宝盈优势产业混合

Search documents
知名基金经理持续出走,宝盈基金为何留不住猛将?
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-14 13:36
Core Insights - The departure of Yang Siliang from Baoying Fund to Yifangda Fund highlights the ongoing talent migration within the asset management industry, particularly affecting mid-sized firms like Baoying Fund [1][2] - Baoying Fund, known as the "Huangpu Military Academy" of public funds, has produced numerous successful fund managers over the years, but faces challenges in retaining talent due to competitive pressures from larger firms [1][3] Talent Migration - Yang Siliang joined Baoying Fund in April 2015 and became a prominent fund manager, achieving significant returns on multiple funds, including a 156.84% return on Baoying Consumer Theme Fund [2] - His exit is part of a broader trend where Baoying Fund has seen 17 fund managers leave since 2019, with many moving to leading firms, indicating a systemic issue in talent retention [5][6] Internal Challenges - Baoying Fund's internal mechanisms, particularly its incentive structures, are cited as key factors contributing to talent loss, with reports suggesting inadequate compensation for high-performing managers [4][7] - The firm has struggled with a "cultivation-loss" cycle, where talented individuals are developed but subsequently leave for better opportunities [4][5] Management Scale and Performance - Baoying Fund's management scale has fluctuated significantly, peaking at nearly 800 billion yuan shortly after its establishment but dropping to around 732.93 billion yuan by mid-2025, reflecting the impact of talent loss on its operational capacity [6][8] - The firm’s ranking has also declined, falling to 73rd in the industry, contrasting sharply with the rapid growth of larger competitors [6][9] Industry Context - The asset management industry is experiencing a "Matthew Effect," where larger firms are increasingly dominating the market, making it difficult for mid-sized firms like Baoying Fund to compete for talent and resources [9][10] - The rise of alternative investment firms has diversified career options for fund managers, further complicating retention efforts for mid-sized public funds [9][10] Potential Solutions - Some firms are exploring innovative strategies to retain talent, such as implementing profit-sharing models and enhancing team autonomy, which could serve as a model for Baoying Fund and similar companies [10] - Focusing on niche markets or specialized investment strategies may also help mid-sized firms attract and retain talent by creating unique value propositions [10]
知名基金经理持续出走 宝盈基金为什么留不住猛将?
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-12 02:37
Core Viewpoint - The recent departure of Yang Siliang, a prominent fund manager from Baoying Fund, to Yifangda Fund highlights the ongoing talent migration within the asset management industry, raising concerns about Baoying Fund's ability to retain its skilled professionals amidst increasing competition from larger firms [1][5][17]. Group 1: Talent Movement - Yang Siliang left Baoying Fund in late August and joined Yifangda Fund, marking a significant shift in the competitive landscape of fund management [1][3]. - Baoying Fund, known as the "Huangpu Military Academy" of Shenzhen public funds, has seen many of its talented managers, including Yang, move to other firms, reflecting a broader trend of talent outflow in the industry [1][6][18]. - From 2019 to September 2023, Baoying Fund experienced the departure of 17 fund managers, with 70% having over five years of experience, indicating a systemic issue in talent retention [7][14]. Group 2: Performance and Impact - Yang Siliang was recognized for his strong performance, managing over 10 billion yuan in assets and achieving notable returns on his funds, such as a 156.84% return on Baoying Consumer Theme Fund [4][5]. - The loss of high-performing managers like Yang is a significant setback for Baoying Fund, which has historically produced many successful fund managers [5][11]. - Baoying Fund's management scale has fluctuated, dropping from nearly 800 billion yuan to around 732.93 billion yuan, reflecting the impact of talent loss on its overall performance [11][14]. Group 3: Internal Challenges - Baoying Fund's internal mechanisms, including insufficient incentive structures and limited resources, contribute to its challenges in retaining talent [16][17]. - The firm has struggled with a talent gap, as half of its current fund managers have less than three years of experience, raising concerns about the continuity of its investment strategies [14][15]. - The disparity in compensation and resources between Baoying Fund and larger firms exacerbates the difficulty in retaining skilled professionals [16][17]. Group 4: Industry Trends - The asset management industry is experiencing a "Matthew Effect," where larger firms are increasingly dominating the market, making it difficult for smaller firms like Baoying Fund to compete for talent [17][18]. - The trend of talent migration is further fueled by the emergence of private equity and other financial institutions, which offer more attractive career opportunities for fund managers [17][18]. - The competition for talent in the public fund industry is intensifying, with larger firms focusing on team building rather than individual star managers, creating a challenging environment for smaller firms [18].
杨思亮离任宝盈基金旗下3只混基 年内均亏损
Zhong Guo Jing Ji Wang· 2025-08-04 07:52
Group 1 - Yang Siliang has resigned from multiple funds managed by Baoying Fund, including Baoying Quality Selection Mixed, Baoying New Value Mixed, and Baoying Advantage Industry Mixed [1][2][3] - The new fund managers appointed to replace Yang Siliang are Lü Gongji for Baoying Quality Selection Mixed, Zhang Ge for Baoying New Value Mixed, and Yao Yi for Baoying Advantage Industry Mixed [3] - Baoying Quality Selection Mixed A/C has a year-to-date return of -2.73% and -3.15%, and since inception returns of 32.28% and 28.52%, with cumulative net values of 1.3228 and 1.2852 respectively [1] - Baoying New Value Mixed A has a year-to-date return of -2.40% and since inception return of 365.56%, with a cumulative net value of 3.7820, while the C share has a year-to-date return of -2.84% and since inception return of 96.33%, with a cumulative net value of 2.9410 [1] - Baoying Advantage Industry Mixed A has a year-to-date return of -2.56% and since inception return of 273.82%, with a cumulative net value of 3.4305, while the C share has a year-to-date return of -2.79% and since inception return of 11.78%, with a cumulative net value of 3.2279 [2]
罕见下滑!排名又创新低,宝盈基金能否救赎?
中国基金报· 2025-08-02 14:48
Core Viewpoint - Baoying Fund is facing a significant decline in its asset management scale, with its non-monetary management scale dropping to 44.8 billion yuan, ranking 79th in the industry, marking a new low for the company [2][21][24]. Group 1: Company Performance - Baoying Fund's non-monetary management scale has decreased by 7% compared to the end of the first quarter of 2025 [21]. - The company has been struggling with talent shortages in investment research since 2021, leading to stagnation in scale growth [2][24]. - The fund's ranking has dropped from 52nd at the end of 2020 to 79th in the first half of 2025, a decline of 27 places [24]. Group 2: Management Changes - Recent adjustments in the investment research team include the appointment of younger executives, with Wang Lang taking over as vice president [2][15][16]. - The company has made frequent changes to its fund managers, with seven fund manager changes announced on August 2, 2025 [4][11]. - Senior fund manager Yang Silang has stepped down from managing four funds, reducing his managed products from seven to three [4][11]. Group 3: Talent and Strategy - Baoying Fund currently has only 18 fund managers, with a limited number capable of managing equity funds effectively [24]. - The company has seen the departure of several notable equity fund managers in recent years, impacting its talent pool [24][25]. - The new management team, including Wang Lang and other younger managers, aims to address the company's growth challenges and improve its market position [25].