Group 1 - The article discusses the evolution of science and its relationship with human existence, highlighting a crisis in scientific understanding and its implications for society [3][4][18] - It emphasizes the need for a new scientific worldview that reconnects science with direct human experience, moving away from the traditional dichotomy of subjectivity and objectivity [21][27][28] - The authors argue that the current scientific crisis stems from a "blind spot" in scientific philosophy, which prioritizes abstract mathematical concepts over direct human experience [9][10][15] Group 2 - The article outlines the significance of social sciences in understanding reality as constructed through shared human experiences, emphasizing the concept of intersubjectivity [22][24] - It critiques the tendency in both natural and social sciences to abstract and separate research from direct human experience, which can lead to a misunderstanding of social realities [24][29] - The authors propose that integrating direct experience into scientific inquiry can lead to a more nuanced understanding of social constructs and the mechanisms behind them [27][28][30]

Core Viewpoint - The book "What is Science: What Science Is and What It Is Not" addresses the urgent need for a new scientific worldview that acknowledges human experience, which has been overlooked in contemporary scientific discourse [4][5][14]. Group 1: Scientific Blind Spots - The authors argue that the current scientific worldview is in crisis, failing to account for human experience, subjectivity, and meaning, which are essential for understanding our place in the world [6][10]. - The concept of "blind spots" refers to the neglect of direct human experience in scientific understanding, leading to a significant meaning crisis in science [7][9]. - The book identifies several key philosophical positions that contribute to these blind spots, including dualism, reductionism, objectivism, and physicalism, which shape the prevailing scientific worldview [9][10]. Group 2: Urgency of Change - The authors express deep concern over the implications of scientific blind spots, particularly in the context of global crises such as climate change and pandemics, which are exacerbated by scientific advancements [5][6][14]. - They emphasize the need for a revolutionary scientific worldview that integrates human experience as a fundamental component of scientific inquiry, rather than treating it as an afterthought [14][19]. - The book critiques three common responses to the meaning crisis in science: scientific triumphalism, scientific denialism, and the New Age movement, all of which fail to address the underlying issues [11][12]. Group 3: Structure of the Book - The book is divided into four main parts, each addressing different aspects of the scientific blind spots: the origins of the blind spot concept, the implications for physics, life sciences, and the broader societal impacts, including climate change and ecological crises [15][16]. - The first part discusses the philosophical roots of the blind spot, while subsequent sections explore its manifestations in various scientific fields and the resulting societal challenges [15][16]. - The authors aim to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding how these blind spots have developed and how they can be addressed to foster a more inclusive scientific narrative [17][18].