a cumulative professional insurance compensation limit and risk fund exceeding RMB 200 million, complying with legal regulations [3]. Group 3: Audit Team Information - The project partner and signing registered accountants for the 2025 audit include Guan Yiming, Bai Long, and Cheng Hailiang, all of whom have not faced any criminal or administrative penalties in the past three years [4][5]. - The audit service fee for 2025 is set at RMB 1.57 million, consistent with the fees from 2024 [5]. Group 4: Appointment Process - The audit committee reviewed KPMG Huazhen's qualifications and recommended its reappointment based on its professional competence and integrity [6]. - The board of directors approved the appointment with a unanimous vote of 15 in favor [6]. - The appointment is subject to approval by the shareholders' meeting and will take effect upon approval [6].