Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court has ordered former President Jair Bolsonaro to be placed under house arrest due to violations involving the use of social media to incite attacks on the court and support foreign interference in Brazil's judicial system [1][2] - Bolsonaro is prohibited from using social media directly or indirectly, and must wear an electronic ankle monitor while under house arrest [2] - The court has indicated that Bolsonaro's actions necessitate stricter measures to prevent further offenses [1][2] Legal Proceedings - Bolsonaro faces multiple charges, including attempting to instigate a coup and participating in armed criminal organizations, with potential sentences exceeding 40 years if all charges are upheld [3][5] - The Supreme Court had previously planned to hear all testimonies by June 13, but expedited the process, completing it by June 10 [3] - The investigation into the January 8 events, where Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings, has led to serious legal repercussions for Bolsonaro and his associates [5] Political Context - The U.S. government has been involved, with reports of Bolsonaro's family attempting to influence U.S. sanctions against Brazilian officials, which has drawn criticism from the Brazilian government [2] - Brazilian President Lula has firmly rejected U.S. interference in domestic affairs, emphasizing the importance of national sovereignty and judicial independence [2] - Bolsonaro has been barred from running for any elections until 2030, disqualifying him from the 2026 presidential election [7]

Core Viewpoint - Colombian President Petro criticized U.S. Secretary of State Rubio's comments regarding the conviction of former President Uribe, claiming it interferes with Colombia's judicial matters and infringes on national sovereignty [1] Group 1: Political Context - The Colombian Foreign Minister, Rosa Biabey, emphasized the country's judicial independence in response to the U.S. Secretary of State's remarks [1] - The Colombian Criminal Circuit Court found former President Uribe guilty of "criminal bribery" and "procedural fraud," while the charge of "simple bribery" was not established [1]

Group 1 - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court is not compromising on the criminal case against former President Bolsonaro despite threats from the U.S. government [1] - The U.S. State Department announced visa restrictions on Brazilian Supreme Court judges, citing "political persecution" against Bolsonaro [1] - Brazilian President Lula stated that U.S. interference in judicial matters is unacceptable, indicating a joint determination with the Supreme Court to resist U.S. demands [1] Group 2 - The Brazilian Attorney General's Office is investigating potential insider trading related to tariffs announced by former President Trump [2] - The investigation includes a request to the Supreme Court to incorporate insider trading allegations against Bolsonaro's son, Eduardo [2] - Eduardo Bolsonaro's attacks on the Supreme Court are being investigated for potential U.S. involvement in leveraging these attacks for gain [2]

Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court has ordered former President Bolsonaro to wear an electronic ankle monitor due to allegations of judicial coercion and threats to national sovereignty [1][3] - Bolsonaro expressed that the imposition of the ankle monitor is a "great humiliation" and denied any intentions to leave Brazil or seek asylum [3] - Brazilian President Lula condemned the U.S. threats of sanctions against the Brazilian judiciary as arbitrary and an infringement on national sovereignty [3][4] Summary by Sections - **Judicial Actions Against Bolsonaro** - The Supreme Court's ruling includes restrictions on Bolsonaro's movements, requiring him to wear an electronic ankle monitor and limiting his ability to leave home during specified hours [3] - Bolsonaro faces serious criminal charges related to alleged attempts to instigate a coup following his electoral defeat in 2022, with potential sentences exceeding 40 years if convicted [3] - **International Relations and Reactions** - Lula's administration has strongly opposed U.S. interference in Brazil's internal affairs, particularly regarding the judicial investigation into Bolsonaro [4] - The U.S. has announced a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods, further escalating tensions between the two nations [4]

美国对巴西最高法院法官实施签证限制。 在巴西联邦最高法院裁定对前总统博索纳罗采取限制措施后，美国国务院18日发布公告，宣布对巴西联邦 最高法院法官亚历山大·德莫赖斯等人实施签证限制。 公告说，德莫赖斯对博索纳罗发起"政治迫害"，对后者进行了影响广泛的"镇压与审查"，由此美国国务卿 鲁比奥下令立即对德莫赖斯及其"在最高法院内盟友以及他们的直系亲属"实施签证撤销措施。 END 近期，美国总统特朗普要求巴西停止对博索纳罗的司法调查，引发巴西政府和舆论强烈不满。巴西总统卢 拉坚决回击美国干涉内政的行为，强调巴西将坚定捍卫主权和司法独立。 综合自：新华社、央视新闻 责编：万健祎 校对： 陶谦 版权声明 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体 法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes 德莫赖斯18日裁定，前总统博索纳罗存在胁迫司法、妨碍司法、公然危害国家主权的行为，下令对博索纳 罗采取限制措施。巴西联邦最高法院下令，博索纳罗必须戴电子脚镣接受行程监控；每周一至周五晚7时 至次日早6时不得外出，周末及节假日则需全天居 ...

此前，博索纳罗因涉嫌在2022年总统选举失利后企图政变而受到刑事指控。指控内容包括组织武装犯 罪、试图暴力推翻民主法治、政变、暴力威胁及损坏公共财产。若所有罪名成立，刑期可超40年。案件 审理期间，博索纳罗多次通过社交媒体发声，坚称此为"政治迫害"。 近期，美国总统特朗普宣布将对巴西征收50%的关税，并要求巴西停止对博索纳罗的司法调查，引发巴 西政府和舆论强烈不满。巴西总统卢拉坚决回击美国干涉内政的行为，强调巴西将坚定捍卫主权和司法 独立。 来源：新华社，原文标题：《巴西联邦最高法院裁定前总统博索纳罗危害国家主权》 风险提示及免责条款 巴西联邦最高法院法官亚历山大·德莫赖斯18日裁定，前总统博索纳罗存在胁迫司法、妨碍司法、公然 危害国家主权的行为，下令对博索纳罗采取限制措施。 联邦最高法院下令，博索纳罗必须戴电子脚镣接受行程监控；每周一至周五晚7时至次日早6时不得外 出，周末及节假日则需全天居家软禁；此外，禁止他与外国官员、外交官联络以及使用社交媒体。 巴西警方18日搜查博索纳罗在巴西利亚的住所。警方消息和联邦最高法院的声明显示，博索纳罗父子近 几个月常与美国政府官员接触，试图促使美国对巴西官员实施制裁。他们 ...

Group 1: Immigration Enforcement and Legal Conflicts - The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been conducting raids in Los Angeles, leading to clashes with local residents and the deployment of the National Guard by President Trump, marking the first time since 1965 that a president has mobilized state National Guard without a governor's request [2] - California's government has initiated a lawsuit against the Trump administration to block the use of military and National Guard in law enforcement activities within the state [2] - The legal battles between the executive and judicial branches in the U.S. have intensified, with over 300 lawsuits filed against the Trump administration since January, covering various issues including tariffs and immigration policies [2] Group 2: Tariff Lawsuits - The Trump administration's imposition of tariffs has led to at least seven lawsuits from various parties, including state governments and small businesses [3] - A coalition of 12 states filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's "reciprocal tariffs," which was initially ruled illegal by a trade court, but the administration successfully appealed to temporarily suspend this ruling [3][4] - Legal experts predict that many of these tariff-related lawsuits will ultimately reach the Supreme Court, where Trump's appointed justices may play a crucial role [4] Group 3: Harvard University Lawsuit - The Trump administration's threat to freeze federal funding to Harvard University has escalated into a significant legal battle, with Harvard filing a lawsuit against the government [5] - The conflict represents a broader struggle between elite educational institutions and the Trump administration, which has sought to exert control over higher education [5] - Recent actions by the Department of Homeland Security to restrict international student admissions at Harvard have been temporarily halted, but further legal challenges are expected [7] Group 4: Broader Immigration Legal Issues - Multiple lawsuits are ongoing regarding immigration policies, including a recent ruling that deemed Trump's federalization of California's National Guard illegal without the governor's consent [10] - The Supreme Court is expected to hear cases related to the termination of temporary legal status for immigrants from specific countries, which could affect over 500,000 individuals [12] - The Trump administration's efforts to link federal funding to immigration enforcement have also faced legal challenges from multiple states [14] Group 5: Government Efficiency Department Lawsuits - The establishment of the Government Efficiency Department has led to numerous lawsuits regarding budget cuts and employee layoffs, with over 40 cases reported [15] - A federal court has issued a temporary injunction against the department's mass layoffs, which has been extended indefinitely [16] - The Trump administration has faced legal challenges regarding its decision to cut federal funding to public media, with lawsuits filed by major public broadcasting organizations [18] Group 6: Supreme Court Dynamics - The Trump administration's legal challenges are likely to reach the Supreme Court, where the current conservative majority may influence outcomes [20][23] - Trump's appointments of three conservative justices have created a favorable environment for the administration in legal disputes [20] - Analysts suggest that the Supreme Court's decisions may reflect the increasing polarization of American politics, complicating the judicial landscape [23]