来源：期权时代 01 今年6月，中国证监会发布公告称，将从2025年10月9日起允许合格境外投资者参与场内ETF期权交易，交易目的限于套期保值。 9月30日晚间，上交所通知，即日起开始受理合格境外投资者参与股票期权交易的业务办理申请，深交所也通知称，自10月9日起开始受理合格境外投资者 参与股票期权交易的业务办理申请。中国结算也同日发布通知各结算参与人做好业务技术准备。 今年以来，中国证监会先后放宽合格境外投资者参与境内商品期货、商品期权和ETF期权等产品的限制。此举旨在持续拓展合格境外投资者可投资范围， 发挥合格境外投资者制度的优势和吸引力，便利境外机构投资者特别是配置型资金运用适配的风险管理工具，有利于提升外资机构投资行为的稳定性，促 进其对A股的长期投资。 02 合格境外投资者参与ETF期权交易将于国庆假期后A股市场第一个交易日起（10月9日）正式实施。 9月30日，上交所、深交所分别发布《关于合格境外机构投资者和人民币合格境外机构投资者参与股票期权交易有关事项的通知》。 《通知》称，合格境外投资者可以参与在沪深交易所上市的交易型开放式指数基金期权（ETF期权）交易，交易目的限于套期保值。 合格境外投资 ...

增强外资对A股市场信心 今年以来，合格境外投资者可投资品种范围持续拓宽。2月份，上海期货交易所（以下简称"上期所"） 及其子公司上海国际能源交易中心、郑州商品交易所（以下简称"郑商所"）、大连商品交易所（以下简 称"大商所"）、广州期货交易所发布公告，合计向合格境外投资者新增开放29个商品期货期权品种；6 月份，上期所、郑商所、大商所再次向合格境外投资者新增开放16个商品期货期权品种；9月份，上期 所向合格境外投资者新增开放4个期货期权品种。 截至今年9月底，合格境外投资者可以参与交易的期货期权品种达到95个，包括88个商品期货期权品种 合约和7个股指期货期权品种合约。 据中国证监会公告，10月9日起，合格境外机构投资者（QFII）和人民币合格境外机构投资者 （RQFII）（以下合称"合格境外投资者"）可以参与场内ETF期权（即交易型开放式指数基金期权）交 易，交易目的限于套期保值。至此，合格境外投资者可参与境内期货期权品种达到104个。 业内人士表示，ETF期权是境内运行成熟的风险管理工具，合格境外投资者利用ETF期权进行风险管 理，有助于降低其投资组合波动，提升投资积极性，稳步增加对A股的长期投资。未来， ...

合格境外投资者可投资品种范围持续拓宽，目前可参与境内期货期权品种已达104个 本报记者 吴晓璐 据中国证监会公告，10月9日起，合格境外机构投资者（QFII）和人民币合格境外机构投资者（RQFII）（以下合称"合格 境外投资者"）可以参与场内ETF期权（即交易型开放式指数基金期权）交易，交易目的限于套期保值。至此，合格境外投资者 可参与境内期货期权品种达到104个。 制度优化有望持续 近年来，随着合格境外投资者制度优化，投资范围不断扩大，投资便利性提高，合格境外投资者数量迅速增长。中国证监 会网站最新数据显示，截至今年8月底，共有907家境外机构获得合格境外投资者资格。机构类型覆盖境外主权基金、国际组 织、政府投资机构、养老基金、资产管理机构、保险公司、投资银行等。 田利辉表示，近年来合格境外投资者制度优化，对外资吸引力提升，外资配置中国资产意愿与能力双提升。合格境外投资 者制度优化已从"准入"转向"便利"，从"单一"转向"多元"，彰显中国资本市场制度型开放的吸引力与包容性。 合格境外投资者通过深度参与中国资本市场发展，分享中国改革开放和经济增长成果的同时，也为国内市场注入资金活 水。数据显示，截至今年8月底 ...

人民财讯10月9日电，9月末外储再超3.3万亿美元，央行连续11个月增持黄金；证券期货违法行为吹哨 人奖励工作规定草案征求意见，较大幅度提高奖励标准；沪深交易所：合格境外投资者可参与ETF期权 交易，交易目的限于套期保值；10月9日起，北交所所有股票将全部切换为920新代码；我国科研人员解 决全固态金属锂电池界面接触难题；国庆档电影总票房突破18亿元，全年总票房有望冲击500亿元；美 国联邦政府时隔近七年再"停摆"；纳指涨1.12%，标普500指数涨0.58%，两者均创收盘新高，AMD涨超 11%。 ...

10月份币圈又有三大事件，这次必须要盯紧了，每一件都有极大可能点燃市场，10月9号我们这边是有重磅消息合格境外投资者了可以参与ETF期权的交易 了，这意味着什么了是活水要来了吗，紧接着10月12号关注以太坊L2分叉的升级，这会不会带来新的机会了，是以太带领市场走独立行情还是山寨季节的 开始了，压抽大戏在10月18号市场瞩目的solETF审核结果将公布，这即将是本月的悬念了！ 接下来看看行情，大饼的话日内最高到达了125126美元处最低到达了122000左右，目前上方关注新高的压力，下方的话关注120000美元处的支撑，目前上方 来回徘徊，接下来重点关注以太，最高到达了4755美元处，最低到达了4610美元处，接下来下方重点关注4550美元处，只要不跌破4550美元处，那就有机会 去触碰一下4800美元的强压目前就是耐心等待，明天国内股市开盘看币圈的资金会不会回流一些到那边去，山寨的话少部分还行，绝大部分一般般，现在还 是那句话不要想着和21年一样，牛来了山寨都会飞，现在这个牛从贝来德这种财团来了过后基本别人操盘的，基本资金都是ETF流入的，大饼为主很正常以 太在大饼后面很晚很晚才拉起来，大饼是共识最后散户玩不 ...

·证券期货违法行为吹哨人奖励工作规定征求意见较大幅度提高奖励标准 ·国家发展改革委：支持民营企业等深度参与"人工智能+"行动在资金上持续在算力等领域发放"人工智 能券" ·八部门发文推动有色金属行业稳增长目标增加值年均增长5% 再生金属产量突破2000万吨 ·商务部回应墨西哥对我国发起多起反倾销调查：坚决反对！将密切关注调查进展，保障中国企业合法 权益 ·沪深交易所：合格境外投资者可以参与ETF期权交易交易目的限于套期保值 ·美国联邦政府时隔近七年再"停摆" 特朗普：若持续时间较长或会出现裁员和项目削减 ·高市早苗当选日本自民党总裁 【重点关注】 ·中国驻美大使：中美要拉长合作清单 ·聚焦人民健康保障需求健康保险高质量发展指导意见落地 【国内要闻】 ·中国驻美国大使谢锋9月29日晚在中国驻美使馆国庆招待会上表示，中美要拉长合作清单，做大合作蛋 糕，实现双赢多赢。谢锋表示，中美要深化利益融合，做相互成就的同行者。打击非法移民、芬太尼、 电信诈骗、金融犯罪，开展癌症防治、传染性疾病和人工智能合作，这些完全可以成为双方合作亮点和 增长点。（新华社） ·世界贸易组织3日在瑞士日内瓦召开服务贸易理事会年度第三次会议。中 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that qualified foreign institutional investors (QFIIs) are now allowed to participate in ETF options trading starting from October 9, 2023, which is expected to enhance foreign investment in the A-share market [1][3][4] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has progressively relaxed restrictions on QFIIs' participation in domestic commodity futures, options, and ETF options, aiming to expand their investment scope and improve the stability of foreign investment behavior [1][6] - The Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges have issued notifications to accept applications from QFIIs for stock options trading, with specific requirements for hedging purposes [3][4] Group 2 - QFIIs can apply for long and short hedging positions and must report their A-share accounts through authorized options operating institutions before opening corresponding derivative accounts [3][4] - The introduction of ETF options is seen as a significant tool for risk management, which is expected to attract more long-term capital into the A-share market [6][7] - The article highlights that major foreign institutions have been actively investing in ETFs, with Barclays Bank holding over 19.2 billion yuan in listed funds, indicating a growing trend of foreign capital entering the Chinese market through ETFs [7][8]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The Shanghai Composite Index, large-cap blue-chip stocks, small and medium-cap stocks, and ChiNext stocks showed a market trend of gradually declining in the long position direction, then rebounding and rising, and finally oscillating at a high level [3]. - The implied volatility of financial options remained at a relatively high level of fluctuation [3]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct a long-biased buyer strategy and a bull spread combination strategy for call options; for index options, it is suitable to construct a long-biased seller strategy, a bull spread combination strategy for call options, and an arbitrage strategy between synthetic long futures of options and short futures [3]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 Financial Market Important Index Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,862.53, up 34.43 points or 0.90%, with a trading volume of 968.2 billion yuan, an increase of 40.3 billion yuan [3]. - The Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13,479.43, up 270.43 points or 2.05%, with a trading volume of 1,193.2 billion yuan, a decrease of 25.8 billion yuan [3]. - The SSE 50 Index closed at 2,973.04, up 32.02 points or 1.09%, with a trading volume of 190 billion yuan, an increase of 39.8 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 300 Index closed at 4,620.05, up 70.00 points or 1.54%, with a trading volume of 693.4 billion yuan, an increase of 94.7 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 500 Index closed at 7,350.56, up 109.65 points or 1.51%, with a trading volume of 433.9 billion yuan, an increase of 3.7 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 1000 Index closed at 7,497.83, up 100.24 points or 1.36%, with a trading volume of 419.5 billion yuan, a decrease of 17.3 billion yuan [3]. 3.2 Option Underlying ETF Market Overview - The SSE 50 ETF closed at 3.109, up 0.032 or 1.04%, with a trading volume of 12.6409 million shares, an increase of 12.5943 million shares, and a trading volume of 3.914 billion yuan, an increase of 2.479 billion yuan [4]. - The SSE 300 ETF closed at 4.728, up 0.077 or 1.66%, with a trading volume of 11.9544 million shares, an increase of 11.8828 million shares, and a trading volume of 5.620 billion yuan, an increase of 2.276 billion yuan [4]. - The SSE 500 ETF closed at 7.462, up 0.126 or 1.72%, with a trading volume of 3.3294 million shares, an increase of 3.3073 million shares, and a trading volume of 2.473 billion yuan, an increase of 0.839 billion yuan [4]. - The Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.543, up 0.019 or 1.25%, with a trading volume of 35.143 million shares, an increase of 34.8542 million shares, and a trading volume of 5.345 billion yuan, an increase of 0.899 billion yuan [4]. - The E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.510, up 0.017 or 1.14%, with a trading volume of 10.5311 million shares, an increase of 10.4435 million shares, and a trading volume of 1.566 billion yuan, an increase of 0.245 billion yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 300 ETF closed at 4.880, up 0.080 or 1.67%, with a trading volume of 2.5923 million shares, an increase of 2.5808 million shares, and a trading volume of 1.257 billion yuan, an increase of 0.702 billion yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 500 ETF closed at 2.980, up 0.046 or 1.57%, with a trading volume of 1.254 million shares, an increase of 1.2335 million shares, and a trading volume of 0.371 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.236 billion yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 100 ETF closed at 3.608, up 0.079 or 2.24%, with a trading volume of 0.7154 million shares, an increase of 0.7098 million shares, and a trading volume of 0.256 billion yuan, an increase of 0.057 billion yuan [4]. - The ChiNext ETF closed at 3.213, up 0.084 or 2.68%, with a trading volume of 16.3285 million shares, an increase of 16.1592 million shares, and a trading volume of 5.208 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.16 billion yuan [4]. 3.3 Option Factor - Volume and Position PCR - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.4737 million contracts, an increase of 0.6855 million contracts, the open interest was 1.2883 million contracts, an increase of 0.062 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.59, a decrease of 0.32, and the open interest PCR was 0.78, an increase of 0.02 [6]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.4472 million contracts, an increase of 0.5099 million contracts, the open interest was 1.1082 million contracts, an increase of 0.0283 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.87, a decrease of 0.35, and the open interest PCR was 1.04, a decrease of 0.01 [6]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.5295 million contracts, an increase of 0.086 million contracts, the open interest was 1.0855 million contracts, an increase of 0.0289 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.91, a decrease of 0.28, and the open interest PCR was 1.29, a decrease of 0.01 [6]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.4806 million contracts, an increase of 0.0463 million contracts, the open interest was 1.7509 million contracts, an increase of 0.0807 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.87, a decrease of 0.09, and the open interest PCR was 1.04, a decrease of 0.02 [6]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 0.314 million contracts, an increase of 0.0295 million contracts, the open interest was 0.4785 million contracts, an increase of 0.0301 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.80, an increase of 0.03, and the open interest PCR was 0.96, a decrease of 0.01 [6]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 0.2741 million contracts, an increase of 0.1395 million contracts, the open interest was 0.2646 million contracts, an increase of 0.0361 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.92, an increase of 0.14, and the open interest PCR was 0.84, an increase of 0.06 [6]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 0.2622 million contracts, an increase of 0.0865 million contracts, the open interest was 0.318 million contracts, an increase of 0.0126 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 1.02, a decrease of 0.04, and the open interest PCR was 0.88, an increase of 0.02 [6]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the trading volume was 0.1279 million contracts, an increase of 0.0034 million contracts, the open interest was 0.1178 million contracts, an increase of 0.0049 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 2.92, a decrease of 0.34, and the open interest PCR was 1.16, a decrease of 0.02 [6]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the trading volume was 1.7877 million contracts, an increase of 0.0179 million contracts, the open interest was 1.5818 million contracts, an increase of 0.0333 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.92, a decrease of 0.10, and the open interest PCR was 1.33, an increase of 0.14 [6]. - For the SSE 50 index option, the trading volume was 0.0741 million contracts, an increase of 0.0456 million contracts, the open interest was 0.0714 million contracts, an increase of 0.0017 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.45, a decrease of 0.10, and the open interest PCR was 0.70, an increase of 0.04 [6]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the trading volume was 0.176 million contracts, an increase of 0.0696 million contracts, the open interest was 0.1786 million contracts, an increase of 0.0024 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.55, a decrease of 0.21, and the open interest PCR was 0.92, an increase of 0.05 [6]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the trading volume was 0.3066 million contracts, an increase of 0.0241 million contracts, the open interest was 0.2735 million contracts, a decrease of 0.0001 million contracts, the trading volume PCR was 0.80, a decrease of 0.27, and the open interest PCR was 0.99, an increase of 0.02 [6]. 3.4 Option Factor - Pressure Point and Support Point - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 3.109, the at-the-money strike price was 3.10, the pressure point was 3.10, the pressure point deviation was 0.00, the support point was 3.10, the support point deviation was 0.10, the maximum long position of call options was 128,775 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 86,084 contracts [8]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 4.728, the at-the-money strike price was 4.70, the pressure point was 4.70, the pressure point deviation was 0.00, the support point was 4.60, the support point deviation was 0.00, the maximum long position of call options was 87,647 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 83,270 contracts [8]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 7.462, the at-the-money strike price was 7.50, the pressure point was 7.50, the pressure point deviation was 0.00, the support point was 7.00, the support point deviation was 0.00, the maximum long position of call options was 81,999 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 92,250 contracts [8]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.543, the at-the-money strike price was 1.55, the pressure point was 1.55, the pressure point deviation was 0.00, the support point was 1.50, the support point deviation was 0.15, the maximum long position of call options was 94,489 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 64,694 contracts [8]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.510, the at-the-money strike price was 1.50, the pressure point was 1.50, the pressure point deviation was 0.00, the support point was 1.35, the support point deviation was 0.00, the maximum long position of call options was 30,321 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 16,868 contracts [8]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 4.880, the at-the-money strike price was 4.90, the pressure point was 5.00, the pressure point deviation was 0.10, the support point was 4.80, the support point deviation was 0.00, the maximum long position of call options was 18,754 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 17,107 contracts [8]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.980, the at-the-money strike price was 3.00, the pressure point was 3.00, the pressure point deviation was 0.05, the support point was 2.95, the support point deviation was 0.00, the maximum long position of call options was 18,749 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 12,971 contracts [8]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 3.608, the at-the-money strike price was 3.60, the pressure point was 3.60, the pressure point deviation was 0.00, the support point was 3.50, the support point deviation was 0.00, the maximum long position of call options was 12,164 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 8,031 contracts [8]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the underlying closing price was 3.213, the at-the-money strike price was 3.20, the pressure point was 3.20, the pressure point deviation was 0.00, the support point was 3.10, the support point deviation was 0.00, the maximum long position of call options was 101,833 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 84,037 contracts [8]. - For the SSE 50 index option, the underlying closing price was 2,973.04, the at-the-money strike price was 2,950, the pressure point was 3,000, the pressure point deviation was 0, the support point was 2,850, the support point deviation was 0, the maximum long position of call options was 5,255 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 3,517 contracts [8]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the underlying closing price was 4,620.05, the at-the-money strike price was 4,600, the pressure point was 4,600, the pressure point deviation was 0, the support point was 4,500, the support point deviation was 0, the maximum long position of call options was 8,031 contracts, and the maximum long position of put options was 9,327 contracts [8]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the underlying closing price was 7,497.83, the at-the-money strike price was 7,500, the pressure point was 7,500, the pressure point deviation was 0, the support point was 7,000, the support point deviation was 0, the maximum long position of call options

金融期权 2025-09-29 金融期权策略早报 | 卢品先 | 投研经理 | 从业资格号：F3047321 | 交易咨询号：Z0015541 | 邮箱：lupx@wkqh.cn | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 黄柯涵 | 期权研究员 | 从业资格号：F03138607 | 电话：0755-23375252 | 邮箱：huangkh@wkqh.cn | 金融期权策略早报概要： （1）股市短评：上证综指数、大盘蓝筹股、中小盘股和创业板股表现为多头方向上逐渐下降回落后反弹回升后高 位震荡的市场行情。 （2）金融期权波动性分析：金融期权隐含波动率维持较高水平波动。 （3）金融期权策略与建议：对于ETF期权来说，适合构建偏多头的买方策略，认购期权牛市价差组合策略；对于股 指期权来说，适合构建偏多头的卖方策略、认购期权牛市价差组合策略和期权合成期货多头与期货空头做套利策略 表1：金融市场重要指数概况 | 重要指数 | 指数代码 | 收盘价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 | 成交额 | 额变化 | PE | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- ...

Report Summary 1) Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. 2) Core Viewpoints of the Report - The stock market shows a market trend where the Shanghai Composite Index, large - cap blue - chip stocks, small and medium - cap stocks, and ChiNext stocks decline on the long - position side, then rebound and oscillate at a high level [3]. - The implied volatility of financial options maintains a relatively high - level fluctuation [3]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct a long - biased buyer strategy and a bull spread combination strategy of call options; for index options, it is suitable to construct a long - biased seller strategy, a bull spread combination strategy of call options, and an arbitrage strategy between synthetic long futures of options and short futures [3]. 3) Summary by Relevant Catalogs Stock Market Overview - **Important Indexes**: The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,853.30, down 0.01%; the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13,445.90, up 0.67%; the SSE 50 closed at 2,952.74, up 0.45%; the CSI 300 closed at 4,593.49, up 0.60%; the CSI 500 closed at 7,341.32, up 0.24%; the CSI 1000 closed at 7,506.51, down 0.37% [3]. - **ETF Market**: Different ETFs showed different price changes, such as the SSE 50 ETF closing at 3.087, up 0.49%, and the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closing at 1.548, up 1.18% [4]. Option Factor Analysis - **Volume and Position PCR**: Different option varieties have different volume and position PCR values and their changes, which can be used to describe the strength of the option underlying market and the turning point of the underlying market [6][7]. - **Pressure and Support Points**: By looking at the strike prices of the maximum positions of call and put options, the pressure and support points of the option underlying can be determined, such as the pressure point of the SSE 50 ETF is 3.10 and the support point is 3.00 [8][10]. - **Implied Volatility**: The implied volatility of options, including at - the - money implied volatility and weighted implied volatility, shows different levels and changes for different option varieties [11][12]. Strategy and Recommendations - **Overall Strategy**: The financial option sector is divided into several sub - sectors, and different option strategies are recommended for each sub - sector, including directional strategies, volatility strategies, and spot long - position covered call strategies [13]. - **Sub - sector Strategies** - **Financial Stocks**: For the SSE 50 ETF and SSE 50, construct a seller long - biased combination strategy and a spot long - position covered call strategy [14]. - **Large - cap Blue - chip Stocks**: For the SSE 300 ETF, SZSE 300 ETF, and CSI 300, construct a bull spread combination strategy of call options, a short - volatility strategy, and a spot long - position covered call strategy [14]. - **Medium - sized Stocks**: For the SZSE 100 ETF, construct a bull spread combination strategy of call options, a short - volatility strategy, and a spot long - position covered call strategy [15]. - **Small - cap Stocks**: For the SSE 500 ETF, SZSE 500 ETF, and CSI 1000, construct a bull spread combination strategy of call options, a short - volatility strategy (for CSI 1000), and a spot long - position covered call strategy [15][16]. - **ChiNext Stocks**: For the ChiNext ETF, Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF, and E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF, construct a bull call option combination strategy, a short - volatility strategy, and a spot long - position covered call strategy [16].