央广网北京12月14日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，今年是南京大 屠杀惨案发生88周年。日本资深新闻工作者上丸洋一表示，日本媒体当年记录了南京大屠杀的一部分事 实，同时对大量暴行保持沉默。 意大利法学家迪利贝托：我认为，日本首相发表错误言论性质非常严重，她明显违背历史事实，反 映出危险的倾向，这是在试图抹去一段不可能被抹去的历史记忆。日本帝国主义1931年9月开始发动残 酷的侵华战争，更在1937年制造了南京大屠杀，数周内30万人被杀害，这样的历史记忆不容被抹去。此 外，任何国家试图干涉他国内政都是极其严重的行为，一个中国原则不容歪曲挑衅。 日本铭心会会长松冈环表示，日本政府必须深刻反省战争罪行，正视并承认历史事实。 松冈环：那段历史绝对是事实，不能因国家需要而被歪曲。不把真正的历史讲给日本的孩子们听是 不公平、不公正的。正视事实才能认清错误，才能不重蹈覆辙。日本政府总是试图淡化、歪曲侵略历 史，我对此感到愤怒。 国际人士表示，高市早苗的错误言论违背历史事实，干涉他国内政，破坏战后国际秩序和地区和平 稳定。 上丸洋一：就算那是惨无人道的、令人羞耻的历史，也不能否认南京大屠杀，不能否认 ...

一些欧洲媒体和分析人士也认为，高市的一系列言行会影响地区和平稳定，值得国际社会警惕。德国《世界报》刊文称，高 市否认侵略、美化战争的错误史观，代表的是"一个跌回旧秩序的日本"。斯洛伐克中欧亚洲研究所学者罗伯特·万塞尔撰文指出， 高市"对日本战争历史持修正主义立场"，模糊日本发动"侵略战争"的历史，这会对亚洲地区的稳定造成负面影响。 2015年，时任德国总理默克尔访问日本时，向时任日本首相安倍晋三强调正视历史"是实现战后和解的前提"。当时欧洲媒体 就此评论："默克尔给安倍晋三上了历史课"。而现任日本首相高市早苗自诩"安倍路线"继承者，其在历史认知上的"黑历史"早就被 欧洲媒体和学者所知。英国《独立报》近期在报道中提到，高市曾与纳粹支持者、"日本国家社会主义工人党"头目山田一成合 影。波兰"防务24"网站认为，高市曾多次参拜供奉二战甲级战犯的靖国神社，质疑反省侵略历史的"村山谈话"，其历史修正主义 倾向会损害日本在西方国家眼中的信誉。 央视网消息：欧洲舆论注意到，同为二战策源地与战败国，日本与德国在历史认知与态度上形成了鲜明反差。德国致力于铭 记昔日战争罪责，努力弥补对他国造成的历史创伤，与地区国家推进欧洲一体化 ...

新华社记者褚怡 杜哲宇 德国与波兰近日在柏林举行政府间磋商期间，德国总理默茨表示德方将永远铭记二战时期纳粹德国对波兰造成的深重伤害，将始终承担历史责 任，强调"正视历史永无止境"。 德国与日本同为二战的策源地和战败国，对二战历史的态度却大相径庭。德国致力于铭记昔日战争罪责，努力弥补对他国造成的历史创伤，与地 区国家推进欧洲一体化进程。日本则在右翼力量裹挟下，刻意回避和模糊战争罪行，企图切割历史责任，尤其是近期日本首相高市早苗发表涉台 错误言论且拒绝悔改，引发地区国家和国际社会高度警惕。 新华社柏林12月4日电 题：德国又给高市上了一堂课 不能把历史排除在视野之外 默茨1日在会见到访的波兰总理图斯克后，明确表示将"铭记历史"作为德波关系的重要议程，称二战时期纳粹德国对波兰的暴行是"一条核心历史 教训"，"我们不能、也不愿把历史排除在视野之外，我们必须让记忆保持鲜活，哪怕是痛苦的记忆"。默茨说："铭记历史、正视历史永无止境， 德国会始终承担自己的历史责任。" 7月18日，德国总理默茨出席在柏林举行的夏季新闻发布会。新华社记者 李函林 摄 会谈当天，德国政府宣布，将在柏林为因纳粹暴行和在二战中遇难的波兰公民建造永久 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have been condemned by the Social Democratic Party of Japan, highlighting concerns over regional peace and urging the Japanese government to confront historical realities [2][4]. Group 1: Political Reactions - The Social Democratic Party's national joint secretary, Hiroshi Yamashiro, expressed strong anger over Takaichi's comments, stating that such statements could provoke unnecessary conflict and drag Japan into war [4]. - Yamashiro emphasized that Japan, as a nation with a pacifist constitution, must not allow such provocations and should acknowledge its historical responsibilities [6]. Group 2: Historical Context - Yamashiro pointed out that Japan recognized the Chinese government as the sole legitimate government during the normalization of diplomatic relations in 1972, which included an understanding that Taiwan is part of China [4][6]. - He criticized the Japanese education system for failing to teach the historical context of Japan's wartime actions, which has led to a lack of awareness and reflection on past aggressions [6]. Group 3: Implications of Military Intervention - Yamashiro warned that any military intervention in Taiwan, which is considered an internal issue of China, would be viewed as an act of aggression and could lead to severe repercussions for Japan [8]. - He stated that if Japan does not correct its course regarding these remarks, it risks facing negative consequences [6][8].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering historical lessons, particularly regarding Japanese militarism, and condemns recent statements by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan as a potential justification for collective self-defense, reflecting a dangerous historical perspective [1][2]. Group 1 - Takaichi's remarks about Taiwan represent a revival of militaristic views in Japan, which are rooted in a distorted understanding of history [1][2]. - The article highlights the atrocities committed by Japanese troops during the Nanjing Massacre, illustrating the historical context that informs current political rhetoric [1]. - There is a contrast drawn between Takaichi and other Japanese politicians who acknowledge and reflect on Japan's wartime actions, suggesting a divide in contemporary Japanese political thought [2][3]. Group 2 - The article recalls the visits of former Japanese Prime Ministers who have shown remorse for Japan's wartime actions, indicating that there are still voices in Japan advocating for a correct understanding of history [2]. - It stresses that denying historical facts does not erase them, and that recognizing the truth is essential for peace and reconciliation between China and Japan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama emphasizes the importance of acknowledging historical events and learning from them, particularly in the context of Japan's past actions during the war [1]. Group 1 - Yukio Hatoyama expresses gratitude for being invited to the 80th anniversary commemorative event of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War [1]. - He participates in the event with a serious mindset, reflecting on the need for Japan to confront its historical actions [1]. - Hatoyama conveys a sense of reflection and apology as a Japanese individual and former Prime Minister while attending the commemorative event [1]. Group 2 - He highlights the profound historical significance and contemporary relevance of President Xi Jinping's speech during the commemorative event [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson emphasized the historical atrocities committed by the Japanese military during World War II, particularly the use of biological warfare and inhumane human experiments, as revealed by recently declassified Russian documents [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Historical Atrocities**: The spokesperson highlighted that the Japanese military openly violated international law during World War II by conducting biological warfare against the Chinese people, committing heinous human experiments, and perpetrating crimes against humanity [1] - **Call for Reflection**: The statement urged Japan to deeply reflect on its history of aggression, respect the feelings of the victims from China and other affected countries, and take concrete actions to sever ties with militarism to avoid repeating past mistakes [1] - **Significance of Historical Awareness**: The spokesperson noted that acknowledging history is essential for gaining respect, learning from the past is crucial for paving the future, and remembering past events is vital to prevent falling into the same pitfalls again [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes the ongoing struggle for recognition and justice regarding the "comfort women" issue, with both South Korea and Japan holding events to address historical grievances and advocate for victims' rights [1][2] - In South Korea, various commemorative activities took place, including a significant event in Seoul attended by over 200 participants, highlighting the government's commitment to a victim-centered approach [1] - The South Korean government has officially registered 240 "comfort women" victims, with only 6 still alive, underscoring the urgency of addressing their plight and restoring their dignity [1] Group 2 - In Japan, civil society groups organized protests demanding the government acknowledge its historical responsibilities regarding the "comfort women" issue, with participants calling for apologies and reparations for the victims [2] - The protests included readings of testimonies from "comfort women," emphasizing the need for historical accuracy and accountability from the Japanese government [2] - Concerns were raised about the reduction of "comfort women" content in educational materials, which contributes to a distorted understanding of history within Japanese society [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's stance on historical issues related to Japan's wartime actions, particularly in the context of the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II, highlighting the need for Japan to acknowledge its past and the consequences of its actions [1]. Summary by Relevant Sections - Historical Context - The article notes that 80 years ago, Japan accepted the Potsdam Declaration and unconditionally surrendered, marking a significant moment in history [1]. - It references international documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration, which outline Japan's war responsibilities and the requirement to return territories stolen from China, including Taiwan [1]. - Current Issues - The article discusses ongoing attempts by certain Japanese factions to beautify and deny the historical invasions, as well as to distort and revise history, which is viewed as a challenge to the post-war international order and the United Nations Charter [1]. - It stresses that only by confronting history can respect be gained, and that learning from the past is essential to prevent future conflicts [1]. - Call to Action - The article urges Japan to make the right choices regarding its historical narrative and responsibilities [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's stance on historical issues related to Japan's wartime actions, particularly the need for Japan to acknowledge its past and the consequences of its militaristic actions during World War II [1]. Summary by Sections - Historical Context: The article highlights that 80 years ago, Japan surrendered unconditionally, marking a significant moment in history where Japan's militarism caused immense suffering in China and other Asian countries [1]. - International Agreements: It references key international documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration, which outline Japan's war responsibilities and the requirement to return territories, including Taiwan, to China [1]. - Current Issues: The article criticizes certain Japanese factions for attempting to beautify their invasion history, deny their wartime actions, and even rehabilitate war criminals, which is seen as a challenge to the post-war international order and the principles of the United Nations [1]. - Call for Acknowledgment: It stresses the importance of acknowledging history to gain respect and prevent future conflicts, urging Japan to make the right choices regarding its historical narrative [1].