Workflow
适航证
icon
Search documents
刚退3架波音,欧洲就卡C919!中国拿捏空客软肋,欧洲敢赌吗?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-06 17:06
Core Viewpoint - The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has delayed the airworthiness certification of China's C919 aircraft, stating it will take an additional 3 to 6 years for the certification process to complete, which has raised concerns about the motivations behind this delay and its implications for the aviation market [1][5][10]. Group 1: EASA's Certification Delay - EASA has used the term "technical familiarity" to justify the delay in the airworthiness certification of the C919, indicating that it is unlikely to receive certification this year [1]. - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has responded to the situation, suggesting a confrontational stance against EASA's prolonged certification process, which has lasted six years [5]. - The delay is perceived as a strategic move by EASA to protect the interests of European aerospace giants Airbus and Boeing, preventing competition from the C919 [7][10]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Opportunities - The ongoing delays in certification have created a unique opportunity for the C919, as domestic orders have surged past 1,000 units, significantly overshadowing Airbus's orders in China [16]. - The C919 has gained traction in international markets, with significant orders from countries like Saudi Arabia, which has placed an order for 10 aircraft, showcasing a shift in market dynamics [12][16]. - The C919's safety record is highlighted as superior to that of Boeing's troubled aircraft, which may influence consumer preferences and order flows in the aviation market [17][20]. Group 3: Strategic Implications for the Aviation Industry - The situation illustrates a broader trend where Western technology restrictions may inadvertently accelerate the development of China's aviation industry, leading to the emergence of alternative solutions and partnerships [16][17]. - The potential for the C919 to capture market share in the Middle East and Southeast Asia could disrupt the existing duopoly of Boeing and Airbus, leading to a reevaluation of their market strategies [21][23]. - The ongoing delays and strategic maneuvers by EASA may result in a significant shift in the global aviation landscape, with the possibility of new alliances forming outside of the traditional Western framework [21][23].