中经记者 封莉 北京报道 2月26日，最高人民法院刑四庭副庭长司明灯在最高法新闻发布会上表示，目前，最高法正在调研起草 关于审理敲诈勒索刑事案件的意见。《关于审理诈骗刑事案件的意见》目前正在征求意见中，将适时发 布。 据了解，近年来，全国各级人民法院持续加大对侵犯财产犯罪的打击力度。2021年至2025年，人民法院 新收一审侵犯财产犯罪案件127.3万件，审结127.1万件，有力打击和遏制了此类犯罪高发、多发态势。 刑法上的侵犯财产犯罪，是指刑法分则第五章所规定的抢劫、盗窃、诈骗、抢夺、聚众哄抢、侵占、职 务侵占、挪用资金、挪用特定款物、敲诈勒索、故意毁坏财物、破坏生产经营、拒不支付劳动报酬等13 种犯罪。侵犯财产犯罪案件历来在人民法院审理的全部刑事案件中占比很大，同时法律适用问题也相对 复杂。 侵犯财产犯罪总量下降，但新型犯罪挑战凸显 据司明灯介绍，五年来，全国侵犯财产犯罪案件数量呈现出疫情期间骤降，疫情后回升，再逐渐回落的 趋势。2021年一审收案27.9万件，2022年降到20.2万件，之后两年分别上升至24.8万件、28.3万件，去年 又降至27万件。从近十年看，我国侵犯财产案件收案量从2016年的3 ...

最高人民法院刑四庭副庭长司明灯表示，近年来诈骗犯罪手段多样化、智能化特征日趋明显。一方面， 虚假投资理财、虚假销售、冒充客服等诈骗模式仍在高发。另一方面，采用新兴技术，变换诈骗手法 和"话术"，新诈骗手段层出不穷且呈现智能化趋势，AI换脸、深度伪造等前沿科技被应用于诈骗场景 中。 2月26日，最高人民法院举行新闻发布会。发布会公布的信息显示，当前科技的不当应用成为诈骗犯罪 升级的重要推手，诈骗犯罪手段多样化、智能化特征日趋明显。 值得注意的是，智能化趋势在相关的上下游犯罪中同样有所体现，犯罪分子通过"引流脚本""推广神 器"等黑产智能工具，以虚假宣传、利益诱惑、情感欺骗等方式传播诈骗信息，低成本、高效率地筛选 潜在被害人，导致诈骗犯罪隐蔽性更强、得逞率更高。 2025年，最高人民法院刑四庭专门成立了侵犯财产类犯罪法律适用研究专班，下设诈骗、盗窃、敲诈勒 索、侵占、职务侵占、掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得等犯罪调研小组。针对诈骗犯罪在实践中出现的新情况、新 特点，专班充分发挥法答网、案例库效能，对有关问题及时进行梳理、答疑。经过充分调研论证，起草 了《关于审理诈骗刑事案件的意见》，目前正在征求意见中。 数据显示，2021年 ...

针对诈骗犯罪在实践中出现的新情况、新特点，司明灯介绍，最高人民法院高度重视解决，充分发挥法答网、案 例库效能，对有关问题及时进行梳理、答疑。经过充分调研论证，起草了《关于审理诈骗刑事案件的意见》，目 前正在征求意见中，将适时发布，以指导全国法院在办理诈骗犯罪案件中全面准确贯彻宽严相济刑事政策，突出 打击重点，严格区分民事欺诈与刑事犯罪、此罪与彼罪，加大财产刑适用力度，最大限度做好追赃挽损，最大限 度维护人民群众财产安全。 （文章来源：南方都市报） 司明灯介绍，多年来，诈骗犯罪始终居于人民法院新收刑事案件的前五位。2021年至2025年，人民法院一审新收 诈骗刑事案件从2022年最低5.2万件震荡上升至2024年的9.4万件，2025年也达到9.3万件。五年间，最高与最低年 份收案数相比增长了81.2%，而同期全国法院一审新收刑事案件数量则呈现出下降趋势。 司明灯表示，在数量持续增长、保持高位运行的同时，近年来诈骗犯罪手段多样化、智能化特征日趋明显。一方 面，虚假投资理财、虚假销售、冒充客服等诈骗模式仍在高发。另一方面，采用新兴技术，变换诈骗手法和"话 术"，新诈骗手段层出不穷且呈现智能化趋势，AI换脸、深度伪 ...

责任编辑：秦艺 2月26日金融一线消息，最高人民法院举行新闻发布会，通报了依法惩处侵犯财产犯罪、积极加强诈骗 犯罪惩治、精准打击掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得犯罪等相关工作情况。2021年至2025年，人民法院新收一审侵 犯财产犯罪案件127.3万件，审结127.1万件，有力打击和遏制了侵犯财产犯罪高发、多发态势，有效维 护了人民群众财产安全。多年来，诈骗犯罪始终居于人民法院新收刑事案件的前五位。2021年至2025 年，人民法院一审新收诈骗刑事案件从2022年最低5.2万件震荡上升至2024年的9.4万件，2025年也达到 9.3万件。此外，2021年至2025年，人民法院一审受理掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得案28.6万件，审结28.5万件， 充分彰显人民法院对洗钱变现行为依法从严打击的鲜明态度。 2月26日金融一线消息，最高人民法院举行新闻发布会，通报了依法惩处侵犯财产犯罪、积极加强诈骗 犯罪惩治、精准打击掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得犯罪等相关工作情况。2021年至2025年，人民法院新收一审侵 犯财产犯罪案件127.3万件，审结127.1万件，有力打击和遏制了侵犯财产犯罪高发、多发态势，有效维 护了人民群众财产安全。多年来，诈骗犯罪始 ...

（来源：河北新闻网） 【#1年用水400吨民警揪出在逃诈骗犯#】#在逃诈骗犯压力大靠洗衣机声入睡# 法治日报1月30日披露一 起案件：一户登记只有两人居住的住户，一年却用了400多吨水。异常的用水量，引起物业工作人员注 意，于是将情况反映给山西省太原市公安局万柏林分局兴华派出所民警。民警抽丝剥茧，将一名在逃数 年的诈骗嫌疑人抓获，揭开了这户人家用水量奇高的秘密。结果显示老人的儿子刘某，是被忻州警方上 网追逃的诈骗案嫌疑人。追逃资料显示，刘某数年前以找工作为诱饵，诈骗他人20万元后，一直在逃。 原来，他诈骗案发潜逃后，便和母亲租住在这里，他知道民警在追查他，因此不敢用手机，也不敢到需 要登记身份证的地方打工，只敢去小饭店打些零工，收入微薄。因为精神压力过大，每到夜晚，刘某总 是辗转反侧，白天在家时也精神恍惚。后来，刘某发现听到洗衣机工作时发出的声音能让自己的情绪平 稳许多，并且还能助眠，于是只要在家便不停地用洗衣机清洗衣物和床单被罩。有的衣物还没等晾干， 便又被他扔进了洗衣机，这才导致用水量飙升，露出了马脚。目前，刘某已被移交忻州警方作进一步处 理。 转自：河北新闻网 ...

Core Viewpoint - A 35-year-old woman, Wang, was arrested for committing fraud by impersonating a leader from Shaanxi Province, scamming victims out of a total of approximately 4.24 million RMB [1] Summary by Relevant Sections Fraud Details - The suspect, Wang, posed as a government official and claimed she could facilitate the employment of victims' children as civil servants, leading to a significant scam totaling over 4.24 million RMB from one victim [1] - In addition to the main scam, Wang also defrauded two other victims under the pretense of purchasing "top-up housing," amounting to 580,000 RMB and 800,000 RMB respectively [1] Legal Consequences - Wang has been criminally detained by the police, and the case is under further investigation [1] - According to Article 266 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, the penalties for fraud vary based on the amount involved, with significant penalties for larger sums [1]

Group 1 - The article highlights the efforts of the Salt Lake Public Security Bureau in combating fraud and maintaining social stability by focusing on public safety and cracking down on crimes such as theft and scams [1][3] - A significant case was reported where a suspect named Wang, a 35-year-old woman from Shanxi Province, was arrested for defrauding victims by posing as a provincial leader, resulting in a total fraud amount exceeding 4.24 million RMB [1][4] - The suspect also deceived two other victims under the pretense of purchasing "top-up houses," collecting 580,000 RMB and 800,000 RMB from them respectively [1][4] Group 2 - The suspect Wang has been criminally detained, and the investigation is ongoing, reflecting the commitment of the Salt Lake Public Security Bureau to uphold law and order [3] - The article emphasizes the importance of addressing both major and minor cases to enhance public safety and instill a sense of security among the community [4] - Legal consequences for fraud are outlined, indicating that significant fraud can lead to imprisonment ranging from three years to life, depending on the severity of the case [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a fraudulent scheme involving a restaurant owner in Shanghai who exploited the "Le Pin Shanghai" electronic consumption vouchers to illegally obtain government subsidies through false transactions [1][2][3]. Group 1: Fraudulent Activities - The restaurant owner, Zhao, engaged in fraudulent activities by creating fake dining orders to redeem government subsidies associated with the consumption vouchers [1][2]. - Zhao used a strategy of issuing suspiciously high orders, such as "1000 portions of rice" for a nominal price, to facilitate the voucher redemption process [2]. - He illegally profited from the government subsidies by splitting the benefits with sellers of the vouchers, earning between 190 to 250 yuan per transaction [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The case was transferred to the Baoshan District Procuratorate for prosecution after Zhao was apprehended by law enforcement [2][3]. - The procuratorate conducted a thorough examination of evidence, including transaction records and communication logs, to establish the fraudulent nature of Zhao's activities [2]. - Zhao was charged with fraud for illegally obtaining over 110,000 yuan through the redemption of more than 390 fake vouchers, and he has agreed to return the illicit gains [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - A young individual, Song, committed fraud by deceiving friends to cover debts, leading to a conviction for fraud and a prison sentence of four years along with a fine of 20,000 yuan and restitution of over 120,000 yuan to victims [1][2] Group 1: Fraud Scheme Details - Song accumulated significant debt due to extravagant spending, owing friends, including Li, tens of thousands of yuan [1] - To repay Li, Song devised a scheme involving fake cash, using 600,000 yuan worth of point-counting practice vouchers disguised as cash, claiming he needed to mortgage it temporarily [1] - Song misled Li into believing he had a large amount of US dollars to exchange, offering a favorable exchange rate of 5.5 yuan per dollar, which led to further deception involving a business partner, Zou [1][2] Group 2: Legal Proceedings - After Li discovered the deception when opening the mortgaged cash, he alerted Zou, who then confronted Song and reported him to the police [2] - The case was forwarded to the local prosecutor's office, which determined that Song's actions constituted fraud, leading to formal charges [2] - The court ultimately sentenced Song to four years in prison and mandated restitution to the victims, along with the confiscation of fraudulent items [1][2]

Group 1 - A 90-year-old man was scammed out of 20,000 yuan by individuals posing as his grandson and a lawyer, claiming his grandson needed bail money after being arrested [1][3] - The scam involved a series of phone calls where the scammers created a sense of urgency, leading the elderly man to withdraw cash and hand it over to a person who came to collect it [1][3] - After realizing the scam, the man's son reported the incident to the police, who quickly identified and apprehended the suspect who collected the cash [1][3] Group 2 - The suspect, identified as Huang, admitted to handing over the stolen cash to three accomplices, who were also later arrested, with a total of 145,000 yuan seized by the police [3][5] - All four suspects were from outside the province and were recruited by an overseas scam group, lured by high-paying "runner" jobs [5][7] - The police have issued warnings about the risks of participating in money transfer schemes, emphasizing that such actions can lead to severe legal consequences [7]