"民营救护车800公里收费2.8万元"事件引发社会关注后，当事人在6月18日已将多收的 17328元款项退还给患者唐某某。 针对医院在其公示标价之外加价收取救护车转运费的行为，南昌市市场监管局依据《中华人 民共和国价格法》第四十二条："经营者违反明码标价规定的，责令改正，没收违法所得，可 以并处五千元以下的罚款"的规定，责令涉事医院改正违法行为，并对其作出罚款5000元的 行政处罚。 来源：央视新闻客户端 此外，针对涉事医院在其他医疗服务过程中存在的超标准收费、重复收费、使用超过有效期 药品等行为，市场监管部门已没收过期药品，对多项违法行为总共罚没87220.86元并上缴国 库。 江西省市场监督管理部门消息，南昌市市场监督管理局近日对"天价救护车"事件中涉事的南 昌赣医医院有限公司作出罚款五千元的行政处罚。 les & FR 点击下载中国基金报客户端 处罚决定书显示，2025年4月8日晚10时左右，南昌赣医医院有限公司员工熊宗勇驾驶挂靠于 该医院的救护车，以该医院名义私自转运江西省儿童医院患者唐某某至上海市内医院急诊， 全程往返路程为1600公里，转运业务收取该患者转运费28000元。南昌赣医医院有限公 司" ...

江西省市场监督管理部门消息，南昌市市场监督管理局近日对"天价救护车"事件中涉事的南昌赣医医院有限公司作出罚款五千元的行政处罚。 此前，江西新余一名家长反映称，今年4月将患重症的孩子从江西省儿童医院转至上海治疗时，800公里的路程被"民营救护车"收取了28000元转运费，"转 运费是直接转到司机的个人账户，且无费用明细及发票"，引发广泛关注。 每经编辑｜许绍航 针对医院在其公示标价之外加价收取救护车转运费的行为，南昌市市场监管局依据《中华人民共和国价格法》第四十二条："经营者违反明码标价规定 的，责令改正，没收违法所得，可以并处五千元以下的罚款"的规定，责令涉事医院改正违法行为，并对其作出罚款5000元的行政处罚。 此外，针对涉事医院在其他医疗服务过程中存在的超标准收费、重复收费、使用超过有效期药品等行为，市场监管部门已没收过期药品，对多项违法行为 总共罚没87220.86元并上缴国库。 编辑|许绍航 杜恒峰 校对|段炼 封面图片来源：九派新闻 本文综合自央视新闻、九派新闻 图据九派新闻 处罚决定书披露了事件经过：2025年4月8日晚10时左右，南昌赣医医院有限公司员工熊宗勇驾驶挂靠于该医院的救护车，以该医院名 ...

此外，针对涉事医院在其他医疗服务过程中存在的超标准收费、重复收费、使用超过有效期药 品等行为，市场监管部门已没收过期药品，对多项违法行为总共罚没87220.86元并上缴国库。 来源丨新华社 "民营救护车800公里收费2.8万元"事件引发社会关注后，当事人在6月18日已将多收的17328元 款项退还给患者唐某某。 针对医院在其公示标价之外加价收取救护车转运费的行为，南昌市市场监管局依据《中华人民 共和国价格法》第四十二条："经营者违反明码标价规定的，责令改正，没收违法所得，可以 并处五千元以下的罚款"的规定，责令涉事医院改正违法行为，并对其作出罚款5000元的行政 处罚。 新华社记者16日从江西省市场监督管理部门获悉，南昌市市场监督管理局近日对"天价救护 车"事件中涉事的南昌赣医医院有限公司作出罚款五千元的行政处罚。 处罚决定书显示，2025年4月8日晚10时左右，南昌赣医医院有限公司员工熊宗勇驾驶挂靠于 该医院的救护车，以该医院名义私自转运江西省儿童医院患者唐某某至上海市内医院急诊，全 程往返路程为1600公里，转运业务收取该患者转运费28000元。南昌赣医医院有限公司"救护 车费"公示收费标准为"20元/3 ...

此外，针对涉事医院在其他医疗服务过程中存在的超标准收费、重复收费、使用超过有效期药品等行为， 市场监管部门已没收过期药品， 对多项违法行为总共罚没87220.86元并上缴国库。 据此前报道，今年6月16日，江西新余的唐先生向媒体反映，4月他将患重症的孩子从江西省儿童医院转 至上海治疗时，800公里的路程被"民营救护车"收取了28000元转运费，转运费是直接转到司机的个人账 户，且无费用明细及发票。 6月18日晚，江西省卫生健康委员会通报初步调查情况： 患儿唐某某于2025年4月4日20时26分因病入江西省儿童医院心脏重症监护室紧急救治。因病情危重，4 月8日19时20分许家属提出急需连夜转运治疗。由于就诊医院无符合跨省转运条件的救护车，经家属请 求，诊治医生联系了赣医医院救护车。救护车司机与家属沟通，约定转运费2.8万元，分两次支付。江西 省儿童医院派出两名医护人员随车护送，并携带使用ECMO（体外膜肺氧合）等相关抢救设备和药品。4 月9日5时许，救护车到达家属指定的上海某医院紧急救治，患儿转危为安。 调查发现， 救护车所有方南昌赣医医院存在收费不合理等问题。 卫生健康行政部门已责令其退回了不合 理收费，并暂 ...

据新华社，记者12月16日从江西省市场监督管理部门获悉，南昌市市场监督管理局近日对"天价救护车"事件中涉事的南昌 赣医医院有限公司作出罚款五千元的行政处罚。 处罚决定书显示，2025年4月8日晚10时左右，南昌赣医医院有限公司员工熊宗勇驾驶挂靠于该医院的救护车，以该医院名 义私自转运江西省儿童医院患者唐某某至上海市内医院急诊，全程往返路程为1600公里，转运业务收取该患者转运费28000 元。南昌赣医医院有限公司"救护车费"公示收费标准为"20元/3公里"，即每公里为6.67元，南昌市至上海市转运救护业务来 回路程共计1600公里，按照公示标价计算，应收10672元。因该医院未对案涉救护车及熊宗勇进行有效管理，致使该医院工 作人员驾驶救护车转运服务中，在"救护车费"公示标价外加收价款17328元。 针对医院在其公示标价之外加价收取救护车转运费的行为，南昌市市场监管局依据《中华人民共和国价格法》第四十二 条："经营者违反明码标价规定的，责令改正，没收违法所得，可以并处五千元以下的罚款"的规定，责令涉事医院改正违 法行为，并对其作出罚款5000元的行政处罚。 此外，针对涉事医院在其他医疗服务过程中存在的超标准收费 ...

此外，针对涉事医院在其他医疗服务过程中存在的超标准收费、重复收费、使用超过有效期药品等行 为，市场监管部门已没收过期药品，对多项违法行为总共罚没87220.86元并上缴国库。 来源｜ 新华社 "民营救护车800公里收费2.8万元"事件引发社会关注后，当事人在6月18日已将多收的17328元款项退 还给患者唐某某。 针对医院在其公示标价之外加价收取救护车转运费的行为，南昌市市场监管局依据《中华人民共和国价 格法》第四十二条："经营者违反明码标价规定的，责令改正，没收违法所得，可以并处五千元以下的 罚款"的规定，责令涉事医院改正违法行为，并对其作出罚款5000元的行政处罚。 记者16日从江西省市场监督管理部门获悉，南昌市市场监督管理局近日对"天价救护车"事件中涉事的 南昌赣医医院有限公司作出罚款五千元的行政处罚。 处罚决定书显示，2025年4月8日晚10时左右，南昌赣医医院有限公司员工熊宗勇驾驶挂靠于该医院的 救护车，以该医院名义私自转运江西省儿童医院患者唐某某至上海市内医院急诊，全程往返路程为 1600公里，转运业务收取该患者转运费28000元。南昌赣医医院有限公司"救护车费"公示收费标准 为"20元/3公里" ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the improvements in emergency medical services in China, particularly in pre-hospital emergency care and the challenges faced in long-distance medical transport [2][4][9]. Group 1: Emergency Medical Services Improvement - The average response time for emergency medical services in Kunming, Yunnan, has decreased from 17 minutes in 2020 to 12 minutes currently, showcasing enhanced efficiency [2]. - The establishment of a unified emergency command and dispatch cloud platform in Yunnan has facilitated better communication and coordination, significantly improving emergency response times [2][8]. - In Nanjing, the emergency medical system operates under a model that emphasizes unified planning and dispatch, which has also led to improved efficiency in emergency responses [3]. Group 2: Long-Distance Medical Transport Challenges - There is a notable shortage of long-distance medical transport services, particularly for patients requiring cross-province transfers, leading to delays in critical care [4][5]. - Many regions lack the capability to provide cross-province emergency transport, forcing patients to rely on private services that may not meet safety standards [5][9]. - The need for non-emergency medical transport services is also increasing, as patients often require professional medical escort during transfers or discharges [6]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest the establishment of standardized protocols for long-distance medical transport, including vehicle and personnel qualifications, as well as transparent pricing [9][10]. - There is a call for the integration of non-emergency transport services with existing emergency systems to enhance overall service quality and efficiency [9]. - Recommendations include the creation of a cross-regional oxygen supply support system and the standardization of oxygen interfaces to address the challenges faced during long-distance patient transfers [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the improvements in emergency medical services in China, particularly in pre-hospital emergency care, while also addressing the challenges faced in long-distance medical transport services. Group 1: Emergency Medical Services Improvement - The establishment of a unified emergency command and dispatch cloud platform in Yunnan has significantly reduced the average emergency response time from 17 minutes in 2020 to 12 minutes currently [2] - In Nanjing, the emergency center has implemented a model of "independent pre-hospital medical emergency," which includes unified planning and dispatch, enhancing overall emergency response efficiency [3] - The integration of emergency services with local traffic authorities has facilitated quicker transport of patients, as demonstrated by a case where a heart patient was transferred in just 13 minutes during peak traffic [3] Group 2: Long-Distance Medical Transport Challenges - There is a notable shortage of long-distance medical transport services, particularly for patients requiring interprovincial transfers, leading to delays in critical care [4][5] - Many regions lack the capability to provide cross-province transport, forcing medical professionals to resort to private transport options, which may not meet safety standards [4][5] - The need for non-emergency medical transport services is also growing, as patients may require assistance during transfers or after discharge [6] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest the establishment of standardized protocols for long-distance medical transport, including vehicle and personnel qualifications, as well as transparent pricing [9] - There is a call for the integration of non-emergency transport services with existing emergency systems to improve efficiency and meet rising public demand [9] - Recommendations include creating a cross-regional oxygen supply support system and standardizing oxygen interfaces to address the challenges faced during long-distance patient transfers [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the urgent need to improve the non-emergency medical transport service system in China, especially in light of increasing diverse and personalized medical needs [1][4]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - A father in Jiangxi complained about a charge of 28,000 yuan for an 800-kilometer transfer of his critically ill child, leading to an investigation by the Jiangxi Health Commission [2]. - The child was in a critical condition and required urgent transfer, which was facilitated by a private hospital's ambulance due to the lack of suitable vehicles from the original hospital [2][3]. Public Reaction - The incident sparked significant public debate, with some arguing that the fee was exorbitant and questioning potential kickback practices, while others defended the cost given the emergency nature of the transfer and the use of advanced medical equipment like ECMO [2][3]. - The Health Commission's response was criticized for not providing clear details on what constituted unreasonable charges and the basis for reasonable pricing [3]. Systemic Issues - The article points out that public ambulances in China rarely handle inter-provincial transfers due to regulatory and resource allocation issues, with emergency services primarily focused on local needs [3][4]. - The current system's limitations were highlighted, as the urgent nature of the child's condition did not fit neatly into existing categories of emergency and non-emergency transport [4]. Regulatory Recommendations - There is a call for the government to enhance regulation and oversight of the medical transport sector to eliminate gray areas, as evidenced by the family's payment directly to the driver's personal account without any receipts [4]. - The article emphasizes the need for a standardized non-emergency transport service system, with clear responsibilities, processes, and transparent pricing to address the growing demand for such services [4].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the high charge of 28,000 yuan for an 800-kilometer ambulance transfer has sparked significant public debate regarding the reasonableness of such fees and the regulatory framework surrounding medical transport services [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A father in Jiangxi complained about the 28,000 yuan charge for transferring his critically ill child over 800 kilometers, leading to an investigation by the Jiangxi Health Commission [1]. - The child was in urgent need of transfer due to a severe condition, and the ambulance service was provided by Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital, which was found to have unreasonable charges [1][3]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Concerns - Public opinion is divided; some view the fee as exorbitant and suspect potential kickbacks, while others argue that the service provided was akin to a mobile ICU, justifying the cost [2]. - The Jiangxi Health Commission's announcement did not clarify the specific issues with the charges or provide a reasonable fee standard, leaving many questions unanswered [2]. Group 3: Systemic Issues in Medical Transport - The lack of ambulances meeting cross-province transfer conditions at the treating hospital raises concerns about the medical transport system's shortcomings [3]. - The current system in China separates emergency and non-emergency transport, with public ambulances primarily serving local needs, which limits their availability for long-distance transfers [3][4]. Group 4: Regulatory and Market Considerations - The incident highlights the need for improved regulation and oversight in the non-emergency transport sector, especially as demand for such services grows [4]. - The introduction of market forces in areas where public resources are insufficient is necessary, but the government must enhance regulation to eliminate gray areas in service provision [4].