Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolution and challenges of anonymous social apps in North America, highlighting the need for a unique platform that caters to user expression while addressing issues like online violence and privacy concerns [5][7][29]. Group 1: Historical Context and Market Dynamics - Anonymous social apps have a history in North America, with early examples like "Whisper" and "Secret" gaining significant traction but ultimately failing due to issues like online bullying and content moderation challenges [7][11][17]. - The market for anonymous social apps has seen a shift towards more niche offerings, with some focusing on location-based communities and others on entertainment-driven interactions [7][9]. - Despite the initial popularity, many anonymous apps struggle to survive beyond three years, with a high failure rate attributed to concerns from advertisers and the difficulty in monetizing these platforms [7][11][29]. Group 2: User Behavior and Psychological Aspects - Users, particularly Gen Z, exhibit a strong desire for expression and community, which drives the appeal of anonymous social platforms [13][15]. - The psychological need for emotional release and the ability to discuss sensitive topics anonymously contribute to the ongoing interest in these apps [9][11]. - However, the same demographic is also prone to groupthink and online harassment, leading to a toxic environment that many platforms cannot effectively manage [13][15]. Group 3: Commercialization and Future Opportunities - The article suggests that successful anonymous social apps must find a balance between user engagement and safety, with a focus on creating a positive community [29][34]. - NGL is highlighted as a rare success story, leveraging impulsive consumer behavior and integrating with existing social media platforms like Instagram to maintain user interest [31][33]. - The potential for AI technology to enhance user experience and improve content moderation is noted as a significant opportunity for the future of anonymous social apps [35][37].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap Inc. for allegedly misleading investors about its business prospects, particularly regarding advertising revenue and growth expectations during the specified period [1][2]. Allegations - The complaint claims that Snap's management created a false impression of having reliable information about expected advertising revenue while downplaying macroeconomic instability [2]. - Snap's optimistic reports on advertising growth were found to be misleading, as they were overly reliant on the company's execution capabilities, which were already faltering [2]. Financial Results and Stock Impact - On August 5, 2025, Snap reported a slowdown in advertising revenue growth, attributing it to issues with its ad platform and external factors like the timing of Ramadan [3]. - Following this announcement, Snap's stock price dropped from $9.39 per share to $7.78 per share, marking a decline of over 17% [3]. Class Action Participation - Shareholders may be eligible to participate in the class action against Snap Inc. and can contact Robbins LLP for more information [3]. - Individuals interested in serving as lead plaintiffs are encouraged to reach out, although participation is not required for recovery eligibility [3]. About Robbins LLP - Robbins LLP is a recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, focusing on helping shareholders recover losses and improve corporate governance since 2002 [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Snap Inc. securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, alleging that the company misrepresented its advertising revenue and growth potential during this period [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit claims that Snap's management created a false impression of reliable advertising revenue information while downplaying macroeconomic instability [5]. - The lawsuit alleges that Snap's optimistic reports on advertising growth did not reflect reality, as the company was already facing significant execution errors [5]. - Investors are encouraged to join the class action without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has a history of significant recoveries for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Investors can join the class action by submitting a form or contacting the firm directly [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap Inc. for alleged violations of federal securities laws, focusing on misleading statements regarding the company's advertising revenue growth [1][2][3] Class Definition - The lawsuit seeks damages for all individuals and entities that purchased Snap securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, inclusive [2] Case Details - The Complaint alleges that Snap's advertising revenue growth declined significantly from 9% in Q1 2025 to just 1% in April 2025 due to execution failures [3] - Defendants are accused of misrepresenting Snap's advertising performance by issuing overly positive statements while concealing negative facts [3] - As a result, statements made by the Defendants regarding Snap's business and prospects were materially false and misleading [3] Next Steps - Interested investors have until October 20, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the case [4] - A copy of the Complaint can be reviewed on the law firm's website [4] Legal Representation - The law firm operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only seek reimbursement for expenses and fees if successful [5] - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC has a history of recovering significant amounts for investors in securities fraud cases [6]

TikTok isn’t making a comeback in India. https://t.co/8Kpg4FXVW8 ...

Core Insights - Pinterest (PINS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) are significant players in the social media and social commerce sectors, with Pinterest focusing on visual recommendations and Meta leveraging its extensive user base across multiple platforms [1][2][3] Group 1: Market Position and Growth - The global social commerce market is projected to reach $17.83 trillion by 2033, with a CAGR of 36.4% from 2025 to 2033, prompting Pinterest and META to enhance their market strategies [3] - Pinterest reported a record high of 578 million global monthly active users (MAUs) in Q2 2025, indicating consistent user growth across all regions [5] - META's Family Daily Active People (DAP) reached 3.48 billion in Q2 2025, reflecting a 6.4% year-over-year increase, showcasing its vast user engagement potential [9] Group 2: Financial Performance - Pinterest's total costs and expenses rose to $1 billion in Q2 2025, up from $875.1 million year-over-year, indicating increased operational costs [7] - META's cash and cash equivalents stood at $47.07 billion as of June 30, 2025, with a current ratio of 1.97, suggesting strong liquidity [12] Group 3: Competitive Landscape - Pinterest faces intense competition from META, SNAP Inc., and others in the social commerce space, necessitating aggressive market expansion and innovation [7] - META is enhancing user engagement through AI-powered recommendations, resulting in a 5% increase in time spent on Facebook and a 6% increase on Instagram in Q2 2025 [11] Group 4: Valuation and Estimates - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Pinterest's 2025 sales implies a year-over-year growth of 15.62%, while META's sales growth estimate is 19.1% [14][16] - Over the past year, Pinterest's stock gained 10.5%, while META surged 41.3%, indicating stronger market performance for META [17] Group 5: Strategic Initiatives - Pinterest is focusing on improving its advertising platform to attract consumer discretionary brands, while META is investing in AI capabilities to enhance engagement and advertising effectiveness [4][11] - Both companies are ranked 3 (Hold) by Zacks, with upward estimate revisions for META indicating growing investor confidence [19]

The move comes as other social-media companies have started to scale back teams dedicated to policing online content https://t.co/HyE9L7fny0 ...

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap Inc. for allegedly providing misleading information regarding its advertising revenue expectations during the second quarter and full year fiscal 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Financial Impact - The lawsuit claims that Snap's management made overly positive statements about the company's advertising growth potential while concealing significant declines in advertising revenue growth, which fell from 9% in Q1 to only 1% in April 2025 [3]. - On August 5, 2025, Snap reported a slowdown in advertising revenue growth, attributing it to issues with its ad platform and other external factors, leading to a significant stock price drop from $9.39 to $7.78 per share, a decline of approximately 17.15% in one day [4]. Group 2: Investor Actions - Investors who acquired Snap shares during the class period are encouraged to contact the law firm Gainey McKenna & Egleston before the lead plaintiff motion deadline on October 20, 2025, to discuss their rights and interests regarding the class action [5].

Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: META ) has lived up to its name as part of the Magnificent Seven. The company has appreciated by around 38% this year, driven by growth and capital expenditure investments. Given its sizeDear Reader,I am Senior Derivatives Expert with over 10 years of experience in the field of Asset Management, specializing in equity analysis and research, macroeconomics and risk-managed portfolio construction. My professional background covers both institutional and private client asset manag ...

Core Viewpoint - A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap Inc. alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its advertising revenue growth rate [1]. Group 1 - The lawsuit claims that Snap failed to disclose material adverse information about its advertising revenue growth [1]. - The class action pertains to shareholders who purchased Snap shares between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, and experienced significant losses [2]. - The deadline for shareholders to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the case is October 20, 2025 [3]. Group 2 - Holzer & Holzer, LLC is the law firm representing the shareholders, known for its strong track record in securities litigation [3]. - The firm has been recognized as an ISS top-rated securities litigation law firm for the years 2021, 2022, and 2023 [3]. - Holzer & Holzer has a history of recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders affected by corporate misconduct since its founding in 2000 [3].