Core Viewpoint - Recent discussions surrounding Wang Jianlin and Wanda Group have intensified due to disputes involving subsidiary project companies, leading to height restrictions on the group and its leader, which have since been lifted. The company attributes this to "information asymmetry" within the execution layer [2] Group 1: Management and Recruitment Issues - A decade ago, during the real estate and fintech boom, financial professionals encountered recruitment challenges with Wanda Group, highlighting a disconnect between the company's management style and industry expectations [4] - The company emphasized rigid working hours and failed to recognize the flexible nature of financial roles, indicating a lack of understanding of the financial sector's operational dynamics [6] - The recruitment process revealed a lack of attention to detail, as the company did not adequately match candidates' qualifications with job requirements, leading to concerns about the professionalism of its business operations [6] Group 2: Financial Missteps and Regulatory Challenges - Wanda Group's financial acquisitions faced significant setbacks, exemplified by the 2014 acquisition of "Kuaiqian Payment" for approximately 2 billion, which was later sold at a 70% discount, underscoring the company's professional shortcomings [8] - The company exhibited a disregard for regulatory compliance when attempting to launch financial products, leading to operational limitations and highlighting a culture of arrogance [10] - The group's high-interest rates on small loan products raised compliance issues, reflecting a broader trend of regulatory tightening in the financial sector [12] Group 3: Strategic Misalignment and Market Challenges - The company's heavy reliance on commercial real estate has become problematic as the industry faces significant challenges, including declining foot traffic and rental income due to the rise of e-commerce and live-streaming sales [17] - Despite recognizing the downturn in commercial real estate, Wanda Group continued to acquire land aggressively, leading to financial strain and necessitating the sale of project equity at discounted rates [19] - The shift towards "light asset" and "high value-added" sectors contrasts sharply with Wanda's ongoing commitment to heavy asset investments, indicating a misalignment with current market trends [21] Conclusion - The decline of Wanda Group can be attributed to multiple factors, including a lack of professional management, disregard for regulatory frameworks, and misjudgment of market trends, serving as a cautionary tale for other industry giants [21]