Group 1 - The core point of the article is the early resignation of Nestlé's chairman Paul Bulcke, which reflects investor dissatisfaction with the company's leadership and management direction [2][5][7] - Paul Bulcke's departure was accelerated by seven months due to investor impatience, particularly regarding his leniency towards former CEO Mark Schneider and hesitance during the Laurent Freixe scandal [2][5] - Nestlé has experienced frequent management changes in recent years, indicating a conflict between the need for innovative business development and a conservative financial approach [2][5] Group 2 - Large investors have expressed dissatisfaction with Nestlé's current leadership, contributing to Paul Bulcke's early exit [5] - Historically, Nestlé has maintained a conservative financial style, which has been challenged by recent capital actions and management decisions [5][6] - Under Mark Schneider's leadership, Nestlé's stock price rose significantly, but this was accompanied by increased debt levels, with net debt/EBITDA rising from 1.8x in 2020 to 3.0x in 2024, a 66.7% increase [6] Group 3 - Paul Bulcke's early resignation was somewhat anticipated, as his internal standing had been gradually weakened, evidenced by a drop in shareholder support from 96% in 2017 to 84.8% in 2023 [10][11] - Pablo Isla, the incoming chairman, has a strong background in retail and previously led Inditex, where he oversaw significant expansion [12] - The challenge for Pablo Isla will be to balance Nestlé's traditional conservative financial approach with the urgent need for transformation and growth in profitability [13]