金融期权 2025/05/08 金融期权策略早报 | 卢品先 | 投研经理 | 从业资格号：F3047321 | 交易咨询号：Z0015541 | 邮箱：lupx@wkqh.cn | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 黄柯涵 | 期权研究员 | 从业资格号：F03138607 | 电话：0755-23375252 | 邮箱：huangkh@wkqh.cn | 金融期权策略早报概要： （1）股市短评：金融期权整体小幅波动上涨。 （2）金融期权波动性分析：金融期权隐含波动率历史均值偏下水平波动。 （3）金融期权策略与建议：对于ETF期权来说，适合构建备兑策略和偏中性的双卖策略，垂直价差组合策略；对于 股指期权来说，适合构建偏中性的双卖策略和期权合成期货多头或空头与期货空头或多头做套利策略。 表1：金融市场重要指数概况 | 重要指数 | 指数代码 | 收盘价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 | 成交额 | 额变化 | PE | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | （%） | (亿元) | （亿元） | | | ...

Market Performance - On May 6, the A-share market opened high and closed higher, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 1.13%, the ChiNext Index increasing by 1.97%, and the STAR Market Index up by 1.39% [1] - The total trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets reached 1.36 trillion yuan, showing a slight increase compared to the previous trading day [1] - More than 5,000 stocks rose, indicating a generally positive market sentiment, while only the banking sector experienced a slight decline [1] Options Market Activity - The options market saw a significant increase in trading volume, with total transactions reaching 4.9417 million contracts, up 49.08% from the previous day [1] - Total open interest rose to 7.9678 million contracts, an increase of 13.47% [1] - The trading volume of the SSE 50 ETF options increased by 25.51%, with open interest rising by 14.12% [2] Specific Options Insights - For the SSE 50 ETF options, the trading volume was 829,500 contracts, up from 660,900 contracts, with open interest at 1.3745 million contracts, an increase from 1.2044 million contracts [2] - The May contracts showed a total increase of 101,500 contracts, with call options increasing by 45,900 contracts and put options by 55,600 contracts, indicating a broader range of positions in the shallow out-of-the-money area [2] - The CSI 300 options also saw a near 80% increase in trading volume, with significant increases in both trading and open interest across different exchanges [2] Volatility and Market Outlook - The implied volatility for options decreased, with the SSE 50 ETF at 12.24% [2] - Historical volatility remained stable, with the 30-day historical volatility for the SSE 50 ETF at 19.58% and for the CSI 300 Index at 21.97% [2] - The overall market is expected to maintain a strong short-term trend, with recommendations for volatility strategy exits and small positions in bullish spread combinations [3]

金融期权 2025/05/07 金融期权策略早报 | 卢品先 | 投研经理 | 从业资格号：F3047321 | 交易咨询号：Z0015541 | 邮箱：lupx@wkqh.cn | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 黄柯涵 | 期权研究员 | 从业资格号：F03138607 | 电话：0755-23375252 | 邮箱：huangkh@wkqh.cn | 金融期权策略早报概要： （1）股市短评：金融期权整体上涨，中证1000、创业板上涨福度较大，中证1000上涨2.57%，创业板上涨1.93%。 （2）金融期权波动性分析：金融期权隐含波动率历史均值偏下水平波动。 （3）金融期权策略与建议：对于ETF期权来说，适合构建备兑策略和偏中性的双卖策略，垂直价差组合策略；对于 股指期权来说，适合构建偏中性的双卖策略和期权合成期货多头或空头与期货空头或多头做套利策略。 表1：金融市场重要指数概况 | 重要指数 | 指数代码 | 收盘价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 | 成交额 | 额变化 | PE | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | - ...

金融期权 2025-05-06 金融期权策略早报 | 卢品先 | 投研经理 | 从业资格号：F3047321 | 交易咨询号：Z0015541 | 邮箱：lupx@wkqh.cn | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 黄柯涵 | 期权研究员 | 从业资格号：F03138607 | 电话：0755-23375252 | 邮箱：huangkh@wkqh.cn | 金融期权策略早报概要： （1）股市短评：上证综指数偏上窄幅盘整，大盘蓝筹股偏强震荡，而中小盘股和创业板股偏弱盘整。 （2）金融期权波动性分析：金融期权隐含波动率历史均值偏下水平波动。 （3）金融期权策略与建议：对于ETF期权来说，适合构建备兑策略和偏中性的双卖策略，垂直价差组合策略；对于 股指期权来说，适合构建偏中性的双卖策略和期权合成期货多头或空头与期货空头或多头做套利策略。 表1：金融市场重要指数概况 | 重要指数 | 指数代码 | 收盘价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 | 成交额 | 额变化 | PE | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | ...

金融期权 2025/04/30 金融期权策略早报 | 卢品先 | 投研经理 | 从业资格号：F3047321 | 交易咨询号：Z0015541 | 邮箱：lupx@wkqh.cn | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 黄柯涵 | 期权研究员 | 从业资格号：F03138607 | 电话：0755-23375252 | 邮箱：huangkh@wkqh.cn | 金融期权策略早报概要： （1）股市短评：上证综指数偏上窄幅盘整，大盘蓝筹股偏强震荡，而中小盘股和创业板股偏弱盘整。 （2）金融期权波动性分析：金融期权隐含波动率历史均值偏下水平波动。 （3）金融期权策略与建议：对于ETF期权来说，适合构建备兑策略和偏中性的双卖策略，垂直价差组合策略；对于 股指期权来说，适合构建偏中性的双卖策略和期权合成期货多头或空头与期货空头或多头做套利策略。 表1：金融市场重要指数概况 | 重要指数 | 指数代码 | 收盘价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 | 成交额 | 额变化 | PE | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | ...

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints of the Report - Today, all stock indices fluctuated and consolidated. The stock market trading volume was 1138.9 billion yuan, a decrease of 123.5 billion yuan from the previous day. The current trading volume of the stock market is around 1 trillion yuan, indicating relatively stable market sentiment, but investors' willingness to chase higher is not strong [3]. - Recently, the marginal decline of overseas tariff uncertainty risk has boosted market sentiment, but Trump's statements may still fluctuate, so one should not be overly optimistic about overseas factors. Domestically, when the policy will be introduced depends on the performance of macro - economic indicators. The expectation of policy intensification can provide strong bottom support for the stock index, but the short - term upward momentum has also weakened [3]. - As the stock index rebounds to the gap position in early April, market investors will tend to wait and see, waiting for the settlement of external uncertainties and clear signals of domestic policy introduction. In general, with both long and short factors present, the stock index is expected to fluctuate within a range in the short term. In the options market, bull spreads or ratio spreads can be arranged [3]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1 Option Indicators - On April 24, 2025, the 50ETF rose 0.26% to close at 2.715; the 300ETF (SSE) remained unchanged at 3.882; the 300ETF (SZSE) fell 0.13% to close at 3.912; the CSI 300 Index fell 0.07% to close at 3784.36; the CSI 1000 Index fell 1.07% to close at 5920.48; the 500ETF (SSE) fell 0.41% to close at 5.605; the 500ETF (SZSE) fell 0.31% to close at 2.241; the ChiNext ETF fell 0.63% to close at 1.907; the Shenzhen 100ETF fell 0.35% to close at 2.596; the SSE 50 Index rose 0.25% to close at 2655.36; the Science and Technology Innovation 50ETF fell 1.03% to close at 1.05; the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50ETF fell 0.97% to close at 1.03 [5]. - The PCR values of various options' trading volume and open interest changed compared with the previous trading day. For example, the trading volume PCR of the 50ETF option was 101.56 (previous day: 82.27), and the open - interest PCR was 96.09 (previous day: 90.40) [6]. - The implied volatility of the May 2025 at - the - money options and the 30 - trading - day historical volatility of the underlying assets of various options were provided. For example, the implied volatility of the May 2025 at - the - money option of the 50ETF option was 13.44%, and the 30 - trading - day historical volatility of the underlying asset was 21.40% [7]. 2 Relevant Charts - **SSE 50ETF Option**: Included charts such as the SSE 50ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [9][10][11]. - **SSE 300ETF Option**: Included charts such as the SSE 300ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [20][21]. - **SZSE 300ETF Option**: Included charts such as the SZSE 300ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [23][24]. - **CSI 300 Index Option**: Included charts such as the CSI 300 index trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [26][27]. - **CSI 1000 Index Option**: Included charts such as the CSI 1000 index trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [38][39]. - **SSE 500ETF Option**: Included charts such as the SSE 500ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [51][52]. - **SZSE 500ETF Option**: Included charts such as the SZSE 500ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [63][64]. - **ChiNext ETF Option**: Included charts such as the ChiNext ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [76][77]. - **Shenzhen 100ETF Option**: Included charts such as the Shenzhen 100ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [87][88]. - **SSE 50 Index Option**: Included charts such as the SSE 50 index trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [100][101]. - **Science and Technology Innovation 50ETF Option**: Included charts such as the Science and Technology Innovation 50ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [112][113]. - **E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50ETF Option**: Included charts such as the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50ETF trend, option volatility, trading volume PCR, open - interest PCR, implied volatility curve, and implied volatility of at - the - money options for different terms [117][118].

4月22日，A股继续窄幅震荡。截至收盘，上证指数涨0.37%，创业板指数跌0.69%，科创板指数跌0.03%。沪深两 市累计成交1.12万亿元，基本与上一交易日持平。板块方面，物流、贸易、农业、港口航运等板块收涨，金属新材 料、厨卫电器、通信、酒店旅游等板块收跌。期权标的走势分化，全市场成交量较前一交易日有所下滑，而持仓量稳 步回升。当日，沪深两市及中金所期权总成交489.76万张，较前一交易日减少16.40%；总持仓967.53万张，较前一交 易日增加5.73%。 上证50ETF期权成交和持仓变化方向并不一致。具体来看，成交78.89万张，较前一交易日减少16.65万张；持仓 160.86万张，较前一交易日增加4.86万张。从5月合约各执行价的持仓变动情况来看，合计增持7.41万张。其中，认购 增持3.15万张，认沽增持4.26万张。认购、认沽增持价位均较为宽泛，但都在浅虚值部位集中增持，且认沽增持力度 更大，预计市场延续震荡格局。 与上证50ETF期权表现类似，沪深300期权也是成交量下滑、持仓量回升。深交所沪深300ETF期权成交量减少 12.30%，上交所沪深300ETF期权成交量减少20.57%，中 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The overall financial options showed small fluctuations, and the implied volatility of financial options fluctuated around the historical average level [3]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct covered strategies, neutral double - selling strategies, and vertical spread combination strategies; for index options, it is suitable to construct neutral double - selling strategies and arbitrage strategies between synthetic long or short options and short or long futures [3]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Financial Market Important Index Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,280.34, up 4.34 points or 0.13%, with a trading volume of 442.6 billion yuan, a decrease of 46.6 billion yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen Component Index closed at 9,759.05, down 15.68 points or 0.16%, with a trading volume of 556.9 billion yuan, a decrease of 65.8 billion yuan [4]. - The SSE 50 Index closed at 2,659.90, up 1.40 points or 0.05%, with a trading volume of 71.4 billion yuan, a decrease of 17.9 billion yuan [4]. - The CSI 300 Index closed at 3,772.22, down 0.60 points or 0.02%, with a trading volume of 209 billion yuan, a decrease of 52.7 billion yuan [4]. - The CSI 500 Index closed at 5,557.01, up 0.15 points or 0.00%, with a trading volume of 148.3 billion yuan, a decrease of 15.5 billion yuan [4]. - The CSI 1000 Index closed at 5,839.56, up 4.22 points or 0.07%, with a trading volume of 212.9 billion yuan, a decrease of 16.5 billion yuan [4]. 3.2 Option - underlying ETF Market Overview - The closing prices of various ETFs showed different changes, and the trading volumes and turnovers also had corresponding fluctuations. For example, the SSE 50 ETF closed at 2.718, up 0.003 or 0.11%, with a trading volume of 11.6633 million shares and a turnover of 3.166 billion yuan, a decrease of 3.089 billion yuan [5]. 3.3 Option Factor - Volume and Position PCR - The volume and position PCR of different option varieties showed different trends. For example, the volume PCR of the SSE 50 ETF option was 0.81, a decrease of 0.19, and the position PCR was 0.78, an increase of 0.01 [6]. 3.4 Option Factor - Pressure and Support Points - From the perspective of the strike prices with the largest open interest of call and put options, the pressure and support points of different option - underlying assets were obtained. For example, the pressure point of the SSE 50 ETF was 2.75, and the support point was 2.65 [8]. 3.5 Option Factor - Implied Volatility - The implied volatility of different option varieties showed different levels and changes. For example, the at - the - money implied volatility of the SSE 50 ETF option was 14.89%, and the weighted implied volatility was 16.50%, a decrease of 0.20% [10]. 3.6 Strategy and Suggestions - The financial options sector is divided into large - cap blue - chip stocks, small and medium - sized boards, and the growth enterprise board. Different sectors have different option strategies and suggestions [12]. - For each option variety, option strategy reports are prepared according to the analysis of the underlying asset market, option factor research, and option strategy suggestions [12]. - **Financial Stocks Sector (SSE 50 ETF, SSE 50)**: The SSE 50 ETF showed a mild upward trend with support below. The implied volatility fluctuated around the average, and the position PCR indicated a weakening of short - selling sentiment. Strategies included constructing a short - volatility strategy and a covered call strategy [13]. - **Large - cap Blue - chip Stocks Sector (SSE 300 ETF, SZSE 300 ETF, CSI 300)**: The SSE 300 ETF showed a range - bound trend with pressure above and support below. The implied volatility fluctuated around the average, and the position PCR indicated a release of short - selling pressure. Strategies included constructing a short - volatility strategy and a covered call strategy [14]. - **Large - and Medium - sized Stocks Sector (SZSE 100 ETF)**: The SZSE 100 ETF showed a weak range - bound trend with pressure above. The implied volatility fluctuated below the historical average, and the position PCR indicated a weakening of short - selling and an increase in long - buying. Strategies included constructing a short - volatility strategy and a covered call strategy [15]. - **Small and Medium - sized Boards Sector (SSE 500 ETF, SZSE 500 ETF, CSI 1000)**: The SSE 500 ETF showed a weak range - bound trend under short - selling pressure. The implied volatility fluctuated around the historical average, and the position PCR indicated a weakening of short - selling pressure. Strategies included constructing a short - volatility strategy and a covered call strategy [15]. - **Growth Enterprise Board Sector (Growth Enterprise Market ETF, Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF, E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF)**: The Growth Enterprise Market ETF showed a weak range - bound trend with pressure above. The implied volatility remained at a relatively high historical level, and the position PCR indicated strong short - selling pressure. Strategies included constructing a bear - spread combination strategy, a short - volatility strategy, and a covered call strategy [16].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The Shanghai Composite Index, Shenzhen Component Index, SSE 50 ETF, CSI 300, and ChiNext all rose slightly [2]. - The implied volatility of financial options decreased slightly [2]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct covered strategies, neutral double - selling strategies, and vertical spread combination strategies; for stock index options, it is suitable to construct neutral double - selling strategies and arbitrage strategies between synthetic long or short options and long or short futures [2]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs Stock Market Review - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,223.64, up 36.83 points or 1.16%, with a trading volume of 682.4 billion yuan, a decrease of 73.1 billion yuan [3]. - The Shenzhen Component Index closed at 9,754.64, up 214.75 points or 2.25%, with a trading volume of 927.1 billion yuan, a decrease of 17.1 billion yuan [3]. - The SSE 50 closed at 2,612.62, up 15.52 points or 0.60%, with a trading volume of 114.8 billion yuan, a decrease of 28.9 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 300 closed at 3,735.12, up 48.32 points or 1.31%, with a trading volume of 403.8 billion yuan, a decrease of 51.2 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 500 closed at 5,544.06, up 104.29 points or 1.92%, with a trading volume of 268.7 billion yuan, a decrease of 19.6 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 1000 closed at 5,784.59, up 132.26 points or 2.34%, with a trading volume of 330 billion yuan, a decrease of 12.1 billion yuan [3]. ETF Market Overview - The SSE 50 ETF closed at 2.672, up 0.024 or 0.91%, with a trading volume of 8.7692 million shares, an increase of 8.6189 million shares, and a trading volume of 2.336 billion yuan, a decrease of 1.614 billion yuan [4]. - The SSE 300 ETF closed at 3.829, up 0.063 or 1.67%, with a trading volume of 14.2963 million shares, an increase of 14.1265 million shares, and a trading volume of 5.465 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.869 billion yuan [4]. - The SSE 500 ETF closed at 5.535, up 0.107 or 1.97%, with a trading volume of 2.6698 million shares, an increase of 2.6344 million shares, and a trading volume of 1.484 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.401 billion yuan [4]. Option Factor - Volume and Position PCR - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.3469 million contracts, a decrease of 205,400 contracts; the open interest was 1.5777 million contracts, a decrease of 108,800 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.79, a decrease of 0.07; the position PCR was 0.64, unchanged [5]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.3834 million contracts, a decrease of 21,000 contracts; the open interest was 1.3836 million contracts, a decrease of 153,300 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.83, a decrease of 0.01; the position PCR was 0.71, an increase of 0.01 [5]. Option Factor - Pressure and Support Points - The pressure point of the SSE 50 ETF was 2.75, and the support point was 2.65 [7]. - The pressure point of the SSE 300 ETF was 4.00, and the support point was 3.70 [7]. Option Factor - Implied Volatility - The at - the - money implied volatility of the SSE 50 ETF option was 18.80%, the weighted implied volatility was 20.85%, a decrease of 3.70%, the annual average was 17.87%, the call implied volatility was 20.73%, the put implied volatility was 20.99%, the 20 - day historical volatility was 12.25%, and the implied - historical volatility difference was 8.60% [9]. - The at - the - money implied volatility of the SSE 300 ETF option was 19.64%, the weighted implied volatility was 22.40%, a decrease of 4.14%, the annual average was 18.52%, the call implied volatility was 22.27%, the put implied volatility was 22.56%, the 20 - day historical volatility was 11.86%, and the implied - historical volatility difference was 10.55% [9]. Strategies and Recommendations Financial Stocks Sector (SSE 50 ETF, SSE 50) - Directional strategy: Construct a bear spread combination strategy of put options, such as BUY_510050P2504M02650 and SELL_510050P2504M02550 [12]. - Volatility strategy: Construct a short - volatility strategy, such as SELL_510050P2504M02500 and SELL_510050P2504M02700 [12]. - Covered call strategy: Hold the SSE 50 ETF and sell call options, such as LONG_510050 + SELL_510050C2504M02700 [12]. Large - Cap Blue - Chip Stocks Sector (SSE 300 ETF, SZSE 300 ETF, CSI 300) - Directional strategy: Construct a bear spread combination strategy of put options, such as BUY_510300P2504M03700 and SELL_510300P2504M03500 [12]. - Volatility strategy: Construct a short - volatility strategy of selling call and put options, such as S_510300P2504M03400 and S_510300C2504M03800 [12]. - Covered call strategy: Hold the SSE 300 ETF and sell call options, such as LONG_510300 + SELL_510300C2504M03700 [12].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The Shanghai Composite Index, Shenzhen Component Index, and SME and ChiNext indices all showed slight fluctuations [3]. - The implied volatility of financial options fluctuated below the historical average [3]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct covered strategies, neutral double - selling strategies, and vertical spread combination strategies; for stock index options, it is suitable to construct neutral double - selling strategies and arbitrage strategies between synthetic long or short options and long or short futures [3]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Financial Market Important Index Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,350.13, up 1.69 points or 0.05%, with a trading volume of 411.7 billion yuan, a decrease of 87.7 billion yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen Component Index closed at 10,513.12, up 9.46 points or 0.09%, with a trading volume of 562.8 billion yuan, a decrease of 70 billion yuan [4]. - The Shanghai 50 Index closed at 2,658.62, down 4.09 points or - 0.15%, with a trading volume of 54.1 billion yuan, a decrease of 16.5 billion yuan [4]. - The CSI 300 Index closed at 3,884.39, down 3.30 points or - 0.08%, with a trading volume of 198.3 billion yuan, a decrease of 47.8 billion yuan [4]. - The CSI 500 Index closed at 5,899.09, up 6.24 points or 0.11%, with a trading volume of 140.6 billion yuan, a decrease of 38.7 billion yuan [4]. - The CSI 1000 Index closed at 6,277.25, up 17.77 points or 0.28%, with a trading volume of 208.4 billion yuan, a decrease of 33.3 billion yuan [4]. 3.2 Option - underlying ETF Market Overview - The Shanghai 50 ETF closed at 2.716, down 0.005 or - 0.18%, with a trading volume of 3.7596 million shares, an increase of 3.7139 million shares, and a trading value of 1.023 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.223 billion yuan [5]. - The Shanghai 300 ETF closed at 3.979, down 0.003 or - 0.08%, with a trading volume of 6.2912 million shares, an increase of 6.2297 million shares, and a trading value of 2.506 billion yuan, an increase of 0.053 billion yuan [5]. - The Shanghai 500 ETF closed at 5.893, up 0.007 or 0.12%, with a trading volume of 1.7842 million shares, an increase of 1.7668 million shares, and a trading value of 1.054 billion yuan, an increase of 0.027 billion yuan [5]. - The Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.074, down 0.002 or - 0.19%, with a trading volume of 18.6744 million shares, an increase of 18.4132 million shares, and a trading value of 2.008 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.813 billion yuan [5]. - The E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.046, down 0.003 or - 0.29%, with a trading volume of 3.8927 million shares, an increase of 3.8484 million shares, and a trading value of 0.408 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.058 billion yuan [5]. - The Shenzhen 300 ETF closed at 4.015, down 0.004 or - 0.10%, with a trading volume of 1.0763 million shares, an increase of 1.0698 million shares, and a trading value of 0.433 billion yuan, an increase of 0.171 billion yuan [5]. - The Shenzhen 500 ETF closed at 2.353, up 0.002 or 0.09%, with a trading volume of 0.6242 million shares, an increase of 0.6087 million shares, and a trading value of 0.147 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.216 billion yuan [5]. - The Shenzhen 100 ETF closed at 2.744, down 0.001 or - 0.04%, with a trading volume of 0.1819 million shares, an increase of 0.1788 million shares, and a trading value of 0.05 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.036 billion yuan [5]. - The ChiNext ETF closed at 2.064, up 0.002 or 0.10%, with a trading volume of 7.3032 million shares, an increase of 7.2101 million shares, and a trading value of 1.51 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.417 billion yuan [5]. 3.3 Option Factor - Volume and Position PCR - For the Shanghai 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 557,600 contracts, a decrease of 50,400 contracts; the open interest was 1,317,700 contracts, an increase of 41,400 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.91, an increase of 0.04; the open interest PCR was 0.70, a decrease of 0.01 [6]. - For the Shanghai 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 531,700 contracts, a decrease of 65,400 contracts; the open interest was 1,201,300 contracts, an increase of 27,300 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.93, an increase of 0.01; the open interest PCR was 0.76, unchanged [6]. - For the Shanghai 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 817,000 contracts, a decrease of 141,700 contracts; the open interest was 945,200 contracts, an increase of 16,100 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.00, an increase of 0.05; the open interest PCR was 0.94, an increase of 0.03 [6]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 428,600 contracts, a decrease of 143,600 contracts; the open interest was 1,644,800 contracts, an increase of 53,400 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.85, an increase of 0.12; the open interest PCR was 0.65, a decrease of 0.02 [6]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 109,600 contracts, a decrease of 69,300 contracts; the open interest was 443,100 contracts, an increase of 7,900 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.87, an increase of 0.07; the open interest PCR was 0.62, a decrease of 0.01 [6]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 76,000 contracts, an increase of 76,000 contracts; the open interest was 240,700 contracts, an increase of 240,700 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.88, an increase of 0.88; the open interest PCR was 0.66, an increase of 0.66 [6]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 106,200 contracts, a decrease of 15,400 contracts; the open interest was 267,400 contracts, unchanged; the trading volume PCR was 0.78, a decrease of 0.09; the open interest PCR was 0.71, a decrease of 0.01 [6]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the trading volume was 36,500 contracts, a decrease of 100 contracts; the open interest was 85,400 contracts, an increase of 3,300 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.16, an increase of 0.24; the open interest PCR was 0.85, a decrease of 0.01 [6]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the trading volume was 628,600 contracts, a decrease of 199,100 contracts; the open interest was 1,174,600 contracts, an increase of 3,500 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.81, a decrease of 0.06; the open interest PCR was 0.70, unchanged [6]. - For the Shanghai 50 index option, the trading volume was 17,800 contracts, a decrease of 2,200 contracts; the open interest was 69,800 contracts, an increase of 1,200 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.60, a decrease of 0.14; the open interest PCR was 0.51, unchanged [6]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the trading volume was 44,100 contracts, a decrease of 6,300 contracts; the open interest was 198,800 contracts, an increase of 3,000 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.68, unchanged; the open interest PCR was 0.61, a decrease of 0.00 [6]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the trading volume was 148,800 contracts, a decrease of 16,000 contracts; the open interest was 227,000 contracts, an increase of 5,500 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.84, an increase of 0.05; the open interest PCR was 0.72, an increase of 0.01 [6]. 3.4 Option Factor - Pressure and Support Points - For the Shanghai 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.716, the at - the - money strike price was 2.70, the pressure point was 2.80, the support point was 2.70 [8]. - For the Shanghai 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 3.979, the at - the - money strike price was 4.00, the pressure point was 4.10, the support point was 3.90 [8]. - For the Shanghai 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 5.893, the at - the - money strike price was 6.00, the pressure point was 6.00, the support point was 5.50 [8]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.074, the at - the - money strike price was 1.05, the pressure point was 1.10, the support point was 1.05 [8]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.046, the at - the - money strike price was 1.05, the pressure point was 1.10, the support point was 1.00 [8]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 4.015, the at - the - money strike price was 4.00, the pressure point was 4.13, the support point was 3.94 [8]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.353, the at - the - money strike price was 2.35, the pressure point was 2.40, the support point was 2.30 [8]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.744, the at - the - money strike price was 2.75, the pressure point was 2.80, the support point was 2.75 [8]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.064, the at - the - money strike price was 2.05, the pressure point was 2.15, the support point was 2.00 [8]. - For the Shanghai 50 index option, the underlying closing price was 2,658.62, the at - the - money strike price was 2,650, the pressure point was 2,800, the support point was 2,650 [8]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the underlying closing price was 3,884.39, the at - the - money strike price was 3,900, the pressure point was 4,000, the support point was 3,950 [8]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the underlying closing price was 6,277.25, the at - the - money strike price was 6,300, the pressure point was 6,600, the support point was 6,000 [8]. 3.5 Option Factor - Implied Volatility - For the Shanghai 50 ETF option, the at - the - money implied volatility was 14.15%, the weighted implied volatility was 14.77%, an increase of 0.01%; the annual average was 18.71%; the call implied volatility was 14.85%; the put implied volatility was 14.67%; the HISV20 was 9.71%; the difference between implied and historical volatility was 5.06% [11]. - For the Shanghai 300 ETF option, the at - the - money implied volatility was 14.38%, the weighted implied volatility was 14.64%, an increase of 0.03%; the annual average was 19.11%; the call implied volatility was 14.79%; the put implied volatility was 14.46%; the HISV20 was 8.06%; the difference between implied and historical volatility was 6.58% [11]. - For the Shanghai 500 ETF option, the at - the - money implied volatility was 18.29%, the weighted implied volatility was 18.62%, a decrease of 0.26%; the annual average was 24.59%; the call implied volatility was 18.74%; the put implied volatility was 18.50%; the HISV20 was 11.63%; the difference between implied and historical volatility was 7.00% [11]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the at - the - money implied volatility was 24.45%, the weighted implied volatility was 27.45%, an increase of 0.70%; the annual average was 37.16%; the call implied volatility was 28.61%; the put implied volatility was 26.10%; the HISV20 was 11.34%; the difference between implied and historical volatility was 16.11% [11]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the at - the - money implied volatility was 25.64%, the weighted implied volatility was 27.89%, an increase of 0.57%; the annual average was 36.96%; the call implied volatility was 28.93%; the put implied volatility was 26.29%; the HISV20 was 25.28%; the difference between implied and historical volatility was 2.62% [11]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the at - the - money implied volatility was 14.29%, the weighted implied volatility was 15.24%, a decrease of 0.23%; the annual average was 20.20%; the call implied volatility was 15.74%; the put implied volatility was 14.68%; the HISV20 was 11.78%; the difference between implied and historical volatility was 3.46% [11]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the at - the - money implied volatility was 18.25%, the weighted implied volatility was