Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering historical lessons, particularly regarding Japanese militarism, and condemns recent statements by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan as a potential justification for collective self-defense, reflecting a dangerous historical perspective [1][2]. Group 1 - Takaichi's remarks about Taiwan represent a revival of militaristic views in Japan, which are rooted in a distorted understanding of history [1][2]. - The article highlights the atrocities committed by Japanese troops during the Nanjing Massacre, illustrating the historical context that informs current political rhetoric [1]. - There is a contrast drawn between Takaichi and other Japanese politicians who acknowledge and reflect on Japan's wartime actions, suggesting a divide in contemporary Japanese political thought [2][3]. Group 2 - The article recalls the visits of former Japanese Prime Ministers who have shown remorse for Japan's wartime actions, indicating that there are still voices in Japan advocating for a correct understanding of history [2]. - It stresses that denying historical facts does not erase them, and that recognizing the truth is essential for peace and reconciliation between China and Japan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering historical lessons, particularly regarding Japan's militarism and its implications for global peace and stability, especially in light of recent provocative statements by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The article references the Nanjing Massacre and the atrocities committed by Japanese troops during the Second Sino-Japanese War, highlighting the need to confront and acknowledge these historical events [1][2]. - It mentions the existence of a sculpture at the Nanjing Massacre Memorial that symbolizes the suffering endured during the invasion, serving as a reminder of the past [1]. Group 2: Current Political Climate - The article discusses the resurgence of militaristic rhetoric in Japan, particularly from figures like Takaichi, who has denied historical events such as the Nanjing Massacre and has characterized Japan's wartime actions as self-defense [1][2]. - It contrasts Takaichi's views with those of other Japanese politicians who have shown remorse and acknowledged Japan's wartime actions, thereby earning respect from the Chinese people [2][3]. Group 3: Call for Accountability - The article argues that denying historical facts does not erase them and stresses the importance of defending historical truth as a means of honoring the victims and safeguarding peace [3]. - It advocates for a courageous acknowledgment of history as essential for improving Sino-Japanese relations and moving forward positively [3].