Core Viewpoint - The recent auction of the painting "Jiangnan Spring," donated by the descendants of Pang Laishen to the Nanjing Museum, has sparked significant public interest and concern regarding the handling and provenance of cultural relics [1][20]. Group 1: Investigation and Response - The National Cultural Heritage Administration has formed a working group to investigate the circumstances surrounding the auction of "Jiangnan Spring" and other related issues [1][20]. - Jiangsu provincial authorities have established an investigation team to examine the management and security of donated cultural relics at the Nanjing Museum, with a commitment to address any illegal activities found [1][20]. Group 2: Auction Details and Provenance - The painting "Jiangnan Spring" was sold for 88 million yuan at auction, raising questions about its ownership and the identity of the seller, initially believed to be a local collector, Lu Ting, but later revealed to be a buyer named Zhu Guang from Ningbo [1][20]. - The Nanjing Museum had previously sold a painting identified as a forgery for 6,800 yuan in 2001, which has led to scrutiny over the ambiguous designation of "customer" on the sales receipt [3][5]. Group 3: Key Individuals and Relationships - Xu Huping, the former deputy director of the Nanjing Museum, played a crucial role in the approval and sale of the painting, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest due to his close relationship with Lu Ting [5][10]. - Lu Ting, a prominent collector, had a significant impact on the local art scene and was known for his extensive collection, including "Jiangnan Spring," which he acquired in the 1990s [7][10]. Group 4: Legal and Ethical Considerations - The descendants of Pang Laishen argue that the Nanjing Museum's actions in selling the painting without proper notification to the original donors violate ethical standards and legal obligations [24][26]. - Legal experts suggest that the original donation agreement may provide grounds for the Pang family to reclaim the painting, especially given the museum's failure to uphold its promise to preserve the artwork [30][34]. Group 5: Cultural Significance and Historical Context - "Jiangnan Spring" is not only valued for its artistic merit but also for its historical significance, having been part of a well-documented lineage of ownership among notable collectors [42][43]. - The case highlights broader issues within the cultural heritage sector regarding the management and ethical treatment of donated artworks, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in museum practices [44].

Group 1 - The National Cultural Heritage Administration has taken the recent media reports regarding the "Nanjing Museum's 'Spring in Jiangnan' scroll appearing in the auction market" seriously and has established a working group to address the situation [1]

Group 1 - Recent issues regarding the management of cultural relics at the Nanjing Museum have attracted public attention [1][2] - The Jiangsu Provincial Party Committee and government have established an investigation team to thoroughly investigate the problems related to the management and disposal of donated cultural relics at the Nanjing Museum [1] - The investigation will involve multiple departments, including discipline inspection, publicity, law enforcement, public security, cultural tourism, and cultural relics [1] Group 2 - A retired employee of the Nanjing Museum has publicly accused the former director, Xu Hubing, leading to increased scrutiny of the museum's management practices [2][3] - The National Cultural Heritage Administration has also formed a working group to verify the allegations related to the Nanjing Museum [2] - The retired employee has claimed to have reported issues since 2010 without receiving effective feedback, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation [2] Group 3 - The controversy includes the recent appearance of a painting, "Jiangnan Spring," which was previously donated to the museum but has been identified as a forgery [3][4] - The Nanjing Museum had previously requested the transfer of this painting to the Jiangsu Provincial Cultural Department after it was deemed not suitable for collection [4] - The painting was sold in 2001 for 6,800 yuan, and the buyer was recorded as "customer" with the item listed as a replica [4] Group 4 - The former director of the Nanjing Museum, Xu Hubing, stated that he has not been involved in museum affairs since his retirement in 2008 and is not an expert in art authentication [6] - The Jiangsu Provincial Cultural Department has initiated a joint investigation to address the issues raised and will provide formal statements regarding the findings [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Nanjing Museum is under investigation by the National Cultural Heritage Administration regarding the management of its artifacts, particularly concerning the controversy surrounding the auction of a Ming Dynasty painting attributed to Qiu Ying [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation and Response - The National Cultural Heritage Administration has formed a working group to investigate the situation regarding the Nanjing Museum's artifact management [1]. - The Nanjing Museum issued a statement on December 17, 2025, addressing media reports about the auction of a Ming Dynasty painting, which has sparked public interest [2]. - The museum has received court materials related to a lawsuit concerning a "donation contract dispute" involving Ms. Pang Shuling, and is taking the matter seriously by conducting an internal investigation [2]. Group 2: Historical Context and Actions - In January 1959, the Nanjing Museum officially received a donation of 137 paintings from Mr. Pang Zenghe, Ms. Pang Shuling's father [2]. - The five disputed paintings mentioned in the reports were identified as "forgeries" by expert groups in 1961 and 1964, and were disposed of in accordance with the museum's collection management regulations in the 1990s [2]. - The museum is committed to cooperating with the ongoing legal proceedings and will investigate the whereabouts of the five disputed paintings, ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory standards [2].

Core Viewpoint - The National Cultural Heritage Administration has formed a working group to investigate the management of cultural relics at the Nanjing Museum following media reports regarding the auction of a Ming Dynasty painting attributed to Qiu Ying [1] Group 1: Investigation and Legal Proceedings - The Nanjing Museum received two court documents related to a "donation contract dispute" involving Ms. Pang Shuling since November 2024 [1] - The museum officially accepted 137 paintings donated by Mr. Pang Zenghe (Ms. Pang Shuling's father) in January 1959 [1] - Five disputed paintings mentioned in the media were identified as "forgeries" by expert groups in 1961 and 1964 [1] Group 2: Management and Compliance - The museum disposed of the five disputed paintings in accordance with the "Museum Collection Management Measures" in the 1990s [1] - The museum will cooperate with the ongoing legal proceedings and conduct a thorough investigation into the whereabouts of the five paintings [1] - If any illegal or non-compliant actions are found during the disposal process, the museum will work with relevant authorities for serious handling [1] Group 3: Auction Market Inquiry - The authenticity of the painting "Spring in Jiangnan" appearing in the auction market as a donated artwork is still under further verification [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Nanjing Museum is under investigation by the National Cultural Heritage Administration regarding the management of its artifacts, particularly concerning the controversy surrounding the auction of a Ming Dynasty painting attributed to Qiu Ying [2][3]. Group 1: Investigation and Legal Proceedings - The Nanjing Museum received two court summons related to a "donation contract dispute" involving Ms. Pang Shuling since November 2024 [3][5]. - The museum officially accepted 137 paintings donated by Mr. Pang Zenghe (Ms. Pang Shuling's father) in January 1959 [3][5]. - Five disputed paintings mentioned in media reports were identified as "forgeries" by expert groups in 1961 and 1964 [3][5]. Group 2: Actions and Future Steps - The museum has initiated an investigation into the handling of the five disputed paintings and will cooperate with legal proceedings [3][5]. - If any illegal or irregular actions are discovered during the disposal of these paintings, the museum will work with relevant authorities for serious handling according to the law [3][5]. - The museum aims to enhance the management of donated items and its collection of artifacts moving forward [3][5].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the Ming Dynasty painting "Jiangnan Spring" has raised significant questions about the provenance and authenticity of cultural artifacts, highlighting the responsibilities of museums in safeguarding donated items and maintaining public trust [1][2][3] Group 1: Incident Overview - In May, a Ming Dynasty painting "Jiangnan Spring" was auctioned with an estimated value of 88 million yuan, leading to legal action from the descendants of the original donor, Pang Laichen [1] - The Nanjing Museum has stated it will cooperate with investigations and will take action if any illegal activities are found regarding the painting's provenance [1] - The Jiangsu Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism has formed a task force to investigate the matter, while the National Cultural Heritage Administration is also looking into the reports [1] Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - Pang Laichen was a prominent collector in modern China, and his descendants have made multiple requests to verify the status of donated artifacts, including the "Jiangnan Spring" painting [1][2] - The painting was previously identified as a forgery and was sold in 2001 for 6,800 yuan, raising questions about the museum's handling of the artwork and the implications of its potential sale [2] - The museum's actions, including the alleged unauthorized transfer and sale of the painting, have sparked public concern over transparency and accountability in cultural institutions [2][3] Group 3: Public Sentiment and Responsibilities - The case reflects a broader public sentiment regarding the need for accountability in the management of cultural heritage and the importance of protecting the legacies of donors [2][3] - The museum's duty to safeguard artifacts is emphasized, as each piece represents the trust placed in them by donors and the cultural significance of the items [2][3] - The resolution of the "Jiangnan Spring" controversy is seen as crucial not only for the Pang family but also for restoring public confidence in cultural institutions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The dispute over the "donation contract" involving the descendants of renowned collector Pang Laichen and the Nanjing Museum has garnered public attention, leading to investigations by relevant authorities [1][5]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - Pang Laichen, a prominent collector in modern China, is known for his extensive and high-quality collection, particularly in ancient Chinese paintings [2]. - In the 1950s, Pang's descendants donated several valuable paintings to the Nanjing Museum, including a notable piece, "Jiangnan Spring" by Ming artist Qiu Ying [2]. - The controversy arose when it was discovered that "Jiangnan Spring" had seemingly entered the art market and was owned by contemporary collector Lu Ting [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings and Investigations - Pang's descendants have sought to understand the status of the donated paintings, leading to a lawsuit in 2024, which resulted in a court order for the Nanjing Museum to allow inspection of the donated items by June 30, 2025 [3]. - The Nanjing Museum acknowledged the ongoing legal proceedings and stated it would investigate the whereabouts of "Jiangnan Spring" and four other missing paintings [4]. - The museum's statement indicated that if any illegal actions were found during the handling of these artworks, they would cooperate with authorities for appropriate measures [4]. Group 3: Current Developments - Following public interest, the Jiangsu Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism has also initiated an investigation into the matter, confirming that the Nanjing Museum is cooperating with relevant departments [5]. - The Nanjing Museum has committed to strengthening the management of donated items and museum collections in light of the ongoing investigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - The recent emergence of the painting "Jiangnan Spring" valued at 88 million in the auction market has sparked widespread attention, with the Nanjing Museum investigating whether the artwork is a donated piece [1] Group 1 - On December 17, the Nanjing Museum issued a statement regarding the investigation into the painting's origins and its potential status as a donated artwork [1] - On December 18, "We Video" contacted officials from Jiangsu Province to address public concerns about the museum's ability to dispose of donated collections and the origins of the painting appearing in the auction market [1] - The response also included clarifications on the ambiguous content found in the court-submitted appraisal materials [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Nanjing Museum is addressing media reports regarding the appearance of a Ming Dynasty painting by Qiu Ying in the auction market, which has raised public concern. The museum is currently involved in legal proceedings related to a gift contract dispute and is conducting an investigation into the matter [1]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Since November 2024, the museum has received two court documents regarding a lawsuit from Ms. Pang Shuling concerning a "gift contract dispute" [1]. - The museum is taking the matter seriously and has initiated an investigation to verify the claims [1]. Group 2: Artwork Authentication - In January 1959, the museum officially received 137 paintings donated by Mr. Pang Zenghe, Ms. Pang Shuling's father [1]. - The five disputed paintings mentioned in the reports were identified as "forgeries" by expert groups in 1961 and 1964 [1]. - In the 1990s, the museum disposed of these five paintings in accordance with the "Museum Collection Management Measures" [1]. Group 3: Future Actions - The museum will actively cooperate with the ongoing legal proceedings and will further investigate the whereabouts of the five disputed paintings [1]. - If any illegal or irregular actions are found during the disposal process, the museum will work with relevant authorities to handle the situation according to the law [1]. - The authenticity of the painting "Jiangnan Spring" that appeared in the auction market is still under investigation [1].