Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of dynamic strategy configuration in quantitative investing, highlighting the limitations of traditional models and proposing a new framework based on large language models (LLM) for better adaptability to changing market conditions [2][3][5]. Group 1: Evolution of Quantitative Investing - Over the past decade, quantitative investing in the A-share market has evolved significantly, driven by the search for "Alpha factors" that can predict stock returns [5]. - The rapid increase in the number of Alpha factors does not directly translate to improved returns due to the quick decay of Alpha and the homogenization of factors among different institutions [5][12]. Group 2: Challenges in Factor Combination - Different factor combination models exhibit significant performance differences across market phases, making it difficult to find a single model that performs optimally in all conditions [12]. - Traditional models, such as mean-variance optimization, are sensitive to input parameters, leading to instability in performance [14][15]. - Machine learning models, while powerful, often suffer from a "black box" issue, making it hard for fund managers to trust their decisions during critical moments [16][18]. Group 3: Proposed LLM-Based Framework - The proposed "Judgment-Inference Framework" consists of three layers: training, analysis, and decision-making [2][3][19]. - **Training Layer**: Runs a diverse set of selected Alpha models to create a robust strategy library [22]. - **Analysis Layer**: Conducts automated performance analysis of models and generates structured performance reports based on market conditions [24][27]. - **Decision Layer**: Utilizes LLM to integrate information from the analysis layer and make informed weight allocation decisions [28][31]. Group 4: Empirical Results - Backtesting results on the CSI 300 index show that the LLM-based dynamic strategy configuration can achieve an annualized excess return of 7.21%, outperforming equal-weighted and single model benchmarks [3][41]. - The LLM dynamic combination exhibited a maximum drawdown of -9.47%, lower than all benchmark models, indicating effective risk management [44]. Group 5: Future Enhancements - The framework can be further optimized by expanding the base model library to include more diverse strategies and enhancing market state dimensions with macroeconomic and sentiment indicators [46].