Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required. The tech giant will pay the news company between $20 million and $25 million per year for content to train its AI models, The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Wednesday (July 30), citing unnamed sources. Amazon's artificial intelligence licensing deal with The New York Times reportedly carries an eight-figure annual price tag. By completing this form, you agree to receive marketi ...

Social Media Platform Dynamics - Account visibility decreased due to suspected content infringement [1] - Tweet impressions and data metrics experienced a sharp decline starting approximately two weeks prior [1] - Account penalty likely resulted from posting non-original, re-uploaded videos [1] Content Moderation Policies - Platform's system identifies and penalizes accounts for copyright infringement when re-uploading content [1] - Account has previously been penalized for similar content-related issues [1] Account Recovery - Estimated recovery time from the penalty is approximately one to two months [1]

Core Viewpoint - Disney and Universal have initiated legal action against Midjourney for allegedly using their copyrighted content without permission to train its generative AI models [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and includes numerous examples of images generated by Midjourney that feature copyrighted characters from Disney and Universal, such as Homer Simpson and Darth Vader [2]. - The studios are seeking monetary damages, a jury trial, and an injunction to prevent further copyright infringement by Midjourney [3]. Group 2: Industry Context - Tech companies, including OpenAI, are advocating for legal protections that would allow them to train AI models on publicly available works, including copyrighted materials, without needing permission or compensation to the original creators [4]. - Some film and television studios have begun to explore generative AI technology, but their efforts have been relatively limited compared to the broader industry push [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Walt Disney Co. and NBCUniversal have filed a lawsuit against AI company Midjourney, claiming that its image-generating service infringes on their copyrights by producing unauthorized copies of their characters [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, marks the first significant legal action taken by studios against an AI company [1]. - Disney and NBCUniversal are seeking unspecified maximum statutory damages, an accounting of Midjourney's proceeds from the alleged infringement, and injunctive relief [2]. Group 2: Examples of Infringement - The lawsuit provides examples where Midjourney generates high-quality images of Disney's Darth Vader and NBCU's Minions character based on simple text prompts from subscribers [3]. Group 3: AI Training and Copyright Issues - The lawsuit discusses the contentious issue of using copyrighted material to train AI models, highlighting that Midjourney is likely infringing on copyrights as it prepares to launch a new video service [4]. - The Motion Picture Association has stated that existing copyright laws are adequate to address issues related to AI and piracy, emphasizing the need for courts to determine the fairness of using copyrighted content in training models [4]. Group 4: Statements from Company Executives - Disney's senior executive emphasized the importance of copyright law in protecting investments in intellectual property, stating that piracy remains piracy regardless of the technology used [4]. - NBCUniversal's general counsel reiterated the significance of creativity in their business and the necessity to protect the work of artists from infringement [4].

Core Viewpoint - Getty Images is taking legal action against Stability AI for allegedly using copyrighted material to train its AI models without permission, which the company views as unfair competition and theft [1][2][3] Group 1: Legal Action - Getty Images is suing Stability AI in both the U.K. and U.S. for copying 12 million images without permission or compensation [3] - The lawsuit claims that Stability AI's actions benefit its commercial interests at the expense of content creators [3] Group 2: Industry Perspective - The CEO of Getty Images, Craig Peters, argues that the AI industry is misusing the concept of innovation to justify the theft of copyrighted material [2] - Peters emphasizes that while competition is welcome, the current practices of some AI firms represent unfair competition [2] Group 3: AI Industry Response - Stability AI contests the legal claims made by Getty Images, asserting that it does not consider them to have merit [3] - The company acknowledges using some images from Getty's websites for training its Stable Diffusion model but denies liability for the claims [3]