Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of food safety in schools and highlights typical cases of violations to deter illegal activities related to food safety in educational institutions [2]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1: A defendant was sentenced to 7 years in prison for adding sodium nitrite to school lunches, resulting in food poisoning for 56 students [3][4][6]. - Case 2: A defendant was sentenced to 7 months in prison for selling duck meat disguised as beef to a university cafeteria, with sales amounting to over 120,000 yuan [7][8]. - Case 3: A defendant was sentenced to 3 years in prison for embezzling 547,000 yuan from a student nutrition program by substituting chicken legs with wings and falsely reporting expenses [10][12]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The court's decisions reflect a strict stance against food safety violations in schools, aiming to protect students' health and deter similar crimes [6][12]. - The use of sodium nitrite, while permitted in certain meat products, is heavily regulated, and violations can lead to severe legal consequences [5][6]. - The cases illustrate the legal repercussions for fraudulent practices in food supply chains, emphasizing the need for compliance with food safety standards [8][12].

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court of China released typical cases related to food safety in schools, highlighting issues from suppliers to regulatory bodies, including expired food and inferior ingredients [1][2] - A specific case involved an individual named Luo, who sold fake beef products made from duck meat, generating over 120,000 yuan in illegal profits [1][2] Group 1: Food Safety Issues - The case illustrates the use of low-cost duck meat disguised as higher-priced beef or lamb, with perpetrators using additives to mimic the taste of beef or lamb [2] - The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of food safety in school canteens, urging stricter supervision and the selection of qualified suppliers during food procurement [2] Group 2: Legal Consequences - Luo was sentenced to seven months in prison and fined 100,000 yuan for selling inferior products, with the court highlighting the punitive role of criminal law in such cases [2] - The law stipulates that selling inferior products with a total sales amount exceeding 50,000 yuan but less than 200,000 yuan can result in imprisonment of up to two years or detention [2]