Core Viewpoint - Meta Platforms Inc. is facing potential fines from the European Union for not adequately moderating illegal content on its platforms, Facebook and Instagram, as per the EU's Digital Services Act [1][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The European Commission is preparing to issue preliminary findings indicating that Meta's platforms lack an adequate "notice and action mechanism" for users to report illegal posts [2]. - A charge sheet against Meta is expected in the coming weeks, following an investigation that began in April 2024 [3]. - If the findings are confirmed, Meta could face fines of up to 6% of its annual global sales [3]. Group 2: Compliance Requirements - Under the EU's Digital Services Act, platforms with over 45 million monthly active users in the EU must implement robust measures to combat illegal or harmful content [5]. - Meta is currently under investigation for issues related to illegal content, disinformation, and the protection of minors [5]. Group 3: Industry Context - Other major platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and e-commerce sites like Temu and AliExpress, are also facing proceedings under the Digital Services Act [5]. - The EU's regulations on large tech platforms have become a point of contention in its relations with the US, with accusations of unfair targeting of American companies [6].

Apple is asking Europe’s antitrust regulator to do away with its digital protection rule. By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions .Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.In a blog post Thursday (Sept. 25), the tech giant asked the European Commis ...

Alphabet Inc.'s Google is bracing for a second financial penalty under the European Union's sweeping Digital Markets Act (DMA), Reuters reported, as regulators in Brussels prepare a draft decision on ... ...

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Apple and the EU have repeatedly locked horns over the bloc's Digital Markets Act. The European Union rejected a call by Apple to scrap its landmark digital competition law on Thursday, dismissing the US giant's claims that the rules put users' security at risk. Apple and the EU have repeatedly locked horns over the bloc's Dig ...

Apple is blaming the EU's enforcement of the DMA for delaying the launch of some features in the EU, saying the rules are "leading to a worse experience" for Apple customers in the bloc by exposing them to new risks and reducing choices. https://t.co/UkdiDMs5JI ...

Market Analysis by covering: Apple Inc. Read 's Market Analysis on Investing.com ...

Group 1 - Apple has requested European Union regulators to examine the impact of the Digital Markets Act on EU citizens using Apple products [1]

Core Points - The European Union is demanding Big Tech companies, including Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Booking, to explain their actions against online financial scams under the Digital Services Act (DSA) [3][4][5] - The DSA aims to ensure that Big Tech firms take more responsibility in combating illegal content online, with potential investigations and fines for non-compliance [4][5][8] - The EU has already initiated multiple investigations into platforms like Meta's Facebook and Instagram, as well as TikTok and X, under the DSA [8][10] Company Responses - Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Booking have been requested to provide information on how they prevent their services from being exploited by scammers [4][6] - Google reported blocking hundreds of millions of scam-related search results daily, while Booking noted a significant reduction in phishing-related fake reservations from 1.5 million to 250,000 between 2023 and 2024 [6][7] - Microsoft expressed its commitment to creating safe online experiences and plans to engage with the European Commission [6] Regulatory Context - The DSA is part of a broader regulatory framework, including the Digital Markets Act, aimed at ensuring fair competition and protecting users online [8] - The EU has faced criticism from US officials, including former President Trump, who labeled the regulations as censorship, while the EU maintains that illegal activities online should be treated similarly to those in the real world [9] - Ongoing investigations into various platforms, including Musk's X, are expected to conclude in the near future, with potential fines anticipated [10]

Core Insights - A senior EU policy manager at Meta, Christelle Dernon, announced her departure from the company after four years, giving it a "Met Most Expectations" rating in a performance review [1][2] - Dernon played a significant role in campaigns related to the EU's Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act, and coordinated an open letter on AI regulation signed by over 40 CEOs [2][4] Departure Context - Dernon's exit follows the recent departure of another key figure, Monica Allen, who was the director of public policy campaigns in Europe [3][4] - Both departures occur amid increasing regulatory scrutiny faced by Meta in Europe [4] Regulatory Environment - Meta's chief global affairs officer, Joel Kaplan, criticized the EU's approach to AI regulation, labeling it as an "over-reach" that could hinder AI development in Europe [5][6] - In response to new regulations, Meta announced it would cease accepting paid political, electoral, and social-issue advertising across the EU starting in October [7]

Core Viewpoint - A federal judge has ordered changes to Google's business practices to prevent anticompetitive behavior, but has not mandated a breakup of its search business [1][4]. Group 1: Court Orders and Remedies - U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta has outlined remedies that will prevent Google from entering exclusive deals that tie the distribution of its services to other apps or revenue arrangements [2]. - Google is required to share certain search index and user-interaction data with "qualified competitors" and must offer search and search ad syndication services at standard rates [3][4]. - A technical committee will be established to enforce the final judgment, which will last for six years and take effect 60 days after entry [4]. Group 2: DOJ's Position and Proposals - The Department of Justice (DOJ) had advocated for stronger penalties, including the divestiture of Google's Chrome browser and possibly Android, as well as ending agreements with major partners [5]. - The DOJ also requested that Google share its search index, user-side data, and ads data with competitors under privacy-protected terms [6]. Group 3: Market Context and Implications - Google has maintained approximately 90% market share in the traditional search market for the last decade and argues that the government's proposals could stifle innovation and jeopardize user privacy [8]. - Judge Mehta's decision may influence a separate antitrust trial related to Google's advertising technology business, with a remedies trial scheduled for late September [11]. - The ongoing legal proceedings may extend until late 2027 or early 2028, as appeals and potential escalations to the Supreme Court are anticipated [13].