Group 1 - The article highlights the growing trend of tourists engaging in traditional Tibetan clothing photography as a way to experience and connect with local culture [1][2] - The Star River Photography Studio showcases a variety of representative Tibetan costumes, emphasizing the cultural significance of these garments in the tourism experience [1][2] - The presence of numerous photography shops and Tibetan clothing stores in Barkhor Street reflects the prosperity of the travel photography industry in Lhasa and tourists' appreciation for Tibetan clothing culture [2] Group 2 - The experience of wearing ethnic costumes and walking through historical Barkhor Street enhances the immersive travel experience, as noted by a tourist [2] - The manager of Star River Photography Studio describes Tibetan clothing photography as an important medium for tourists to establish emotional connections and a sense of belonging [2] - Customization and a wide selection of ready-made Tibetan clothing are offered by local shops, catering to tourists' desires for uniqueness and personalization [2]

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the supermarket "胖都来" (Pang Du Lai) and its similarity to the well-known "胖东来" (Pang Dong Lai) has escalated, with legal actions being taken and various parties involved facing public backlash [1][2][12]. Group 1: Company Actions and Responses - "胖都来" is currently handling legal communications and is planning to address naming issues in the future [1][7]. - The company claims to have authorization from a brand management service to sell discounted products from Inditex, the parent company of ZARA, despite Inditex denying any involvement [9][12]. - The official video from "胖都来" has been taken down, and its Douyin account is currently suspended until June 9 [2][6]. Group 2: Public and Legal Reactions - The launch of "胖都来" has led to accusations of "brand hijacking" from "胖东来," with legal experts suggesting a high probability of trademark infringement [2][12]. - Various celebrities who participated in the opening ceremony of "胖都来" have issued apologies, clarifying that they did not receive any payment for their involvement [10][11]. - The public reaction has been mixed, with some supporting "胖都来" while others criticize it for attempting to capitalize on "胖东来"'s reputation [12][13]. Group 3: Legal and Trademark Considerations - Legal experts indicate that "胖都来" may have intentionally chosen a name similar to "胖东来" to benefit from its established brand recognition, which could be seen as a deliberate attempt to infringe on trademark rights [12][13]. - The trademark registration process does not guarantee the right to use a name if it infringes on existing rights, highlighting the complexities of trademark law in this case [13].

关于上海开开实业股份有限公司 向特定对象发行股票申请文件的审核问询函 之回复专项核查意见 上会业函字(2025)第 190 号 上海证券交易所： 上会会计师事务所(特殊普通合伙)（以下简称"我们"、"申报会计师"）通过 上海开开实业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"、"发行人"）收悉贵所于 2024 年 10 月 24 日下发的《关于上海开开实业股份有限公司向特定对象发行股票申请文 件的审核问询函》（上证上审（再融资）〔2024〕241 号）（以下简称"问询函"）。 根据问询函要求，我们就问询函中要求申报会计师核查和发表意见的事项进行了 核查，现将核查情况予以说明。 本回复中涉及货币金额的单位，如无特别指明，均为人民币元。若出现总数 与分项数值之和尾数不符的情况，均为四舍五入原因造成。 7-2-1 问题 1.关于经营情况 根据申报材料，1）报告期内，发行人的营业收入分别 66,983.04 万元、 89,417.19 万元、92,507.04 万元和 48,952.05 万元，扣非归母净利润分别为 444.62 万元、1,414.20 万元、944.56 万元和 329.38 万元；2）报告期各期，公 司经营活动 ...