中青报·中青网记者 魏其濛 在中共一大纪念馆的尾厅留言墙上，来自各个国家的观众用不同语言留下参观感悟。德国观众延斯 （Jens）写道："我们为中国人民在共产党带领下取得的成就感到自豪。"意大利参观者吉安卢卡 （Gianluca）以母语留下感言："我在中国感受到的集体归属感，让我满怀希望。"一位没有表明国籍的 参观者写道："这是一个开始，我还会再来。" 百年前，上海便是"东学西渐"的重要窗口；如今，作为全国最大的入境口岸，上海正依托中国免签政策 持续落地的红利，迎来入境客流的大幅增长。 中青报·中青网记者了解到，2023年以来，中共一大纪念馆接待的境内外观众逐年增加，境外游客已涵 盖全球几十个国家和地区，占比逐年稳步提升。他们中有向往红色历史的普通旅行者，也有开展学术研 究的历史学者、参与文化交流的团体访客，以及关注中国发展的国际友人。2025年，中共一大纪念馆共 接待观众超过323万人次，其中境外观众近10万人次。 中共一大纪念馆宣教专员张粟感受到，随着外国人144小时过境免签政策的推行，来上海旅游、参观、 学习的境外游客越来越多了。"中共一大纪念馆位于新天地，这里既是一大会址所在地，也是充满时尚 气息的商业 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the traditional practice of "combined criticism" in Chinese literary criticism, tracing its evolution from the Wei-Jin period to the Tang-Song era, highlighting how it shapes aesthetic judgments and contributes to literary history [2] - The work of young scholar Wang Haihan redefines the relationship between Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren, presenting them as a "literary community" during the May Fourth Movement, focusing on their shared cultural practices rather than their differences [3][4] - The author emphasizes a methodology of "harmony in difference," arguing that the commonality of the "Li Ren" concept among Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren serves as a foundation for their literary practices, which can be analyzed through their collaborative efforts in the journal "New Youth" [4][5] Group 2 - The book traces the establishment and collaborative division of labor within the Zhou brothers' literary community during the May Fourth period, examining how the "Li Ren" concept evolved into a cultural project reflected in their stylistic choices and rhetorical strategies [5][6] - The author critiques mainstream literary interpretations that focus solely on content or form, advocating for a return to the artists' perspectives and their conscious stylistic practices, which address social and ideological issues [6] - The methodology employed in the book opens new avenues for studying the Zhou brothers and the historical context of May Fourth literature, while also acknowledging the potential risks of hindsight in historical narratives [8]

民国初年的北京是一座官气十足的城市，辛亥革命后建立起来的北洋政府，虽然搭起了议会政治的架 子，但骨子里仍不脱清朝官僚政治的气味，日日以党派纷争名利奔竞为要事。官僚政治本带有享乐主义 的色彩，选色征歌、酒食征逐被视为寻常。参众两院设于宣武门内的象房桥，毗邻南城，而南城向为北 京的繁华所在，除了前门附近的酒楼饭馆，虎坊桥以北的八大胡同，还有1914年政府为装点首都门面建 设的聚集各种娱乐设施的香厂新市区，都是议员们经常出入的场所。北京的官气不仅弥漫于政界，教育 界、新闻界亦免不了受熏染。以全国最高学府著称的北京大学的学生们，也是八大胡同的常客。北京的 报馆多设于宣武门外，与参众两院只隔了一道内城城墙，报纸舆论往往为不同的政党派系所把控。在有 识之士看来，彼时北京实充满了污浊的空气。 1916年袁世凯自称为帝，北京的政治生活腐败到了极点，6月6日袁世凯去世后，黎元洪继任总统，国会 恢复，略有复苏的气象，新闻界的反应最敏感，一时复刊和新办的报纸就有七十多家。但大部分报纸仍 旧延续着此前的恶劣状态，"或流为政党之工具，或沦为谋利之机关，十有八九，了无生气"。1916年8 月，研究系领袖汤化龙在京创办《晨钟报》，设馆址于 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the historical significance of the "Peking University Red Building" as a site of revolutionary activities and cultural movements in China, particularly its role in the May Fourth Movement and the early dissemination of Marxism in China. Historical Significance - The Red Building, completed in 1918, served as the main site for Peking University, housing the library and various departments, and has undergone multiple renovations since the founding of New China [4]. - It is now a key venue for showcasing the New Culture Movement, the May Fourth Movement, and the early activities of the Communist Party in Beijing, with six original sites restored to reflect historical scenes [5]. Educational Impact - The building hosts over 2,000 artifacts, documents, and artworks that are significant to the history of Marxism's introduction to China, including early student exam papers graded by Li Dazhao [7]. - The Red Building has developed various educational programs, including lectures and workshops, aimed at engaging students with red culture and history [11]. Student Engagement - Students from various universities express a deepened understanding of history through their visits, feeling a connection to the revolutionary spirit of their predecessors [3][17]. - The building has a volunteer guide program, with students actively participating in sharing the history and significance of the artifacts on display [13][15]. Cultural Legacy - The Red Building has become a hub for cultural activities, including the "Awakening Era" research activities, which encourage students to explore and contribute to the understanding of revolutionary history [11]. - The site attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors annually, fostering a sense of continuity and responsibility among the youth to carry forward the legacy of their forebears [15][17].

Group 1 - The literary revolution during the New Culture Movement is often misunderstood, with scholars like Hu Shi and Zhou Zuoren noting that the success of this movement is often overestimated [1][2] - Hu Shi emphasized that the literary revolution was a deliberate effort to elevate popular novels to their rightful place in Chinese literary history, indicating a significant shift in societal values [3][4] - The interaction between societal changes and the development of thought is crucial for understanding the literary revolution and the New Culture Movement [2][3] Group 2 - The collaboration between Hu Shi and Chen Duxiu was pivotal for the rapid success of the literary revolution, with their differing approaches complementing each other [4][5] - Hu Shi's initial expectation was that the vernacular movement would take 25 to 30 years to succeed, while Chen Duxiu's assertive stance helped garner significant attention for the movement [4][5] - The disconnect between Western-educated students and domestic intellectual discourse highlighted the need for better communication and engagement with the broader society [5][6] Group 3 - The literary revolution aimed to raise the status of popular literature, thereby enhancing the role of the reading public, particularly marginalized readers [3][4] - The movement provided a pathway for marginalized readers to become more engaged and active participants in the literary landscape [3][4] - The relationship between the proponents of the literary revolution and the general public reflects a broader trend of challenging traditional hierarchies in society [3][4] Group 4 - The misunderstanding of the literary revolution's success is evident in the limited readership of vernacular literature, which primarily attracted a specific segment of the population rather than the general public [25][26] - The actual readers of new literary works were often young, marginal intellectuals who aspired to ascend to elite status, rather than the broader populace [26][30] - The literary revolution's impact was more pronounced among intellectuals and aspiring elites, indicating a disconnect with the general public [32][34]