编辑 | summer 此前，东方卫视《喝彩中华》的舞台上，小孙女蔡乐艺登台后，先自报自己的爷爷是76岁昆曲表演艺术家蔡正仁和，引得徐帆、王珮瑜、程雷、霍尊几位 观察员集体起立致敬。可以看到，这也是当前社交媒体中关于"星二代"现象的一次集中审视。 表面上看，公众议论的焦点更多指向于星二代的轮番上阵，然而，更深层次的集体情绪，实则围绕一个核心矛盾展开：他们所天然享有的光环，是否与其 展现出的个人实力与职业素养相匹配？ 当星二代亮相被众人普遍认为仅有家庭背书而缺乏与之对应的专业能力或努力时，大家的批判显得尤为激烈。 事实上，在传统梨园，"子承父业"往往意味着更严苛的训练和更早的童子功，这被视为一种技艺的传承。但在流量时代的娱乐圈，公众看到的往往不 是"十年磨一剑"的技艺传承，而是父辈直接将积累的社会声望变现为子辈的商业机会。 当"继承"不再局限于技艺，而是"曝光率"和"入场券"时，这场跨越具体个案的讨论也已超越娱乐八卦的范畴，上升为一场公共思辨。 PART 1 不平等的起点 所有的父母都希望自己的孩子能够得到最好的照顾和教育，然而，父母能够给予自己深爱的孩子们的资源、天赋、机会却不尽相同。 美国社会学家安妮.拉鲁 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses President Trump's measures against Harvard University, including cutting federal funding and intervening in admissions policies, which has sparked widespread attention [1] - There is a notable divide in public opinion on Trump's actions, with some supporting the measures from ideological perspectives, viewing Harvard as a bastion of "leftist" ideology and blaming it for various societal issues [2][6] - The sentiment against elite institutions like Harvard is rooted in a long-standing tradition of anti-intellectualism in American society, as explored in Richard Hofstadter's book "Anti-intellectualism in American Life" [4][5] Group 2 - Hofstadter distinguishes between "intellect" and "intelligence," highlighting how practical intelligence is valued in American culture, while critical and reflective intellect is often marginalized [5] - The book illustrates how anti-intellectualism manifests across various sectors, including religion, politics, business culture, and education, revealing a recurring social sentiment against intellectualism [6] - The backlash against Harvard and similar institutions reflects a deeper cultural current of anti-elitism and skepticism towards higher education, which can undermine public reasoning and critical thinking [6] Group 3 - Michael Sandel's "The Tyranny of Merit" provides a counterpoint to the critique of anti-intellectualism by examining the responsibilities of elites and the ethical dilemmas of meritocracy [8][9] - Sandel argues that the obsession with meritocracy creates divisions and resentment, as it leads to a lack of empathy for those who struggle, framing their failures as personal shortcomings rather than systemic issues [10][11] - The phenomenon of Trump can be seen as a reaction to the arrogance of elites, with Harvard representing a microcosm of broader societal issues related to privilege and inequality [11] Group 4 - The economic context surrounding Trump's actions is explored through the lens of two books that address public misconceptions about economic issues, including immigration and trade [12][13] - "Good Economics for Hard Times" by Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo aims to clarify economic narratives and correct misunderstandings that contribute to societal tensions [13][14] - The book emphasizes the importance of equitable distribution and the pursuit of human welfare, providing a framework for understanding the economic backdrop of political sentiments [15] Group 5 - "Strangers in Their Own Land" by Arlie Russell Hochschild delves into the individual experiences of conservative communities, revealing their feelings of alienation and betrayal in the face of social change [17][18] - Hochschild's research highlights the emotional narratives that shape political views, particularly among those who feel overlooked by the government and societal progress [19] - The parallels between Hochschild's findings and the sentiments of Trump's supporters illustrate a broader trend of discontent among marginalized groups in America [19] Group 6 - Richard Hofstadter's "The Paranoid Style in American Politics" provides historical context for understanding the rhetoric and mobilization strategies seen in Trump's political discourse [22][23] - The book traces the "paranoid style" in American politics, characterized by exaggerated fears and conspiratorial thinking, which resonates with contemporary political narratives [24] - This historical perspective helps to analyze the emotional and rhetorical underpinnings of Trump's support, revealing a pattern of distrust and division in American political culture [24] Group 7 - Karl Marx's "The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte" offers insights into the dynamics of power and class struggle, relevant for understanding Trump's rise and governance style [26][27] - Marx's analysis of political maneuvering amidst class conflict provides a framework for examining how Trump appeals to disaffected groups while potentially serving elite interests [28][29] - The book's exploration of historical patterns of political authority and social division can inform contemporary discussions about populism and elite dynamics in the U.S. [29]