♪ Upbeat whimsical music ♪ [POP] Did you know you can send money right in Messages. In iMessage, on a compatible iPhone, tap the plus icon and select Apple Cash. Enter the amount, then tap Request or Send.Press Send and you're all settled up. ...

来源：环球网 【环球网科技综合报道】12月7日，据外媒BUSINESS INSIDER报道，加拿大流行歌手贾斯汀·比伯近日 因iPhone的语音输入功能怒怼苹果公司，相关言论在社交平台引发热议。12月5日，比伯在社交平台上 发文，宣泄对该功能的不满情绪。他所指的语音输入按钮是iPhone的一项语音转文字功能，用户时常会 不慎触碰到。 比伯在文中写道，"就算我关掉语音输入，也总会误触语音备忘录功能。发送键不该在同一个位置承载 多个功能。"他还附上了iMessage界面的截图，特意标注出语音输入功能。 比伯的帖子收获了数千条支持评论，OpenAI产品设计负责人伊恩·西尔伯也参与其中，向他发出邀 请："正式邀请你参加我们每周的设计评审会。"（旺旺） ...

Feds Warn iPhone Users—Stop Sending Texts From iMessageYour encrypted messages are now under threat. Not only does new commercial spyware put your private content at risk, it can also compromise your phone, providing attackers with access to everything — the keys to your digital life. https://t.co/fEdEWWGDoD ...

Feds Warn iPhone Users—Stop Sending Texts From iMessageYour encrypted messages are now under threat. Not only does new commercial spyware put your private content at risk, it can also compromise your phone, providing attackers with access to everything — the keys to your digital life. https://t.co/fEdEWWHbeb ...

Core Viewpoint - Google has developed a method for its latest Pixel smartphones to exchange images and files with iPhones using Apple's AirDrop protocol, aiming to weaken the exclusivity of Apple's closed ecosystem [1] Group 1: New Feature Development - The new feature allows seamless sharing between Android and iOS devices, emphasizing that device choice should not hinder sharing experiences [1] - Google claims that the feature was developed independently without Apple's involvement, ensuring privacy and security through third-party audits [1][2] Group 2: Functionality and User Experience - iPhone users must set AirDrop to "Everyone for 10 minutes" to receive files from Android devices, with the option to accept or decline requests based on sender information [2] - The feature is currently available on Google's recently released Pixel 10 series and is being rolled out gradually [2] Group 3: Industry Context and Comparisons - Google positions this feature as a consumer-friendly advancement, similar to the rise of RCS (Rich Communication Services), which facilitates high-quality photo and video sharing between iPhone and Android users [3] - Historical attempts by third parties to replicate Apple's features have often been blocked, highlighting the competitive landscape and Apple's control over its ecosystem [3]

Core Viewpoint - The federal judge ruled that Meta's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp did not stifle competition, effectively dismissing the FTC's attempts to reverse these deals, marking a significant legal victory for Meta [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Ruling - U.S. District Judge James Boasberg stated that the FTC failed to demonstrate that Meta holds monopoly power in the personal social networking market or that the acquisitions illegally maintained such a monopoly [2]. - The judge emphasized that without evidence of Meta's dominance in a clearly defined market, the federal challenge could not succeed [2][4]. Group 2: FTC's Argument - The FTC argued that Meta's acquisitions were "killer acquisitions" that eliminated fast-growing competitors and locked users into Meta's ecosystem, following a "buy or bury" strategy [3][4]. - The agency's case relied on a narrow market definition and internal communications from Meta's CEO, which suggested a strategy to acquire rather than compete [4]. Group 3: Meta's Defense - Meta countered the FTC's claims by presenting a broader view of competition, highlighting rivals such as TikTok, YouTube, and Snapchat, asserting that user attention, rather than friend lists, defines the current market [5]. - The judge agreed that excluding TikTok and YouTube undermined the FTC's case, stating that the social media landscape has significantly changed since 2020 [5]. Group 4: Case Background - The case has been ongoing since December 2020, initiated by the Trump-era FTC and 46 states, accusing Facebook of illegally maintaining a monopoly through its acquisitions [6]. - The initial complaint was dismissed in 2021 for lack of evidence, but a revised filing was allowed to proceed in 2022, leading to a lengthy trial involving key figures from Meta [6].

Core Insights - Google, in collaboration with YouGov, conducted a survey comparing the SMS scam protection capabilities of Android and iOS systems, revealing that Android significantly outperforms iPhone in this regard [1][2]. Group 1: Survey Findings - Android users reported a 58% higher likelihood of not receiving any scam messages in the past week compared to iOS users [1]. - iOS users are 65% more likely to receive three or more scam messages weekly than Android users [1]. - The proportion of Android users who consider their device's scam protection "very effective" or "extremely effective" is 20% higher than that of iOS users [2]. Group 2: Device-Specific Insights - Google Pixel users have a 96% higher chance of not receiving any scam messages compared to iPhone users [2]. - In a comparison of four devices, the Google Pixel 10 Pro scored the highest in scam protection capabilities with 31 points, while the iPhone 17 Pro scored the lowest at 23.25 points [4]. Group 3: Technical Analysis - The AI-driven scam protection of Android covers all nine dimensions of protection, while iOS only covers two [3]. - The communication design differences between iOS and Android contribute to the disparity in scam message reception, with iOS's iMessage being a significant target for scammers [10]. - Android's open system allows for deeper collaboration with telecom operators to intercept suspicious messages before they reach users, unlike iOS [10]. Group 4: AI and Protection Mechanisms - Android's localized AI has improved scam detection capabilities, utilizing both "smart cloud interception" and "local interception" modes, which outperform iOS's CoreML model that has limited training data [11]. - The report emphasizes that the technical foundation of Android's scam protection leads to fewer scam encounters for its users compared to iOS users, who are more frequently targeted by scammers [11].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the strategic importance of quantum technology, highlighting its inclusion in China's "14th Five-Year Plan" as a national strategic pillar industry aimed at breakthroughs in quantum communication, quantum computing, and quantum precision measurement [1] Group 1: Quantum Technology Developments - Global companies, including Apple, are increasingly focusing on quantum technology, with Apple announcing a significant upgrade to its iMessage encryption using a post-quantum encryption protocol called PQ3 [3] - Quantum computing is expected to revolutionize encryption methods, as traditional encryption systems may soon reach their limits due to the superior processing capabilities of quantum computers [4][5] - Experts estimate that quantum computing applications could be realized within 7 to 10 years, with potential impacts on various fields such as chemistry, logistics, and energy distribution [7] Group 2: Quantum Computing Principles - Quantum computers operate using quantum bits (qubits) that can exist in a superposition of states, allowing for parallel processing of information [5] - The phenomenon of entanglement in quantum mechanics enables qubits to be interconnected, meaning changes to one qubit can instantly affect others, regardless of distance [5] Group 3: Quantum Communication and Security - Quantum key distribution is a significant application of quantum technology, providing secure generation and transmission of encryption keys, although it faces challenges related to infrastructure and complexity [13] - The launch of the first quantum satellite by Germany and China's successful intercontinental quantum communication link demonstrate advancements in quantum communication technology [9][10] Group 4: Global Initiatives and Regulations - The United Nations has declared 2025 as the "Quantum Year," promoting global awareness of quantum technology [15] - The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is developing post-quantum encryption standards to protect against quantum computer attacks, with plans to transition all sensitive systems to these standards by 2035 [16] - The European Union is investing in quantum research through initiatives like the Quantum Flagship Program, which has a budget of €1 billion to advance quantum technologies [17] Group 5: Industry Implications - Companies across various sectors are increasingly adopting quantum solutions to maintain competitiveness, focusing on quantum encryption and anti-quantum encryption methods [17] - The second quantum revolution is anticipated to bring significant advancements, with more developments expected in the coming years [18]

Core Argument - Apple Inc. is challenging the European Union's Digital Markets Act (DMA), arguing that it imposes excessive burdens that conflict with its rights in the EU marketplace [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Challenge Details - Apple's lawyer claims the DMA imposes "onerous and intrusive burdens" that affect its operations in the EU [1]. - The company is contesting the law on three main fronts: interoperability obligations for rival hardware, the inclusion of its App Store under the DMA, and the investigation into iMessage [2][4][6]. - Apple argues that interoperability requirements could jeopardize user privacy, security, and intellectual property rights [4]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The App Store has faced a €500 million ($581 million) fine for alleged violations of the DMA, which Apple is challenging separately [5]. - Apple previously incurred a €1.8 billion penalty related to allowing developers to direct users to make purchases outside its store [8]. Group 3: Market Impact - The EU's actions against Big Tech have resulted in over €9.5 billion in fines against companies like Alphabet Inc. [9]. - Apple's control over the iPhone has allowed it to secure more than a third of European smartphone users, according to EU commission lawyer Paul-John Loewenthal [3].

Core Viewpoint - Apple criticizes the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA) as an "extremely burdensome and intrusive" regulation that could significantly impact its business and market strategy in Europe [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Challenges - Apple argues that the DMA poses obstacles that are anti-consumer and anti-privacy, making it more difficult to conduct business in Europe [4]. - The company claims that the DMA has caused delays in the release of several features, including real-time translation for AirPods and iPhone mirroring in macOS [4]. - Apple requested the European Commission to abolish the DMA, but this request was denied, and the Commission insisted that Apple cease its challenges to the law [4]. Group 2: Specific Concerns - Apple is challenging the DMA on three fronts: the requirement for competitors' hardware to be compatible with iPhones, the inclusion of the App Store under the DMA, and the investigation into whether iMessage should be included [4]. - The company asserts that the compatibility requirement poses security risks [4]. Group 3: Market Influence - EU lawyer Paul-John Loewenthal highlighted Apple's significant influence in Europe, stating that the company's control over the iPhone allows it to earn "excess profits" in a market where competitors cannot compete equally [5]. - Loewenthal noted that Apple holds the "key" to its ecosystem, determining who can access its platform and services, effectively locking in over one-third of European smartphone users [6].