（文章来源：央视新闻） 人民财讯10月11日电，当地时间10月9日，美国共和党众议员玛乔丽·格林接受采访表示，她不认为政 府"停摆"有助于共和党人赢得中期选举，也不赞同共和党人忽视医疗保险危机。她以亲身经历说明，美 国物价没有下降。玛乔丽·格林表示，通货膨胀压垮了人们，美国人在艰难维持生计。她强调，如果她 的子女因此受到影响，她会抛弃党派身份，为他们全力而战，这一代人几乎无法维持生计，对未来感到 绝望。 ...

当地时间9月28日，总台记者获悉，美国密苏里州州长基霍签署了明年中期选举选区重划方案，使其正 式成为州法。此前，该法案已于12日在密苏里州参议院获得通过。 责编：李磊、王瑞景 这一方案或有助于共和党候选人在该州中期选举8个选区中赢得7个，比共和党目前拥有的席位多一个。 美国总统特朗普之前呼吁密苏里州、印第安纳州和佛罗里达州重新划分选区，以增加共和党在明年中期 选举中获胜的概率，引发全国性选区重划活动。美国各州通常每10年在全国人口普查显示各州拥有多少 个众议院席位之后，在10年周期的初期重新绘制选区地图。（总台记者 张颖哲） ...

Core Points - The Argentine government announced the temporary cancellation of export withholding taxes on agricultural products, including grains, beef, and poultry, effective until October 31 [1] - This measure aims to increase the supply of US dollars in the market by encouraging the agricultural sector to sell more products [1] - The Argentine peso has depreciated over 10% against the US dollar in the past month, prompting the central bank to intervene with $1.1 billion in foreign reserves [1] Summary by Category Government Actions - The temporary cancellation of export withholding taxes is a response to ongoing financial market turmoil and aims to stabilize the exchange rate ahead of the upcoming midterm elections on October 26 [1] - Previously, on July 26, the government permanently reduced withholding tax rates on various agricultural products, including beef and poultry from 6.75% to 5%, corn and sorghum from 12% to 9.5%, sunflower seeds from 7.5% to 5.5%, soybeans from 33% to 26%, and soybean by-products from 31% to 24.5% [1] Market Impact - The cancellation of export taxes is expected to boost agricultural sales, thereby increasing the dollar supply in the market [1] - Analysts suggest that while this measure may alleviate immediate pressures, it does not address the underlying political crisis [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Missouri Senate approved a redistricting plan that may help Republican candidates win 7 out of 8 congressional districts in the upcoming midterm elections, increasing their current seat count by one [1] Group 1: Redistricting Plan - The Missouri Senate voted 21 to 11 in favor of the redistricting plan for the 2024 midterm elections [1] - The plan is expected to assist Republican candidates in gaining an additional seat in the House of Representatives [1] - Republican Governor Mike Parson is set to sign the redistricting plan into law [1] Group 2: Political Implications - The redistricting is aimed at preventing Democrats from reclaiming House seats in Missouri [1] - Democratic senators argue that the redistricting is illegal and violates the state constitution, which prohibits redistricting within a 10-year period [1] - Protests occurred at the state capitol, with thousands demanding a statewide vote on the redistricting proposal [1] Group 3: National Context - Former President Trump has called for redistricting in Missouri, Indiana, and Florida to enhance Republican chances in the midterm elections, sparking nationwide redistricting efforts [1] - Typically, states redraw district maps every 10 years following the national census to reflect changes in population and congressional seat allocation [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the Federal Reserve is likely to cut interest rates in September, with the decision hinging on upcoming CPI data, and the potential for a significant cut of either 25 or 50 basis points [1][2] - The U.S. labor market showed disappointing performance in August, with non-farm payrolls increasing by only 22,000, significantly below the expected 75,000, and the unemployment rate rising to 4.3% [1][2] - The weak employment data suggests a high probability of economic recession, especially as the three-month average job growth is below 50,000, which historically indicates recession risks [1][2] Group 2 - The sectors most affected by poor employment performance include IT, financial services, manufacturing, and wholesale trade, with a notable impact on high-income white-collar jobs [2] - Despite the downturn, wage growth continues, and labor participation rates have increased, indicating some resilience in the labor market [2] - The Federal Reserve is expected to reassess economic risks due to the weak labor market, making employment a more critical focus in their dual mandate [2][3] Group 3 - The upcoming midterm elections in 2026 are anticipated to be heavily influenced by economic conditions, with the economy serving as a key factor in voter sentiment [3][4] - The major economic issues at stake include the "Build Back Better" plan and the tariff war, with their impacts on prices, employment, and income being crucial for electoral outcomes [4][5] - Republican strategies include redistricting efforts to gain an advantage in the House of Representatives, while Democrats face challenges in maintaining their traditional strongholds [5]

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration is considering declaring a national housing emergency in response to the ongoing housing affordability crisis in the U.S. This move is also seen as a strategy to bolster support for the Republican Party ahead of the midterm elections in 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Housing Crisis Response - U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent indicated that the government is exploring actions to address the housing affordability crisis, potentially announcing a national emergency in the fall [1]. - The housing market faces significant challenges, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has increased rental costs and mortgage rates, impacting potential homebuyers [1][2]. - The Trump administration has previously used emergency declarations to bypass lengthy legislative processes, suggesting that a national housing emergency could be a tactical move to implement swift actions [1][2]. Group 2: Political Strategy - Housing affordability is defined as a "key pillar" of the Republican Party's campaign agenda for the 2026 midterm elections, with government officials researching ways to standardize local building and zoning regulations and reduce housing transaction costs [2]. - The issue of housing affordability was also a focal point in the 2024 presidential campaign, with promises from candidates to provide tax credits and down payment assistance to homebuyers [2]. - The potential declaration of a housing emergency is viewed as a strategy to attract midterm election voters and address public concerns regarding the housing crisis [2]. Group 3: Trump's Background in Real Estate - President Trump’s extensive background in the real estate industry positions him as knowledgeable about the current housing challenges, having built a career in real estate development since the 1970s [3]. - His experience includes significant projects and a deep understanding of the entire development process, from land acquisition to sales and marketing, along with established connections in various sectors [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential implications of former President Trump's actions against the Federal Reserve, suggesting that his attempts to undermine its independence could threaten the stability of the U.S. dollar and the broader financial system [1][5][10]. Group 1: Trump's Actions and Motivations - Trump has been pressuring the Federal Reserve, including the dismissal of board member Lisa Cook, to lower interest rates in an effort to stimulate the economy and reduce debt costs ahead of the midterm elections [1][4][10]. - The urgency behind Trump's actions is linked to rising inflation and unemployment in the U.S., as well as the significant national debt of $36 trillion, which incurs over $1 trillion in interest annually [4][10]. Group 2: Federal Reserve's Independence - The Federal Reserve was established in 1913 to prevent financial crises, designed to be an independent entity that balances power between the government and private banks [7][8]. - The independence of the Federal Reserve is crucial for maintaining confidence in the U.S. dollar and preventing inflation, as historical instances of political interference have led to severe economic consequences [9][11]. Group 3: Potential Consequences - Trump's actions could lead to a loss of confidence in the Federal Reserve, prompting global investors to sell off U.S. dollars and bonds, which could destabilize the financial system [10][12]. - The article warns that undermining the Federal Reserve's independence for personal political gain could have dire repercussions, as seen in past instances where political pressure led to rampant inflation [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The redistricting battle in the U.S. is adding instability and high risks to the upcoming midterm elections, with Texas and California leading the charge in a national struggle that could reshape congressional control [1][4]. Group 1: Texas Redistricting - The Texas Senate passed a redistricting bill that could allow the Republican Party to gain five additional seats in the House of Representatives during the midterm elections [1][3]. - Governor Abbott expressed his intent to sign the bill, which he described as a significant opportunity for Texas voters to elect more Republican representatives [3]. - The redistricting efforts are seen as a political maneuver to maintain Republican control in Congress, with Trump urging for more Republican-leaning districts [3][7]. Group 2: Democratic Response - Texas Democrats attempted to block the redistricting bill by staging a walkout, which delayed the legislative process [4]. - Following the passage of the bill, Texas Democrats vowed to file a lawsuit against the new congressional map, claiming it undermines voting rights for Latino and African American communities [4][6]. - California's Democratic-controlled legislature responded by passing a package of bills to hold a special vote on redistricting, aiming to secure additional seats for Democrats in the midterms [5]. Group 3: National Implications - The redistricting conflict is part of a broader trend where both parties are engaging in redistricting battles across multiple states, with potential advantages for Republicans in states like Ohio and Florida [5][6]. - The practice of redistricting for partisan gain, known as "gerrymandering," has been a longstanding issue in U.S. politics, with modern data analysis tools exacerbating the situation [7]. - Historical patterns indicate that the party of the sitting president often loses seats in midterm elections, a trend that Trump aims to counteract through these redistricting efforts [6][7].

Core Points - The Texas House of Representatives passed a redistricting bill, making Texas the first state to do so, which could help the Republican Party gain seats in the House of Representatives for the 2026 midterm elections [1][3] - The new district map aims to merge several Democratic strongholds, reducing the number of districts controlled by Democrats and diluting their influence by incorporating conservative voters into these areas [1][3] - The bill requires coordination with a previously passed version in the Texas Senate and must be signed by Governor Greg Abbott to take effect, which is expected given Republican control [1][3] Political Reactions - Texas Democratic Representative John Bucy expressed deep concern over the bill, labeling it a "Trump map" designed to create more seats for Republicans, indicating a shift towards authoritarianism [2] - Following the bill's passage, Texas Democrats had previously attempted to block it by leaving the state, but they have since returned and are considering similar actions in California [3] Broader Implications - Currently, Republicans hold a narrow majority in the House with 219 seats to 212, and successful redistricting in Texas could further solidify their position ahead of the midterms [3] - Other Republican-led states like Ohio, Missouri, and Indiana may look to replicate Texas's redistricting strategy [3] - California's Democratic leadership plans to counteract the Texas redistricting by proposing a special vote to seek voter approval for their own redistricting efforts [3][5]

Group 1 - The Texas House of Representatives passed a redistricting bill aimed at increasing Republican seats in Congress for the 2026 midterm elections, with a vote of 88 in favor and 52 against [1] - The new district map combines several Democratic strongholds to reduce the number of districts controlled by Democrats and incorporates conservative voters into currently Democratic-held districts, potentially allowing Republicans to gain five congressional seats in Texas [1][3] - The bill must be reconciled with a previously passed version in the Texas Senate and requires the governor's signature to take effect, which is expected to proceed smoothly given Republican control [1] Group 2 - Texas Democrats may file a lawsuit against the new district map, claiming it violates provisions of the Voting Rights Act that protect minority voters [1] - The current composition of the House of Representatives shows Republicans holding a narrow majority with 219 seats to Democrats' 212 [3] - Republican efforts to replicate Texas's redistricting strategy are anticipated in other Republican-led states such as Ohio, Missouri, and Indiana [3] Group 3 - California Democrats, led by Governor Gavin Newsom, are planning a counterattack against the Texas redistricting efforts, proposing a special vote on November 4 to seek voter approval for redistricting [3] - Unlike Republican-led states, many Democratic-led states, including California, have redistricting powers held by nonpartisan commissions, making it more challenging to implement rapid redistricting changes [3]