除主力模型外，火山引擎同步发布图像创作模型Doubao-Seedream-4.5和视频生成模型Seedance系列，进一步完善多模态能力版图。新推出的Seedance-1.0-Pro 支持2至12秒1080P自由生成，可实现多人语言对白和多镜头叙事。 火山引擎正式推出"AI节省计划"，一次加入即可覆盖豆包大模型、视频图像创作模型及第三方开源大模型，支持全预付、零预付等灵活付款方式。开源证券研报 指出，此次发布有望推动AI在企业生产场景中的落地应用。 豆包大模型1.8具备更强的多模态Agent能力，256K超长上下文使其能够处理更复杂的信息，擅长处理复杂多步任务。火山引擎正式发布的"AI节省计划"，普惠覆盖豆包大模型、豆 包视频及图像创作模型与第三方开源大模型，全面优化用户调用成本，最高节省幅度达47%。 | | | 编辑 | 硬 AI 火山引擎在2025原动力大会上发布豆包大模型1.8，具备更强的多模态Agent能力，256K超长上下文和原生API上下文管理，擅长处理复杂多步任务。 火山引擎总裁谭待在12月18日的大会上透露，平台"万亿Tokens俱乐部"成员已突破100家。并披露豆包大模型日均使用量超50万 ...

Core Viewpoint - Augment Code has changed its pricing model from a message-based system to a usage-based system, leading to significant cost increases for users, with some reporting over a 10-fold increase in expenses [2][10][21]. Pricing Model Changes - The initial pricing model was based on the number of messages sent, with tiers allowing different message limits for free and paid users. The new model is based on a points system, where users receive a certain number of points to use for AI interactions [3][4][5]. - The previous pricing structure included a free version, a $50 developer version, a $100 professional version, and a $250 max version, which have now been replaced with a simpler model offering a $20 indie version and a $60 standard version [3][7]. User Reactions - Users have expressed dissatisfaction with the new pricing, feeling that they are being excluded after helping to optimize the system during its early stages. Some users have calculated their costs under the new model and found them to be prohibitively high [10][11][14]. - Complaints have arisen regarding the fairness of the new pricing model, as it does not accurately reflect the varying complexities of different AI tasks, leading to perceived inequities among users [15][16]. Industry Context - The CEO of Augment Code stated that the previous message-based pricing model was unsustainable and that usage-based pricing is becoming an industry standard, citing competitors like Zed and Replit [15][16]. - The shift in pricing reflects broader challenges in the AI coding assistant market, where companies face high operational costs and pressure to provide advanced AI capabilities while maintaining profitability [22][24][26]. Competitive Landscape - Augment Code claims a win rate of over 80% in the market, focusing on enterprise-level software engineers rather than casual developers. The company aims to differentiate itself through its context engine, which is designed to handle complex codebases [19][20]. - The competitive environment is intense, with many startups in the AI coding space struggling with profitability due to high costs associated with using large language models [22][24][26].

Core Insights - Augment Code has changed its pricing model from a message-based system to a usage-based system, leading to cost increases of over 10 times for some users [1][9][11] - The company claims the previous pricing model was unsustainable and does not accurately reflect the operational costs associated with AI usage [3][11] - The new pricing structure includes a points-based system where users receive credits based on their usage, with different tiers for individual and enterprise users [3][5][12] Pricing Changes - The initial pricing model allowed free users to send 50 messages per month, with paid tiers offering 600, 1500, and 4500 messages for $50, $100, and $250 respectively [1][7] - The new model offers a monthly fee of $20 for an indie version with 125 messages, and $60 for a standard version with unlimited chat and code completion [2][3][5] - Users have reported significant cost increases under the new model, with one user noting a conversion of 31 messages to 40,982 points, indicating a cost increase of over 10 times [9][12] User Reactions - Some users have expressed dissatisfaction with the new pricing, comparing it unfavorably to other tools and suggesting it may drive them away from the platform [2][10] - Concerns have been raised that the company may not have a substantial enterprise user base, as many organizations are hesitant to adopt such AI coding tools [10][12] - The CEO defended the pricing changes by stating that usage-based billing is becoming an industry standard and that the previous model was unfair and lacked transparency [11][12] Competitive Landscape - The AI coding assistant market is highly competitive, with companies like Zed, Replit, and Cursor also adjusting their pricing models [11][12] - Augment Code claims a win rate of over 80% in the market, focusing on enterprise-level software engineers rather than casual developers [13][14] - The industry faces challenges related to high operational costs associated with AI processing, which may impact profitability across various coding assistant startups [16][17]