Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the declining reputation and increasing criticism of 5A tourist attractions in China, highlighting the disparity between the quantity of these attractions and their quality, leading to a perception of many being "watered down" or not deserving of the 5A designation [6][9][15]. Group 1: Overview of 5A Scenic Areas - The number of 5A scenic areas has increased from 66 in 2007 to 358 by 2024, but the quality has not kept pace with this growth [9][21]. - Early 5A scenic areas like the Summer Palace and the Great Wall were once popular, but many newer additions have faced scrutiny and criticism [7][10]. - Social media has highlighted the most controversial 5A scenic areas, with significant complaints about attractions like Tianya Haijiao and Yellow Crane Tower, which have been described as disappointing [9][10]. Group 2: Quality Concerns - Many 5A scenic areas are criticized for their lack of authenticity and quality, with visitors feeling misled by the marketing of these attractions [10][17]. - The article cites specific examples of poor experiences at various 5A sites, such as overpriced and subpar food and inadequate facilities [12][20]. - A study from Sun Yat-sen University indicates that visitors to cultural attractions prioritize the quality of cultural and atmospheric experiences over ticket prices and services [14]. Group 3: Evaluation Criteria for 5A Designation - The criteria for achieving 5A status focus more on service and environmental quality rather than the actual scenic quality, with a scoring system that emphasizes infrastructure over natural beauty [21][22]. - The evaluation process has been criticized for allowing attractions with less impressive natural features to achieve 5A status simply by improving facilities [22][26]. - The article notes that many attractions that have received 5A status are located in easily accessible urban areas, which may skew the evaluation process in their favor [25][26]. Group 4: Public Sentiment and Future Outlook - There is a growing public sentiment that the 5A designation has lost its significance, leading to calls for a new classification system, such as a proposed "6A" rating for truly exceptional attractions [36][37]. - The article highlights that despite the criticisms, some attractions like Jiuzhaigou are still regarded highly due to their natural beauty and effective management practices [37][40]. - The ongoing issues with management and visitor experience at many 5A sites suggest a need for reform in how these attractions are evaluated and maintained [28][29].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing number of 5A-rated tourist attractions in China, questioning their quality and authenticity as many new additions seem to lack the expected standards and have received criticism from visitors [4][9][18]. Group 1: Overview of 5A Scenic Areas - The first batch of 5A scenic areas was established in 2007, including famous sites like the Summer Palace and the Great Wall [5]. - By 2015, the number of 5A scenic areas had more than doubled, with a concentration in easily accessible regions like Beijing and the Yangtze River Delta [6]. - As of 2024, there are 358 5A scenic areas across the country, marking a peak in new additions [7][9]. Group 2: Quality Concerns - Despite the increase in quantity, the quality of many 5A scenic areas has declined, leading to public dissatisfaction [9][18]. - Notable examples of controversial 5A scenic areas include Tianya Haijiao and Yellow Crane Tower, which have been criticized for not meeting visitor expectations [10][11]. - The article highlights that many visitors feel deceived by the disparity between the advertised experience and the actual offerings of these attractions [10][11]. Group 3: Criticism of New Additions - The recent addition of 19 new 5A scenic areas has sparked significant criticism, with many being labeled as "watered-down" or lacking authenticity [18][19]. - Examples of criticized areas include Hengshui Lake, which is perceived as a generic park, and Zhoucun Ancient Commercial Street, which is seen as overly commercialized [21][22]. - The article notes that the criteria for becoming a 5A scenic area focus more on infrastructure and service quality rather than the uniqueness of the attractions [26][28]. Group 4: Visitor Experience Issues - Many 5A scenic areas face operational challenges, including poor management, cleanliness issues, and excessive commercialization, especially during peak tourist seasons [37][39]. - Visitors often report long wait times, inadequate facilities, and high prices for subpar food, leading to a negative overall experience [39][42]. - The article suggests that the disparity between the 5A rating and actual visitor experiences has led to calls for a new classification system, such as a proposed "6A" rating to better reflect quality [43][45].