调查称，社交媒体已超过其他媒介形式，成为美国18至29岁年轻人获取新闻的首选渠道。76%的受访者 表示他们经常或有时通过社交媒体获取新闻。相比之下，新闻网站为60%，邮件简报为28%。 凤凰网科技讯 北京时间12月30日，据《商业内幕》报道，皮尤研究中心的最新调查数据显示，TikTok 已成为美国18岁至29岁年轻人获取新闻的头号社交应用，超过了2024年的首选应用YouTube和 Instagram。 皮尤的数据显示，2025年，43%的年轻成年人表示他们经常从TikTok获取新闻。相比之下，YouTube和 脸书各为41%，Instagram为40%，X为21%，Reddit为18%。 TikTok作为新闻获取渠道的地位正在快速攀升。2023年，仅32%的受访者将该视频应用列为日常新闻消 费平台。(作者/箫雨) 在受访的年轻成年人中，约半数表示对作为新闻来源的社交媒体有一定或较高的信任度。这一信任度水 平大致与他们对美国全国性新闻机构信息的信任度相当。 ...

Michael Vi/iStock Editorial via Getty Images Listen below or on the go via Apple Podcasts and Spotify Coupang (CPNG) promises over $1 billion compensation for data leak victims. (00:24) China's private rocket company LandSpace prepares to stand against Elon Musk's SpaceX - report. (01:16) New York to require mental health warning labels on social media platforms. (02:21) This is an abridged transcript. South Korea's largest e-commerce platform, Coupang (CPNG) announced compensation exceeding $1 billion ...

Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is one of the AI Stocks Investors Are Watching. On December 22, Needham reiterated the stock as “Buy” with a $300 price target. The firm said that the stock is firing on all cylinders and is a best idea in 2026. “We add RDDT to the Conviction List, replacing Roku, which is up 48% YTD in 2025.” According to the firm, Reddit’s advantage of having 100% human-created content optimizes trust, authenticity, and value to LLMs. The company is already generating over $100M per year in fe ...

Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is leaning into its massive trove of human conversations as demand surges for high-quality AI training data.The platform is also pushing new product features and ad tools as it works to deepen engagement and expand monetization.Needham analyst Laura Martin reiterated the Buy rating on the stock, with a price forecast of $300.Also Read: Reddit Files Lawsuit Against Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Citing Free Speech ViolationMartin said Reddit’s largest upside comes from licensi ...

Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is leaning into its massive trove of human conversations as demand surges for high-quality AI training data.The platform is also pushing new product features and ad tools as it works to deepen engagement and expand monetization.Needham analyst Laura Martin reiterated the Buy rating on the stock, with a price forecast of $300.Also Read: Reddit Files Lawsuit Against Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Citing Free Speech ViolationMartin said Reddit’s largest upside comes from licensi ...

Core Argument - A new Australian law prohibits children under 16 from opening or maintaining social media accounts, prompting Reddit to argue that it is not a social media platform and seeks to overturn the law [1][2]. Company Position - Reddit filed a lawsuit against the Australian government, claiming the law infringes on the implied freedom of political communication and contests its classification as an "age-restricted social media platform" [2][3]. - The company asserts that it operates as a collection of public forums rather than a platform for social interaction, emphasizing that users often remain anonymous and do not know each other's real identities [3][4]. Features and Functionality - Reddit does not import contact lists or address books, and its upvote/downvote system is designed to evaluate information rather than the users themselves, distinguishing it from traditional social media platforms [4]. - Founded in 2005, Reddit allows users to post and reply on various topics through "subreddits," with the option for users to communicate via direct messages while primarily maintaining anonymity [4]. Financial Context - Reddit went public in 2024 with a valuation of $6.4 billion, indicating its significant market presence [5]. Industry Response - The new law has faced criticism from other companies, including TikTok's parent company ByteDance and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, highlighting broader industry concerns regarding age verification processes [6]. - Reddit expressed that the law could lead to intrusive verification processes affecting both adults and minors, potentially isolating teens from engaging in community experiences, including political discussions [7]. Global Trends - Other countries are also considering similar restrictions on social media use among young people, with Malaysia planning to implement a ban for children under 16 in 2026, and proposals in Norway and Denmark for children under 15 [8]. - In the U.S., the Kids Off Social Media Act has been introduced to prevent children under 13 from creating accounts and restrict algorithmic targeting for those under 17 [9].

Core Viewpoint - Reddit has initiated legal action against Australia's new Social Media Minimum Age (SMMA) law, claiming it infringes on free political discourse and communication rights [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal Challenge - Reddit's lawsuit is a response to the SMMA law, which bans social media access for individuals under 16, marking the first such law globally [2]. - The company argues that it should be exempt from the ban as it does not fit the traditional definition of social media [3]. - This legal challenge follows a similar case by two Australian teenagers, indicating a significant escalation in the legal battle against the ban [5]. Group 2: Implications of the Ban - Reddit acknowledges the importance of protecting users under 16 but criticizes the law for leading to intrusive verification processes and limiting teens' participation in age-appropriate communities, including political discussions [4]. - The SMMA law raises concerns regarding privacy and free expression for all internet users, suggesting that there are more effective ways to safeguard youth [4]. Group 3: Industry Response - Other major platforms, such as Elon Musk's X and Meta Platforms, have complied with the new law, indicating a broader trend of regulation within the tech industry [7]. - The Australian government, represented by Communications Minister Anika Wells, has stated that it will not be influenced by Big Tech companies in enforcing the ban [5][6]. Group 4: Market Performance - Reddit's stock has seen a year-to-date increase of 40.76%, although it experienced a decline of 1.92% to close at $233.54 recently [8].

Core Viewpoint - Reddit has initiated a legal challenge against Australia's social media ban for teens under 16, claiming the law is ineffective and overly restrictive on political discussions online [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Challenge - Reddit's application to Australia's High Court argues that the law is "invalid on the basis of the implied freedom of political communication" and burdens political communication [1][3]. - The platform seeks either to declare the law invalid or to exclude itself from its provisions [3]. Group 2: Law Details - The law requires targeted platforms to take "reasonable steps" to prevent underage access, utilizing age-verification methods such as online activity inference, facial estimation via selfies, uploaded IDs, or linked bank details [2][3]. - The ban affects 10 major services, including YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, and Reddit [2]. Group 3: Reddit's Position - Reddit emphasizes that while it supports protecting individuals under 16, the law could isolate teens from engaging in age-appropriate community experiences, including political discussions [4]. - The platform argues that its nature as a forum for adults facilitates knowledge sharing rather than functioning as a traditional social network [4][5]. - Reddit states that most content is accessible without an account, and having an account could provide better protection for users under 16 through customizable settings [5]. Group 4: Compliance and Alternatives - Despite its objections, Reddit clarifies that the challenge is not an attempt to evade compliance with the law or retain young users for business reasons [6]. - The platform advocates for more targeted, privacy-preserving measures to protect young people online instead of blanket bans [6].

Core Viewpoint - Australia has become the first country to implement a ban on social media usage for children under 16, marking a significant shift in the definition of childhood in the digital age [2][23]. Regulatory Framework - The law mandates that ten social media platforms, including Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, must take "reasonable measures" to prevent children under 16 from using their services, with penalties of up to AUD 49.5 million (approximately USD 32 million) for non-compliance [3][24]. - Major platforms like YouTube and Meta have begun to automatically deactivate accounts of users under 16, while TikTok will suspend all such accounts as of December 10 [3][24]. Social Implications - The ban has sparked discussions about the balance between freedom and protection, with some experts believing that children will ultimately benefit from this decision, while others express concerns about potential legal challenges regarding freedom of speech [4][25]. - There is speculation that children may migrate to emerging platforms like Yope, circumventing the ban on the ten major platforms [5][26]. Global Perspective - Other countries, including Denmark, Ireland, Malaysia, and New Zealand, are considering similar bans, indicating a potential trend in global digital governance [6][27]. - The rapid legislative process in Australia has raised concerns about the adequacy of public consultation and the potential for unintended consequences, with many experts opposing the law due to a lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness [8][29]. Observational Study - The Australian government plans to monitor the effects of the ban, focusing on various metrics such as children's sleep patterns, social interactions, and mental health outcomes [11][33]. - The potential for children to engage with less regulated online spaces raises questions about the overall impact of the ban on their digital literacy and future competitiveness in an AI-driven world [13][34]. Alternative Approaches - The situation in Australia has prompted discussions about the feasibility of similar measures in the United States, where such policies may face constitutional challenges [15][36]. - The article highlights China's advanced governance model for protecting minors online, which has been recognized for balancing safety and access to beneficial content [16][37].

Core Viewpoint - Australia has become the first country to formally prohibit users under the age of 16 from accessing major social media platforms, a move that is expected to influence global tech companies and policymakers [1][3]. Group 1: Policy Implementation - The ban, effective from midnight local time, targets 10 major platforms including YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, Snapchat, and X, requiring them to implement age-verification methods [2][3]. - All targeted platforms have agreed to comply with the policy, with X being one of the last to signal compliance [3]. Group 2: Public Support and Opposition - A YouGov survey indicated that 77% of Australians supported the under-16 social media ban, with proponents arguing it protects children from social media-related harms [4]. - Critics argue that the ban infringes on freedom of expression, raises privacy concerns, and undermines parental responsibility, with groups like Amnesty Tech labeling it an ineffective solution [9][10]. Group 3: Enforcement Challenges - Tech companies, including Google, have expressed concerns about the difficulty of enforcing the policy, citing inaccuracies in age-verification technology [13]. - Reports suggest that many children have already found ways to bypass the ban, indicating potential enforcement challenges [13][15]. Group 4: Global Implications - The Australian policy is expected to set a precedent for other countries considering similar bans, with nations like Denmark, Norway, France, Spain, Malaysia, and New Zealand monitoring the situation [3][16]. - The European Parliament has also proposed a minimum age of 16 for social media access, reflecting a growing trend in regulatory scrutiny of social media platforms [17][19].