2025.11. 22 本文字数：1189，阅读时长大约2分钟 来源 | 红星资本局 根据判决书内容，经海口市美兰区人民法院审理查明，2024年7月19日，李女士（化名）试驾后决定 购买一辆 318900元的 霞光紫SU7 Max，并通过小米汽车APP交付5000元定金，该款项由小米景明 科技有限公司收取。 海口市美兰区人民法院认为，小米海口公司依据格式条款，要求消费者在未验车、未交付的情况下，在 收到通知付款后7日内支付尾款，逾期则取消订单且不退还定金，该行为实质上加重消费者的付款义 务，同时变相限制了其对车辆质量进行核验的主要权利，存在关于格式条款无效的情形。 法院认为，小米海口公司坚持要求原告限期付款后才能排产，否则取消订单并没收定金，其行为与小米 汽车公司的宣传不一致，违反诚实信用原则，实质性剥夺了原告作为消费者验车权利、加重付款义务。 故《小米汽车购买协议》中相关格式条款，符合"不公平、不合理"要件，应认定无效。 另外，法院还认为，李女士支付定金后，因资金不足请求车辆延后生产，经与小米海口公司协商一致， 同意原订单有效期为自支付定金之日起360日内，李女士在订单有效期内可以随时联系小米汽车交付专 员 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving three women and four children at a noodle restaurant in Zhengzhou has sparked significant public debate, highlighting issues of consumer rights, business practices, and social media influence [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - On August 13, three adult women and four children visited a noodle restaurant, where they spent a total of 140.58 yuan, utilizing the restaurant's "unlimited noodle refill" policy [2]. - The restaurant owner, Mr. Huo, explained that the policy was intended for individual consumption and not for sharing among multiple people, leading to a dispute when the women insisted on additional refills [2][5]. - Following the disagreement, the women left a negative review on a group-buying platform, prompting the restaurant to seek the removal of the review, which was refused [2][4]. Group 2: Legal and Social Media Implications - After the incident, Mr. Huo expressed his refusal to settle the matter amicably, indicating a willingness to pursue legal action if necessary [5]. - A subsequent agreement was reached on August 15, where both parties agreed to delete the negative review and video content related to the incident [5][6]. - However, Mr. Huo's continued online commentary about the incident led to further disputes, with the women considering legal action for invasion of privacy and defamation [6][12]. Group 3: Brand Impact and Public Reaction - The incident drew attention to the clothing brand "Seven Wolves," as social media users began to associate the brand with the restaurant's dispute, leading to a surge of comments in their live streams [7][9]. - "Seven Wolves" issued a statement emphasizing their commitment to lawful business practices and urged the public to focus on their products rather than the incident [10]. - The restaurant's owner later apologized for his behavior but faced backlash, resulting in the closure of his social media account and a shift in public perception [9][10].