Does Europe become a consumer of US and Chinese AI or a producer and builder of AI. >> Today I think this is clearly a consumer. If you look at the overall AI ecosystem in Europe, it's very weak in any way you look at it.And you know today there could be a debate about will the US or China win the AI race. I think it's clear who is losing it today. It's Europe. Europe is behind.And it's true with semiconductor, right. If you look at semiconductor basically take our shipment the shipment of our system to Eur ...

To me, Dave, one of the more interesting um dynamics when the market as of late has been what's going on in big tech, right. We saw a pullback in big tech. We saw have seen sort of an uneven recovery, but there's also this rotation within big tech or at least a perception of changing leadership to some degree.Um, and I'm just curious what your thoughts are on that. >> I think there's kind of two catalysts that are occurring at the same time. So to your point the the broader environment saw a big pullback aw ...

RT Luke Gromen (@LukeGromen)🧵: The US will not be able to reshore, rebuild its grid, & will lose the AI race & great power competition v. China unless US skilled trades & engineers receive positive real wage growth v. essentials like housing, healthcare, college, etc.The US will lose if👇continues. 1/ https://t.co/bKxTOkuwKg ...

RT BowTiedRanger (@BowTiedRanger)Send 1 trillion H1B Indians to Israel immediately. I don’t want them to fall behind in the big AI race. ...

AI Development Strategy - China is wagering that a 'swarm' approach can overcome the technological and financial advantages of the US in the AI race [1] Technological Landscape - China lacks the chip technology possessed by the United States [1] Financial Resources - China does not have the private financial resources of America [1]

Core Viewpoint - Intel's stock is rising following Elon Musk's comments about a potential partnership and plans for a large chip fabrication facility, indicating a possible turnaround for Intel's foundry business after years of challenges [1][2]. Group 1: Intel's Business and Market Position - Intel has been attempting to relaunch its foundry business for nearly five years, investing hundreds of billions of dollars, and is now under pressure to secure actual customers [1][2]. - The potential partnership with Musk could signify that Intel's strategy is nearing fruition, especially as manufacturing becomes crucial in the AI sector [2][10]. - The majority of advanced chip manufacturing capacity is currently located in Taiwan and South Korea, making the return of this capability to the U.S. significant for national security and economic leverage [3]. Group 2: Technological Challenges and Competitors - Intel's latest manufacturing process, known as 14A, aims to compete with TSMC at the leading edge of technology, and securing a deal with a major player would be a significant achievement [4][10]. - Advanced chip manufacturing is highly complex, requiring not just infrastructure but also engineering expertise, which poses a challenge for Intel [6][7]. - The competition is fierce, with companies like Apple previously moving away from Intel chips, highlighting the need for Intel to regain credibility in the market [9][10]. Group 3: Strategic Partnerships and Political Implications - Intel has reportedly approached Apple for a strategic investment, which could help Apple diversify away from TSMC and align with U.S. manufacturing goals [5]. - The involvement of the U.S. government as a stakeholder in Intel's efforts underscores the political dimensions of the semiconductor industry [3][8].

Risk Assessment & Technological Advancement - The company excels at managing technology and product design risks [2][3] - Geopolitical risk is a significant and uncontrollable concern for the company [3][4] AI Development & Competition - The US and China are close in overall AI development, varying by technology stack layer [5] - China leads in energy, while the US leads in chips [5][6] - US models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini) are generally better, but China's open-source models are ahead [6] - China's applications are advancing rapidly due to a quick adoption rate and less industrial regulation [6][7] Strategic Considerations for AI Leadership - A nuanced strategy is needed to balance maintaining a lead in advanced chips with enabling global AI developers to build on the American tech stack [9][11] - The US aims to ensure America and its allies have access to the most advanced AI chips [10] - Preventing others from building on the American tech stack risks creating parallel AI ecosystems [15] - The goal is for the American tech stack to account for 80% of the world in five years to win the AI race [16] - Isolating American technology and forfeiting the global market would hinder America's AI leadership [17] - China represents 30% of the technology market with a billion users, making it a crucial market [16][17]

David, there is something that I've wanted to talk to you about for a long time and we will get to it. The debate around should the United States or should the United States not export some form of AI chip to China and we will get to it. But I'm sure you can appreciate, you know, the AMD and open AI agreement is very interesting.And so as a place to start, could I just ask your sort of interpretation of what it signals when you have a US chip maker like AMD after Nvidia and one of the frontier model shops l ...

RT Bloomberg Live (@BloombergLive)The latest edition to the #BBGAsean program is @Google’s Eunice Huang who will join @OpenAI’s James Hairston onstage for a live discussion on the global AI race.Find out how to join us in October ⬇️ ...

Government Intervention & AI Race - The primary strategic objective should be winning the AI race, and the government should align behind this goal [1][2] - A 15% stake in Intel might boost the stock price but may not effectively enhance Intel's competitiveness in the AI race [2] - The government's involvement should focus on helping companies compete and win in AI, extending beyond Nvidia to sectors like mining and energy [7] - Micromanaging companies through board involvement could be problematic; discipline and strategic focus are crucial for success [8] State Capitalism & Investor Confidence - State-guided capitalism, while potentially beneficial, raises concerns about governance and investor confidence if the government becomes too involved in company management [6][7] - The concept of state intervention is inherently political, and the government's tactics need refinement to avoid hindering competition [3][7] - The downside of government intervention is the potential impact on governance and investor confidence [7] Pharmaceutical Sector & Other Considerations - The pharmaceutical sector is one to watch, especially with tariff threats of 100% and potential government involvement to equalize prices [12][13] - Government involvement in pharmaceuticals could become necessary if the president feels the need for more intervention, though it is not preferred [13]