第三人王永未作陈述。 法院经审理认为，《北京市小客车数量调控暂行规定》第二条规定，本市实施小客车数量调控措施；第 七条规定，指标有效期为12个月，不得转让。 根据上述规定，涉案机动车车辆登记于王永名下，王永为该车辆的权利人。张成主张其全款购买涉案车 辆并实际占有，车辆未登记于其名下系因张成没有北京市小客车购车指标，故租赁王永的购车指标购买 涉案车辆，其为涉案车辆的所有权人。张成虽与王永签订了小客车指标租赁协议，但该协议因违反法律 法规的强制性规定而无效。涉案车辆未登记于张成名下，不得对抗作为债权人的善意第三人谢正。张成 于执行异议诉讼程序中要求确认涉案车辆为其所有并要求停止对车辆的执行行为，缺乏事实及法律依 据。法院最终驳回原告的全部诉讼请求。 新京报讯(记者张静姝通讯员李文凤)张成(化名)租赁他人指标用于购买车辆，并登记于指标人名下。后 指标人因无法偿还他人债务，名下财产被强制执行，该车辆被查封，在执行过程中，张成提起案外人执 行异议之诉，将申请执行人诉至法院，要求确认涉案车辆为其所有，停止对涉案车辆的执行。北京市海 淀区法院日前审理此案，判决驳回张成的诉请。 张成诉称，其全款购买凯迪拉克轿车一辆，现场与王 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the importance of transparency and effective communication in the automotive service industry, particularly regarding safety standards and consumer rights [1][2][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Mr. Chen, a long-time Cadillac owner, trusted a 4S dealership for repairs after an accident in 2020, which included 47 repair items costing over 52,000 yuan, including a tire replacement for 1,127 yuan [1]. - During a recent vehicle inspection, Mr. Chen was informed that his tires did not match in tread pattern, preventing him from passing the inspection, leading him to discover that the dealership had replaced his tire with a non-original part without proper disclosure [1]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The 4S dealership claimed they verbally informed Mr. Chen about the non-original tire replacement and noted it on the final bill, asserting that the customer’s signature indicated acceptance [2]. - However, the court found discrepancies in the dealership's documentation, noting that earlier bills indicated original parts, and the change to non-original was not clearly highlighted [2]. Group 3: Court Ruling and Implications - The court ruled that the dealership's failure to adequately inform Mr. Chen about the tire replacement constituted fraud, ordering the dealership to refund the tire cost of 1,127 yuan and pay triple damages of 3,381 yuan [2]. - The ruling emphasizes the need for service providers to elevate their disclosure obligations to ensure effective communication, especially regarding safety standards and risks [3].