"今年是日本宣布无条件投降80周年。侵略战争期间，日本军国主义的罪行令许多国家特别是亚洲邻国 饱受摧残与苦难，日本理应深刻反省侵略历史。然而，日本右翼势力却用种种手段，不断淡化侵略历 史、美化战争罪行。"日本爱知县圆光寺住持大东仁在接受本报记者采访时表示，只有树立正确历史 观，日本才能真正卸下历史包袱，赢得亚洲国家和国际社会的信任和尊重。 在揭示战争真相、挖掘历史记忆的过程中，大东仁受到日本右翼势力的攻击。他始终据理力争，以确凿 的历史事实和证据作为回应。他向记者讲述了这样一次经历：2007年侵华日军南京大屠杀遇难同胞纪念 馆新馆开馆，大东仁捐赠了一批侵华日军资料，经日本媒体报道后引起日本右翼分子抗议，一些人甚至 到其讲座现场质问、辱骂。大东仁拿出历史史料、以理服人。"面对不了解历史的人，史实资料就是最 有力的证据。"大东仁说，他坚持每年举办展览和讲座，将真实的历史展示给更多日本人民。 "收集侵华日军的资料只是通往和平之路的'第一步'。将这些资料捐赠给纪念馆，妥善整理和保存并向 公众展示，为下一代研究者提供持续研究的基础，便从'第一步'变成'一万步、两万步'。如果再被媒体 采访报道，就可能产生'十万步'的效果 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the controversial actions and statements of Takashi Sanae, a Japanese politician known for her right-wing views, including her denial of historical events related to Japan's wartime actions and her advocacy for changes to Japan's pacifist constitution [1][3][5]. Group 1: Historical Denial - Takashi Sanae has publicly denied the Nanjing Massacre, which resulted in the deaths of 300,000 Chinese people during World War II [5]. - She has also denied the forced recruitment of "comfort women," with over 200,000 Chinese women being subjected to this during the Japanese invasion from 1931 to 1945 [7]. Group 2: Political Actions - Since her election to the Japanese Diet in 1993, Takashi has advocated for amending Japan's pacifist constitution and expanding the Japan Self-Defense Forces [9]. - She has visited the Yasukuni Shrine more than 10 times since 2014, a site that is controversial due to its association with Japan's militaristic past [14][16]. Group 3: Comparison with Other Politicians - The article contrasts Takashi's views with those of former Japanese Prime Ministers like Murayama Tomiichi and Hatoyama Yukio, who have shown a willingness to acknowledge Japan's wartime actions and express remorse [18][19].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering historical lessons, particularly regarding Japan's militarism and its implications for global peace and stability, especially in light of recent provocative statements by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The article references the Nanjing Massacre and the atrocities committed by Japanese troops during the Second Sino-Japanese War, highlighting the need to confront and acknowledge these historical events [1][2]. - It mentions the existence of a sculpture at the Nanjing Massacre Memorial that symbolizes the suffering endured during the invasion, serving as a reminder of the past [1]. Group 2: Current Political Climate - The article discusses the resurgence of militaristic rhetoric in Japan, particularly from figures like Takaichi, who has denied historical events such as the Nanjing Massacre and has characterized Japan's wartime actions as self-defense [1][2]. - It contrasts Takaichi's views with those of other Japanese politicians who have shown remorse and acknowledged Japan's wartime actions, thereby earning respect from the Chinese people [2][3]. Group 3: Call for Accountability - The article argues that denying historical facts does not erase them and stresses the importance of defending historical truth as a means of honoring the victims and safeguarding peace [3]. - It advocates for a courageous acknowledgment of history as essential for improving Sino-Japanese relations and moving forward positively [3].

Core Viewpoint - The seminar commemorating the 80th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery emphasizes the importance of establishing a correct historical perspective to contribute to cross-strait peace and prosperity [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the recovery of Taiwan [1]. - The ceremony for Taiwan's recovery took place on October 25, 1945, in Taipei, where Japan formally surrendered [1]. Group 2: Political Commentary - The Vice Chairman of the Kuomintang, Hsieh Li-yin, criticized the Democratic Progressive Party for promoting narratives like "end of war" and "undetermined status of Taiwan," which he believes hinder cross-strait exchanges [1]. - Former Kuomintang Secretary-General Chang Jung-kung argued that the notion of "no recovery day" for Taiwan is unfounded, emphasizing the shared identity of both sides of the strait as part of the Chinese nation [1]. Group 3: Cultural Significance - The chairman of the New Party, Wu Cheng-tian, expressed that the recovery of Taiwan was a source of pride for the Taiwanese people, contrasting it with the DPP's "end of war" rhetoric [2]. - The seminar included a poetry reading event to commemorate the anniversary, highlighting the emotional connection to history through literature [2].

Core Viewpoint - The event of the screening of "Nanjing Photo Studio" serves as a platform for reflection on historical atrocities and emphasizes the importance of acknowledging history to prevent future tragedies [5][7]. Group 1: Event Overview - The screening of "Nanjing Photo Studio" was held on September 17, organized by the Chinese Embassy in Japan and attended by approximately 150 representatives from various sectors in Japan [1][2]. - Chinese Ambassador to Japan, Wu Jianghao, delivered a speech highlighting the significance of remembering the Nanjing Massacre, which occurred on December 13, 1937, marking a dark chapter in human history [4][5]. Group 2: Historical Reflection - Wu Jianghao emphasized that the true history of the Nanjing Massacre is far more brutal than depicted in films, urging the audience to reflect on the horrors of war and cherish peace [5]. - The ambassador noted the recent commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, stressing the importance of remembering history to foster reconciliation [5]. Group 3: Japanese Perspectives - Attendees from Japan expressed their sorrow over the film, pointing out the deficiencies in Japan's historical education and the media's focus on victim narratives while neglecting the perpetrator's responsibilities [7]. - Members of the "Inherit and Develop the Murayama Statement" in Japan called for acknowledgment of historical facts and urged the government and citizens to confront the past rather than cover it up, advocating for dialogue and reflection to uphold peace [7].

Group 1 - The core theme of the articles revolves around the significance of the Anti-Japanese War in shaping national identity and historical consciousness in China, emphasizing the importance of remembering and studying this period to foster patriotism and unity [19][20][29] - Various publications are highlighted that provide insights into the history of the Anti-Japanese War, including significant works by authors and institutions that aim to present a comprehensive narrative of this historical event [4][6][10][12][30] - The articles stress the need for continuous research and storytelling of the Anti-Japanese War to counteract historical misconceptions and to promote a correct understanding of China's role in the global context of World War II [29][30][31] Group 2 - The importance of preserving historical memory through literature and education is emphasized, with a call for readers to engage with the past to understand the sacrifices made during the war [19][20][22][24] - The articles discuss the emotional and cultural impact of the Anti-Japanese War on contemporary Chinese society, highlighting how personal stories and historical accounts contribute to a collective national memory [19][21][25] - There is a focus on the role of international perspectives in understanding the Anti-Japanese War, advocating for a broader recognition of China's contributions to the global fight against fascism [12][27][30]

Core Viewpoint - The importance of conducting in-depth research on the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War is emphasized, highlighting the need to uphold a correct historical perspective and counteract distortions of history [1][2][7] Group 1: Historical Significance - The victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War established China's status as a major power and opened a path for national rejuvenation [1] - The Anti-Japanese War is recognized as a crucial turning point for the Chinese nation, leading to the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949 [4][13] Group 2: Historical Perspective - A correct historical perspective is essential for understanding the significance of the Anti-Japanese War and its role in the global anti-fascist struggle [7][14] - The historical narrative must be based on factual evidence and thorough research, resisting historical nihilism [12][15] Group 3: Research and Documentation - There is a call for enhanced collection and organization of historical materials related to the Anti-Japanese War, including documents, photographs, and testimonies [15][16] - The need for systematic and high-quality research outputs in the field of Anti-Japanese War studies is highlighted [12][16] Group 4: International Relations and Academic Exchange - The importance of maintaining correct political and academic directions in historical research is stressed, particularly in the context of international academic exchanges [16][17] - Collaborative research efforts among scholars from different countries are encouraged to foster a better understanding of historical issues [16][17]

Core Viewpoint - Japan must deeply reflect on its historical responsibilities and completely sever ties with any actions that beautify or cover up its history of aggression, in order to genuinely pursue a path of peaceful development and earn the trust of its Asian neighbors and the international community [1][4]. Group 1: Historical Reflection - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering history not to perpetuate hatred, but to uphold peace, highlighting Japan's militaristic past and the severe human rights violations it committed during its invasions [1][2]. - Japan's acknowledgment of its wartime actions is seen as a litmus test for its moral integrity and commitment to peace, suggesting that only by establishing a correct historical perspective can Japan shed its historical burdens and gain respect from Asian countries and the international community [1][3]. Group 2: Current Political Context - The article notes that despite Japan's historical commitments, right-wing forces in Japan continue to undermine historical accountability, such as visiting Yasukuni Shrine and downplaying wartime atrocities in educational materials [2][3]. - Japan's recent military actions, including increasing defense budgets and relaxing weapon export restrictions, are viewed as contradictory to its post-war peace commitments, raising concerns among Asian neighbors and the international community about Japan's strategic direction [2][3]. Group 3: Sino-Japanese Relations - A correct approach to historical reflection is deemed essential for the reconstruction and development of Sino-Japanese relations, with past commitments made in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement highlighted as foundational [3]. - The article warns that recent provocations by Japanese politicians regarding Taiwan and the portrayal of China as a threat in defense documents undermine the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations and challenge the post-war international order [3].