日本律师 内田雅敏：战后日本的复兴是基于什么实现的，那就是不打仗，不把大量资金投入军备，正是基于这样的原则一路走来。而如果日本改变这一 点，将会变成怎样的社会？如果失去历史这一纵向坐标，只从当下来思考问题 ，日本会非常危险。那将向亚洲表明，日本并没有对历史进行真正的反省。 内田雅敏指出，日本战后发展离不开和平道路。如果日本政府背离这一原则，忽视战争历史的教训，不断推动扩军，将给日本带来危险。 围绕日本首相高市早苗的错误言论以及持续推动扩军的相关动向，日本国内有识之士指出，日本政府应当恪守战后确立的和平发展道路，遵守日中两国达成 的政治共识，正视历史、以史为鉴，避免因错误言行损害地区和平与稳定。 日本律师 内田雅敏：如果考虑到日中四个政治文件，这种发言是根本不可能成立的，因为文件已经确认台湾是中国的一部分，因此台湾是中国的内政问 题。我认为高市错误言论完全是无视历史事实，不理解历史背景的表现。 ...

转自：扬子晚报 2025年9月至11月，俄联邦总检察院撤销上世纪90年代对14名日本公民作出的"平反"决定。他们在第二 次世界大战期间乃至1945年日本投降后，参与针对苏联的破坏和间谍活动。俄方相关机构复核后，认定 这些人不符合"平反"条件，其罪行已被证实。 2025年11月18日、20日、27日，扎哈罗娃三度发声，对日本近期的危险行径严厉批评。 从直指日本首相高市早苗涉台言论的"危险"，要求其汲取二战历史教训，到点出日本"至今不反省自身 的错误"，再到揭露日本在周边岛屿部署进攻性武器、甘当美国"军事棋子"，俄方批评从言论警告延伸 至军事行动追责，既戳破了日本高市政府否认历史的恶劣本质，也直指其行为对地区安全稳定的严重威 胁。 今年1月30日，扎哈罗娃表示，俄方持续开展揭露日本军国主义在苏联伟大卫国战争时期所犯罪行的相 关工作。"这项工作已推进多年，新的相关信息仍不断涌现。这足以印证日本军国主义行径给亚洲各国 人民带来的悲剧。" 据央视新闻2月20日报道，俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃日前接受总台记者专访时表示，第二次世界大 战期间日本站在了历史错误的一边。她强调，日本必须正视历史、深刻反省，历史不容被篡改。 " ...

Core Viewpoint - The articles highlight the ongoing debate regarding Japan's historical acknowledgment of the Nanjing Massacre, emphasizing the need for Japan to confront its wartime actions and the implications of denying historical facts [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Acknowledgment - Japanese journalist Yamamura Yoichi asserts that while some aspects of the Nanjing Massacre were reported by Japanese media, many atrocities were ignored, indicating a need for historical truth [1]. - Matsumoto Tamaki, president of the Japan Meishin Association, calls for the Japanese government to deeply reflect on its war crimes and to acknowledge historical facts, arguing that distorting history for national interests is unjust [1]. Group 2: International Reactions - International figures criticize Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's statements as historically inaccurate, suggesting they undermine international order and regional stability [1]. - Italian legal scholar Diliberto emphasizes the severity of Japan's historical denial, stating that the Nanjing Massacre, where 300,000 people were killed in a matter of weeks, must not be erased from memory [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the contrasting historical recognition and attitudes between Japan and Germany, particularly in the context of World War II, with Germany focusing on acknowledging its past and Japan, under the influence of right-wing forces, attempting to obscure its war crimes [1][3]. Group 1: Historical Recognition - Germany is committed to remembering its wartime responsibilities and working towards reconciliation with other nations, contributing to the European integration process [1]. - In contrast, Japan, particularly under Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo, is seen as avoiding and obscuring its war crimes, which raises concerns among European media and analysts regarding regional stability in Asia [1][5]. Group 2: Political Implications - High-profile statements and actions by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi, including erroneous remarks related to Taiwan and refusal to acknowledge historical wrongs, are viewed as detrimental to peace and stability in the region [1][5]. - European analysts express that Kishi's revisionist stance on Japan's wartime history could damage Japan's credibility in the eyes of Western nations [3][5].

Group 1 - Germany's Chancellor Merz emphasized the importance of remembering historical responsibilities regarding World War II atrocities committed by Nazi Germany against Poland during recent intergovernmental consultations [1][2] - The German government announced plans to build a permanent memorial in Berlin for Polish citizens who suffered during World War II, symbolizing remembrance and reconciliation between Germany and Poland [4] - Germany's historical approach has focused on acknowledging and reflecting on its past, which has facilitated its reintegration into Europe and the promotion of European unity [5][6] Group 2 - In contrast to Germany, Japan's current Prime Minister Kishi has been criticized for his revisionist stance on World War II history, raising concerns among European nations about regional stability [9] - European scholars and media have noted that Japan's historical denial and glorification of wartime actions could negatively impact its credibility in the West and threaten peace in Asia [9]

Core Viewpoint - The recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have been condemned by the Social Democratic Party of Japan, highlighting concerns over regional peace and urging the Japanese government to confront historical realities [2][4]. Group 1: Political Reactions - The Social Democratic Party's national joint secretary, Hiroshi Yamashiro, expressed strong anger over Takaichi's comments, stating that such statements could provoke unnecessary conflict and drag Japan into war [4]. - Yamashiro emphasized that Japan, as a nation with a pacifist constitution, must not allow such provocations and should acknowledge its historical responsibilities [6]. Group 2: Historical Context - Yamashiro pointed out that Japan recognized the Chinese government as the sole legitimate government during the normalization of diplomatic relations in 1972, which included an understanding that Taiwan is part of China [4][6]. - He criticized the Japanese education system for failing to teach the historical context of Japan's wartime actions, which has led to a lack of awareness and reflection on past aggressions [6]. Group 3: Implications of Military Intervention - Yamashiro warned that any military intervention in Taiwan, which is considered an internal issue of China, would be viewed as an act of aggression and could lead to severe repercussions for Japan [8]. - He stated that if Japan does not correct its course regarding these remarks, it risks facing negative consequences [6][8].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering historical lessons, particularly regarding Japanese militarism, and condemns recent statements by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan as a potential justification for collective self-defense, reflecting a dangerous historical perspective [1][2]. Group 1 - Takaichi's remarks about Taiwan represent a revival of militaristic views in Japan, which are rooted in a distorted understanding of history [1][2]. - The article highlights the atrocities committed by Japanese troops during the Nanjing Massacre, illustrating the historical context that informs current political rhetoric [1]. - There is a contrast drawn between Takaichi and other Japanese politicians who acknowledge and reflect on Japan's wartime actions, suggesting a divide in contemporary Japanese political thought [2][3]. Group 2 - The article recalls the visits of former Japanese Prime Ministers who have shown remorse for Japan's wartime actions, indicating that there are still voices in Japan advocating for a correct understanding of history [2]. - It stresses that denying historical facts does not erase them, and that recognizing the truth is essential for peace and reconciliation between China and Japan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama emphasizes the importance of acknowledging historical events and learning from them, particularly in the context of Japan's past actions during the war [1]. Group 1 - Yukio Hatoyama expresses gratitude for being invited to the 80th anniversary commemorative event of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War [1]. - He participates in the event with a serious mindset, reflecting on the need for Japan to confront its historical actions [1]. - Hatoyama conveys a sense of reflection and apology as a Japanese individual and former Prime Minister while attending the commemorative event [1]. Group 2 - He highlights the profound historical significance and contemporary relevance of President Xi Jinping's speech during the commemorative event [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson emphasized the historical atrocities committed by the Japanese military during World War II, particularly the use of biological warfare and inhumane human experiments, as revealed by recently declassified Russian documents [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Historical Atrocities**: The spokesperson highlighted that the Japanese military openly violated international law during World War II by conducting biological warfare against the Chinese people, committing heinous human experiments, and perpetrating crimes against humanity [1] - **Call for Reflection**: The statement urged Japan to deeply reflect on its history of aggression, respect the feelings of the victims from China and other affected countries, and take concrete actions to sever ties with militarism to avoid repeating past mistakes [1] - **Significance of Historical Awareness**: The spokesperson noted that acknowledging history is essential for gaining respect, learning from the past is crucial for paving the future, and remembering past events is vital to prevent falling into the same pitfalls again [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes the ongoing struggle for recognition and justice regarding the "comfort women" issue, with both South Korea and Japan holding events to address historical grievances and advocate for victims' rights [1][2] - In South Korea, various commemorative activities took place, including a significant event in Seoul attended by over 200 participants, highlighting the government's commitment to a victim-centered approach [1] - The South Korean government has officially registered 240 "comfort women" victims, with only 6 still alive, underscoring the urgency of addressing their plight and restoring their dignity [1] Group 2 - In Japan, civil society groups organized protests demanding the government acknowledge its historical responsibilities regarding the "comfort women" issue, with participants calling for apologies and reparations for the victims [2] - The protests included readings of testimonies from "comfort women," emphasizing the need for historical accuracy and accountability from the Japanese government [2] - Concerns were raised about the reduction of "comfort women" content in educational materials, which contributes to a distorted understanding of history within Japanese society [2]