Core Viewpoint - The concept of "slash enterprises," akin to "slash youth," reflects companies that operate across multiple unrelated fields, which may not guarantee long-term success due to the inherent complexities and differences in various industries [1][3] Group 1: Business Strategy - Companies often pursue a "slash" model to capture new growth opportunities and mitigate risks from intensified competition in single sectors, but this approach can lead to increased organizational and management costs [1][3] - Successful companies like Bosch, ASML, and Fanuc focus on core competencies, achieving excellence in their respective fields rather than diversifying into unrelated areas [2] Group 2: Industry Examples - Gree Electric, Fuyao Glass, and CATL exemplify firms that concentrate their resources on specific products, achieving global leadership in their niches through efficiency and technological advancement [2] - Apple, Boeing, and Airbus illustrate the importance of deep social division of labor, relying on specialized suppliers for components while focusing on design and assembly [2] Group 3: Modern Challenges - The attempt to cover the entire supply chain with a few "slash enterprises" reflects a flawed understanding of division of labor, particularly in fast-evolving sectors like AI and biotechnology [3] - The AI computing industry highlights the value of collaboration and specialization, where companies focus on their strengths and work together through standardized interfaces to enhance overall system efficiency [3] Group 4: Recommendations - Companies should return to a capability-driven approach, concentrating on core businesses to build sustainable competitive advantages, while industries should embrace openness and collaboration to foster resilience [3] - Encouraging the development of "hidden champions" and specialized enterprises can enhance overall competitiveness by forming a network based on comparative advantages [3]