Core Viewpoint - Thumzup Media Corporation is expanding its digital asset strategy to include a broader range of cryptocurrencies beyond Bitcoin, aiming to enhance financial flexibility and support the growth of its AdTech platform [1][2][3] Company Strategy - The Board of Directors has authorized management to accumulate additional cryptocurrencies, specifically Dogecoin (DOGE), Litecoin (LITE), Solana (SOL), Ripple (XRP), Ether (ETH), and USD Coin (USDC) [1][2] - This initiative builds on the existing strategy that allows the company to hold up to 90% of its liquid assets in Bitcoin, with current holdings of 19.106 BTC valued at approximately $2.1 million as of July 8, 2025 [2] Management Perspective - The CEO of Thumzup stated that diversifying into other leading cryptocurrencies aligns with the company's commitment to innovation and prudent treasury management, which could enhance financial flexibility as the company scales its operations [3] Product Offering - Thumzup Media Corporation is focused on democratizing the social media branding and marketing industry through its flagship product, the Thumzup platform, which allows users to earn cash for posting about participating advertisers [3]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding the company's performance and competitive position during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify misrepresented the shift of its customers' ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's capabilities were limited and faced competition from platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is alleged that developing technology for closed platforms was more costly and time-consuming than communicated to investors [3]. - The monetization of Activation Services on closed platforms was expected to take several years, contrary to the company's claims [3]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to implement AI solutions on closed platforms, affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to known bots, impacting its financial integrity [3]. - Risk disclosures from DoubleVerify were claimed to be misleading, presenting ongoing issues as hypothetical risks [3]. Group 2: Impact on Stock Price - On February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify issued lower-than-expected Q1 2024 revenue growth guidance, leading to a stock drop of over 21% [4]. - On May 7, 2024, the company cut its full-year 2024 revenue outlook due to reduced ad spending, resulting in a nearly 39% decline in stock price [5]. - On February 27, 2025, disappointing Q4 2024 earnings were reported, revealing the negative impact of the shift to closed platforms, causing shares to fall more than 36% [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited, impacting its competitive position against platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [3]. - The lawsuit states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was communicated to shareholders [3]. - Competitors of DoubleVerify were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data center server farms, raising concerns about its billing practices [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, as they downplayed already materialized adverse facts [3]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares of DoubleVerify during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in potential recovery efforts [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1]. Allegations - Allegations include that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities and competition with platforms like Meta and Amazon [1]. - The complaint states that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [1]. - It is claimed that monetization of these services would take several years, impacting the company's profitability [1]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings, further impairing DoubleVerify's competitive edge [1]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots, raising concerns about its billing practices [1]. - Risk disclosures from DoubleVerify were characterized as misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [1]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [1]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in the case without any cost or obligation [2]. - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the lifecycle of the case [2]. About the Law Firm - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm focused on protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [3]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [3].

Group 1: Streaming Industry Trends - Streaming viewership surpassed the combined total of broadcast and cable viewership for the first time in May 2025, with streaming viewership increasing by 71% over the past four years, while broadcast and cable viewership dropped by 21% and 39%, respectively [1] - The programmatic ad market is massive, with estimates indicating that 91% of digital advertising and at least 56% of total global advertising is programmatic, and global advertising spending is expected to reach $1 trillion this year [6] Group 2: The Trade Desk Overview - The Trade Desk operates as a Demand Side Platform (DSP), executing programmatic advertising purchases on behalf of its clients [3] - The Trade Desk adds value by providing clients with a wealth of useful data during the ad bidding process [4] Group 3: Financial Performance and Valuation - The Trade Desk's stock experienced a decline after missing earnings estimates for the first time in eight years in Q4 2024, leading to valuation metrics dropping significantly below historical averages, with the price-to-sales ratio being 82% off its five-year average [9][11] - Despite the earnings miss, The Trade Desk reported a 22% year-over-year sales growth to $741 million in Q4 2024 and a full-year sales growth of 26%, surpassing $2.4 billion [12] - The company reported encouraging Q1 2025 results with a 25% growth in sales reaching $616 million year-over-year, and operating income nearly doubled from $28.7 million to $54.5 million [12] - The Trade Desk is in a strong financial position with $1.7 billion in cash and investments, current assets of $4.9 billion, and $386 million in common stock repurchased during the quarter [13] Group 4: Investment Potential - The Trade Desk is considered to be growing rapidly, in great financial shape, and significantly undervalued, making it an attractive buy for investors at this time [14]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by July 21, 2025 [3]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of customers' ad spending to closed platforms where DoubleVerify's capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that the company overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots and that its risk disclosures were materially false and misleading [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the defendants' positive statements about DoubleVerify's business lacked a reasonable basis, leading to investor damages when the true details became public [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, securing over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by July 21, 2025 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own success in recovering significant amounts for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, achieving the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and securing over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone [4]. Group 3: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of customer ad spending to closed platforms where its capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's high-margin advertising optimization services faced significant challenges in monetization due to the high costs and time required for technology development on closed platforms [5]. - The lawsuit also points out that DoubleVerify overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots and that its risk disclosures were misleading, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5].

NEW YORK, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. ("DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc." or the "Company") (NYSE: DV) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between November 10, 2023 and February 27, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: ...

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited, impacting its competitive position against platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [3]. - The lawsuit states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was communicated to shareholders [3]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots, which were known to operate from data center server farms [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, as they downplayed already materialized adverse facts [3]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares of DoubleVerify during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in potential recovery [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for alleged securities fraud and unlawful business practices [2][3]. Company Performance - On February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify lowered its revenue growth expectations for Q1 2024, leading to a stock price drop of $8.35 per share, or 21.3%, closing at $30.89 on February 29, 2024 [3]. - On May 7, 2024, the company cut its full-year 2024 revenue outlook due to reduced ad spending from customers, resulting in a stock price decline of $11.79 per share, or 38.6%, closing at $18.78 on May 8, 2024 [4]. - On February 27, 2025, DoubleVerify reported lower-than-expected Q4 2024 sales and earnings, with a stock price drop of approximately 36%, closing at $13.90 on February 28, 2025 [5]. Market Research Findings - On March 28, 2025, Adalytics Research, LLC released a report claiming that DoubleVerify's advertisement verification services are ineffective, stating that customers are billed for ad impressions served to bots [6]. - The Wall Street Journal reported that DoubleVerify frequently fails to detect nonhuman traffic, contradicting the company's claims of helping brands avoid serving ads to bot accounts [6].