Core Points - The article discusses President Trump's claim for compensation from the U.S. Department of Justice amounting to $230 million due to investigations during his presidency [1] - Trump intends to donate any potential compensation to charity or use it for renovations at the White House [3] - Construction has begun on a new, spacious White House banquet hall, which Trump states will not cost taxpayers anything [5][6] Group 1 - Trump has requested a compensation of up to $230 million from the Justice Department, citing harm from criminal investigations during his first term [1] - The decision on whether to grant this compensation will be made by senior officials at the Justice Department, subject to Trump's approval [1] - Trump emphasizes that the issue is about "wrongful prosecution" rather than financial gain [3] Group 2 - Construction on the new banquet hall has commenced, with Trump announcing that it will be funded by himself and other unnamed donors, not taxpayers [6] - The project is estimated to cost $250 million, and Trump assures that it will not affect the existing White House structure [6] - The ongoing construction work is noticeable, with workers actively engaged in the demolition and renovation process [3]

Core Points - The U.S. Department of Justice has filed criminal charges against former FBI Director James Comey for making false statements to Congress and obstructing a judicial investigation [1][6] - Comey has pleaded not guilty and claims the charges are retaliatory for his investigation into the Trump campaign's alleged collusion with Russia [5][6] - If convicted, Comey faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison, with a court date set for January 5 of the following year [2][6] Summary by Sections - **Charges and Legal Proceedings** - Comey was charged with making false statements and obstructing justice, related to his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2020 [7] - The hearing lasted less than half an hour, and Comey made a brief statement during his arraignment [2] - **Defense and Reactions** - Comey's attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald, has filed a not guilty plea and intends to seek dismissal of the case, arguing it is retaliatory [5] - Comey has publicly stated he is innocent and expressed disappointment in the Justice Department [6] - **Context and Background** - Comey served as FBI Director from 2013 to 2017 and was dismissed during Trump's presidency after leading the investigation into the "Russia Gate" scandal [7] - The charges against Comey follow Trump's public calls for action against him and others, highlighting ongoing tensions between Trump and the Justice Department [8]

新华社北京9月27日电 美国弗吉尼亚州东区联邦地区法院的一个大陪审团25日决定，以"虚假陈述"和"妨碍国会程序"等罪名起诉联邦调查局前局 长詹姆斯·科米。紧接着，美国总统特朗普在社交媒体上连发四帖攻击科米，称其为"肮脏警察""卑鄙小人"。 特朗普社交媒体帖文截图 科米被起诉消息公布后，特朗普立即在社交媒体上表示"庆祝"，称科米"长期以来对美国非常坏"，现在"正义终于得到伸张"。就在数天前，特朗 普还在社交媒体上发帖，抱怨司法部对科米的调查迟迟没有下文，要求尽快对科米提起诉讼。 特朗普社交媒体帖文截图 此后，特朗普又发了一个长帖说："不管你是否喜欢腐败的詹姆斯·科米，我想应该不会有太多人喜欢他，他撒了谎！" 特朗普称，科米"一直都是肮脏警察"，只不过他刚好碰到了由"骗子乔·拜登"任命的法官，所以开局对他来说倒是挺顺利。"然而，话已出口，他当 时既没有含糊其辞，也没有提出任何异议。他说得斩钉截铁，对自己说的话以及表达的意思，心里没有丝毫不确定。在回答那个重大且关键的问 题时，他让自己没有任何容错空间。他只是没料到自己会被抓包。" 过了短短几分钟，特朗普再发一篇短帖文："科米是个肮脏警察。让美国再次伟大！" 十几个 ...

Core Viewpoint - A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia has indicted former FBI Director James Comey on charges of "false statements" and "obstruction of Congress" [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The indictment against Comey includes allegations of making false statements and obstructing congressional procedures [1] - The decision was made by a grand jury on the 25th of the month [1] Group 2: Reactions - President Trump celebrated the indictment on social media, calling it "justice for America" [1] - Trump had previously urged the Department of Justice to take action against Comey and others on September 20 [1] Group 3: Comey's Response - Comey released a video on social media denying the charges against him, stating that he and his family have known there would be consequences for opposing Trump [1] - He declared his innocence and expressed heartbreak for the Department of Justice [1] Group 4: Background Information - Comey served as the FBI Director from 2013 to 2017 and was involved in the investigation of alleged collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia [1] - He was dismissed during Trump's first term and later published a book criticizing Trump's suitability for the presidency [1]

Core Points - A federal grand jury in Virginia has decided to indict former FBI Director James Comey on charges of "false statements" and "obstruction of congressional proceedings" [1] - U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi accused the previous administration of "weaponizing" federal law enforcement and stated that the indictment reflects the Justice Department's commitment to hold accountable those who abuse power [1] - President Trump celebrated the indictment on social media, labeling Comey as "corrupt" and one of the "worst people in American history" [1] - Comey denied the charges in a video, asserting his innocence and expressing disappointment in the Justice Department [1] - The charges against Comey stem from his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2020 regarding the "Russia investigation" [1] Additional Context - On September 20, Trump called for the Justice Department to take action against Comey and others [2] - A report indicated that the White House forced out a prosecutor previously handling Comey's case, replacing them with one of Trump's former personal lawyers [2] - Comey served as FBI Director from 2013 to 2017 and was involved in investigating whether Trump's campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election [2] - After his dismissal, Comey published a book criticizing Trump's suitability for the presidency [2]

Core Points - Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of making false statements and obstructing justice, following President Trump's public demand for the Justice Department to "immediately" prosecute his political opponents [1] - President Trump dismissed U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Zachary Terwilliger, due to his reservations about prosecuting Comey, and appointed his White House aide, who previously served as his defense attorney, to take over the position despite her lack of prosecutorial experience [1] - The prosecutorial team had previously indicated that they could not establish a reasonable basis for prosecuting Comey, yet the new appointee sought an indictment from the grand jury [1] - The context of the indictment relates to the 2016 presidential election, where Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton lost to Republican candidate Trump, amid allegations of Russian interference and collusion with Trump's campaign, which Trump has vehemently denied [1]

Group 1 - Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of false statements and obstruction of justice, following President Trump's public demand for the Justice Department to "immediately" prosecute his political opponents [3] - Trump dismissed Virginia Eastern District Attorney Siebert due to his hesitance to pursue charges against Comey, appointing his former lawyer, Halpern, as the new prosecutor despite her lack of prosecutorial experience [3] - In 2016, Comey initiated a criminal investigation into Trump regarding allegations of collusion with Russia during the presidential election, which Trump has consistently denied [3]

Core Points - The Department of Justice has initiated a grand jury process to restart the investigation into the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election, highlighting the Trump administration's determination for retribution [1][3] - The grand jury investigation allows prosecutors to submit evidence to a group of jurors who will decide whether to bring charges, although it remains unclear if this process will yield new information [5][6] Investigation Details - The investigation has not named any targets yet, and the grand jury is expected to hear witness testimonies in the coming weeks [2] - Recent developments stem from claims made by Trump's intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, alleging that former President Obama and his national security team orchestrated a false intelligence assessment to undermine Trump's election victory [5][6] - The DOJ has stated it will form a special team to evaluate the evidence presented by Gabbard and investigate potential legal steps [5] Historical Context - Trump has long portrayed the investigation into the "Russia collusion" as a conspiracy by Democrats to sabotage his presidency, with recent actions representing a significant escalation [3][4] - Previous investigations concluded that Russia aimed to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton, but did not confirm any collusion between Trump's campaign and Russian interference [3] - The FBI's investigation faced criticism for its methods, but no criminal conspiracy to undermine Trump was substantiated [3][6] Recent Developments - The Trump administration is currently facing bipartisan criticism for withholding information regarding the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein [6] - Trump's allies have consistently criticized the "Russia collusion" investigation, with some officials labeling it a disgrace [6] - A report by special prosecutor John Durham criticized the FBI for confirmation bias and downplaying evidence that did not support the narrative of collusion [6][7] Additional Findings - The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman released a recently declassified appendix from Durham's report, which allegedly reveals a coordinated plan to undermine Trump's presidency [7] - The appendix includes original intelligence analyzed by Durham's team, suggesting possible Russian interference in the narrative against Trump [7]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing political struggle between former President Obama and current President Trump has evolved into a significant event affecting the entire nation and even international relations, with Trump using the "Russia investigation" to deflect criticism regarding his economic policies and escalating trade tensions [1][3]. Group 1: Political Strategy - Trump's revival of the "Russia investigation" serves as a strategic move to shift public attention away from his economic policy failures and the mounting pressure from the trade war [1][3]. - The political atmosphere remains tense, with Trump's actions seen as a calculated strategy to portray himself as a victim, thereby solidifying his support base and creating divisions within the Democratic Party [1][3]. - Trump's internal "purge" of staff involved in China policy raises questions about his intentions, with analysts suggesting it may be a precursor to potential adjustments in foreign policy [3][5]. Group 2: Domestic and International Implications - Trump's aggressive rhetoric against Obama, including accusations of treason, not only targets his opponent but also reflects his determination to maintain a strong political stance [5]. - The implications of Trump's actions on the international stage are significant, as they may lead to questions about the stability of U.S. politics and its impact on foreign diplomatic decisions [5][7]. - The response from the Democratic Party, particularly the unity between moderate and progressive factions, will be crucial for future electoral outcomes, highlighting the broader implications of this political conflict [7].

Group 1 - The article discusses the release of evidence by U.S. National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, indicating that former President Obama and his administration intentionally fabricated intelligence to promote a false narrative regarding President Trump's alleged collusion with Russia [1] - Obama’s team has entered a "damage control" mode following the allegations, with a statement from Obama’s spokesperson dismissing the claims as absurd and a poor attempt to divert attention [1] - Gabbard claims to have uncovered substantial evidence that shows the Obama administration fabricated the January 2017 intelligence community assessment report, which falsely claimed that Putin and the Russian government helped Trump win the 2016 election [1][2] Group 2 - Gabbard intends to submit criminal charges against Obama to the Department of Justice, asserting that the evidence directly indicates that the intelligence assessment was orchestrated by Obama [1] - The U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi has responded by forming a task force to investigate Obama based on the evidence disclosed by Gabbard [1] - The article also highlights ongoing controversies surrounding financier Jeffrey Epstein and the government's handling of related documents, with Trump urging media focus on the alleged conspiracy involving Obama [2]