Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the auction of the Ming Dynasty painting "Jiangnan Spring" by Qiu Ying, which was previously donated to the Nanjing Museum, has raised significant public concern and prompted an investigation by the National Cultural Heritage Administration [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The Nanjing Museum received a donation of 137 ancient paintings from the descendants of renowned collector Pang Laichen in 1959, but five of these paintings, including "Jiangnan Spring," were reported missing [1]. - The painting "Jiangnan Spring" was recently appraised at 88 million yuan and appeared in an auction preview in Beijing, leading to its withdrawal after intervention from the cultural heritage authorities [1][2]. - Pang Shuling, a descendant of Pang Laichen, has filed a court application for the museum to provide detailed records of the missing paintings' whereabouts [1]. Group 2: Museum's Response - The Nanjing Museum acknowledged receiving court materials regarding a "donation contract dispute" and confirmed the donation of 137 paintings in January 1959 [2]. - The five disputed paintings were identified as forgeries by expert groups in 1961 and 1964, and the museum disposed of them in accordance with the "Museum Collection Management Measures" in the 1990s [2]. - The museum is currently investigating the whereabouts of the five disputed paintings and will cooperate with authorities if any illegal actions are found during the disposal process [2]. Group 3: Historical Context - Historical records indicate that the Nanjing Museum followed the "Museum Collection Management Measures" established in June 1986 to review and dispose of paintings deemed unsuitable for collection [3]. - The painting "Jiangnan Spring" was confirmed as a forgery and was transferred to the Jiangsu Provincial Cultural Department for disposal, eventually sold for 6,800 yuan in 2001 [3]. - Pang Shuling and her legal representatives argue that as descendants of the donor, they have the right to know the fate of the donated items and criticize the museum for not informing them about the disposal process [3]. Group 4: Government Involvement - The Jiangsu Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism has established a task force to investigate the incident and will take appropriate legal actions if any violations are found [4].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal dispute between the descendants of collector Pang Laichen and the Nanjing Museum regarding the "donation contract" has garnered significant attention, particularly concerning the authenticity of artworks previously donated and later deemed "forgeries" by the museum [1]. Group 1: Legal Dispute and Artworks - The Nanjing Museum has been accused of mishandling artworks donated by Pang Laichen's descendants, including the "Jiangnan Spring" scroll and the "Double Horse" painting by Zhao Guangfu, which were later classified as "forgeries" [1][6]. - In 2024, Pang's descendants filed a lawsuit against the Nanjing Museum to ascertain the status of the donated artworks, leading to a court order for the museum to allow inspection of the original pieces by June 30, 2025 [6]. - The museum's response indicated that five artworks, including the "Jiangnan Spring" and "Double Horse," were unaccounted for and had been processed as "forgeries" [6]. Group 2: Auction Details and Artwork Provenance - The "Double Horse" painting was auctioned at the Shanghai Jiatai Auction Company on June 18, 2014, with a final sale price of 2.3 million RMB, despite its controversial status [5][7]. - The painting features seals from Pang Yuanji and Lai Chen, linking it to the Pang family, but current evidence does not conclusively prove that this auctioned piece is the same as the one donated to the museum [7]. - Historical records from the Nanjing Museum indicate that the "Double Horse" was part of a batch of artworks deemed unsuitable for collection and subsequently transferred to the provincial cultural authority for processing [5].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the appearance of a Ming Dynasty painting, "Jiangnan Spring," at an auction, which was previously donated to the Nanjing Museum by the descendants of collector Pang Laichen, has raised public attention and scrutiny [1][2]. Group 1: Background of the Controversy - The painting "Jiangnan Spring" was recently valued at 88 million yuan during an art auction in Beijing [1]. - Pang Shuling, the granddaughter of Pang Laichen, has filed a lawsuit against the Nanjing Museum regarding the donation agreement [1]. Group 2: Nanjing Museum's Response - On December 17, 2025, the Nanjing Museum issued a statement addressing media reports about the painting's auction appearance [2]. - The museum received two court documents regarding the "donation contract dispute" from Pang Shuling since November 2024 [2]. - The museum confirmed that it officially received 137 paintings from Pang Zenghe (Pang Shuling's father) in January 1959, and the five disputed paintings were identified as "forgeries" by expert groups in 1961 and 1964 [2]. - The museum disposed of these five paintings in accordance with the "Museum Collection Management Measures" in the 1990s [2]. - The museum is currently cooperating with the ongoing legal proceedings and will investigate the whereabouts of the disputed paintings [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Nanjing Museum is addressing media reports regarding the appearance of a Ming Dynasty painting by Qiu Ying in the auction market, which has raised public concern. The museum is currently involved in legal proceedings related to a gift contract dispute and is conducting an investigation into the matter [1]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Since November 2024, the museum has received two court documents regarding a lawsuit from Ms. Pang Shuling concerning a "gift contract dispute" [1]. - The museum is taking the matter seriously and has initiated an investigation to verify the claims [1]. Group 2: Artwork Authentication - In January 1959, the museum officially received 137 paintings donated by Mr. Pang Zenghe, Ms. Pang Shuling's father [1]. - The five disputed paintings mentioned in the reports were identified as "forgeries" by expert groups in 1961 and 1964 [1]. - In the 1990s, the museum disposed of these five paintings in accordance with the "Museum Collection Management Measures" [1]. Group 3: Future Actions - The museum will actively cooperate with the ongoing legal proceedings and will further investigate the whereabouts of the five disputed paintings [1]. - If any illegal or irregular actions are found during the disposal process, the museum will work with relevant authorities to handle the situation according to the law [1]. - The authenticity of the painting "Jiangnan Spring" that appeared in the auction market is still under investigation [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Nanjing Museum is currently involved in a legal dispute regarding the donation of five controversial paintings, which were previously identified as forgeries, and is actively investigating their provenance and management practices [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Since November 2024, the museum has received two court documents related to a "donation contract dispute" involving Ms. Pang Shuling [1][5]. - The museum is cooperating with the ongoing legal proceedings and will investigate the whereabouts of the five disputed paintings [3][6]. Group 2: Historical Context - In January 1959, the museum officially received a donation of 137 paintings from Mr. Pang Zenghe, Ms. Pang Shuling's father [1][5]. - The five controversial paintings were identified as "forgeries" by expert groups in 1961 and 1964, and were disposed of in the 1990s according to museum collection management regulations [1][5]. Group 3: Future Actions - The museum plans to strengthen the management of donated items and museum collections [3][6]. - There is an ongoing investigation to determine if the painting "Jiangnan Spring," which appeared at an auction in Beijing with an estimated value of 88 million yuan, is one of the donated works [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - The Nanjing Museum is addressing media concerns regarding the appearance of a Ming Dynasty painting by Qiu Ying in the auction market, linked to a legal dispute over a donation contract involving Ms. Pang Shuling [1] Group 1: Legal Context - Since November 2024, the museum has received two court documents related to a lawsuit concerning a "donation contract dispute" involving Ms. Pang Shuling [1] - The museum is taking the matter seriously and has initiated an investigation into the claims [1] Group 2: Historical Background - In January 1959, the museum officially received 137 paintings donated by Mr. Pang Zenghe, Ms. Pang Shuling's father [1] - The five disputed paintings mentioned in the media were identified as "forgeries" by expert groups in 1961 and 1964 [1] Group 3: Current Actions and Future Steps - The museum has disposed of the five disputed paintings in accordance with the "Museum Collection Management Measures" in the 1990s [1] - The museum is currently cooperating with the ongoing legal proceedings and will investigate the whereabouts of the disputed paintings [1] - If any illegal actions are found during the disposal process, the museum will work with relevant authorities for serious handling [1] - Further verification is needed to determine if the painting "Jiangnan Spring" appearing in the auction market is part of the donated collection [1]