Workflow
救护车转运服务
icon
Search documents
“天价救护车”事件涉事医院被罚款五千元
中国基金报· 2025-12-16 12:23
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the administrative penalty imposed on Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital for overcharging a patient for ambulance services, highlighting issues of price regulation and compliance in the healthcare sector [2][3]. Group 1: Incident Details - On April 8, 2025, an employee of Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital charged a patient 28,000 yuan for a 1,600-kilometer ambulance transfer, while the hospital's public pricing standard indicated a charge of 20 yuan per 3 kilometers, totaling 10,672 yuan for the same service [2]. - The hospital's employee collected an additional 17,328 yuan beyond the public pricing standard, leading to significant public outcry and scrutiny [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Nanchang Market Supervision Administration fined the hospital 5,000 yuan for violating pricing regulations as per Article 42 of the Price Law of the People's Republic of China, which mandates clear pricing and prohibits overcharging [3]. - In addition to the fine for the ambulance incident, the hospital faced further penalties totaling 87,220.86 yuan for other violations, including excessive charges and the use of expired medications [3].
来回1600公里,收取28000元转运费,“天价救护车”事件涉事医院被罚5000元
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-16 10:41
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the "expensive ambulance" service in Nanchang has led to a fine of 5,000 yuan imposed on Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital Co., Ltd. for overcharging a patient during an ambulance transfer [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Details - A parent reported that in April 2025, a private ambulance charged 28,000 yuan for transporting their critically ill child from Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital to a hospital in Shanghai, covering a distance of 800 kilometers [1][3]. - The ambulance service was operated by an employee of Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital, who charged the patient 28,000 yuan for a round trip of 1,600 kilometers, while the hospital's publicly listed rate was 20 yuan per 3 kilometers, totaling only 10,672 yuan based on the official pricing [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - Following public concern, the hospital refunded the excess charge of 17,328 yuan to the patient on June 18 [4]. - The Nanchang Market Supervision Administration fined the hospital 5,000 yuan for violating pricing regulations and ordered the hospital to correct its pricing practices [4]. - The regulatory body also confiscated expired medications and imposed a total penalty of 87,220.86 yuan for various other violations, including overcharging and using expired drugs [4].
“天价救护车”事件涉事医院被罚款五千元
21世纪经济报道· 2025-12-16 09:28
Group 1 - The Nanchang Ganyi Hospital was fined 5,000 yuan for overcharging a patient for ambulance services, charging 28,000 yuan instead of the standard 10,672 yuan based on their public pricing [1][2] - The incident involved a 1,600-kilometer round trip for patient transport, with the hospital's public rate being 20 yuan per 3 kilometers, equating to 6.67 yuan per kilometer [1] - Following public outcry, the hospital refunded the excess charge of 17,328 yuan to the patient [1] Group 2 - The Nanchang Market Supervision Administration mandated the hospital to correct its pricing violations and imposed a fine based on the Price Law of the People's Republic of China [2] - The hospital was also found to have engaged in other illegal practices, including overcharging and using expired medications, leading to a total confiscation of 87,220.86 yuan [2]
“天价救护车”事件,处罚结果来了
券商中国· 2025-12-16 09:21
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the administrative penalty imposed on Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital for overcharging a patient for ambulance services, highlighting issues of price regulation and patient rights in the healthcare sector [1][2][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On April 8, 2025, an employee of Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital charged a patient 28,000 yuan for a 1,600-kilometer ambulance transfer, while the official rate should have been 10,672 yuan based on the hospital's published pricing [1]. - The hospital was fined 5,000 yuan for violating pricing regulations and was ordered to correct its pricing practices [2]. - The hospital refunded the excess charge of 17,328 yuan to the patient after the incident gained public attention [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Nanchang Market Supervision Administration took action based on the violation of the Price Law, which mandates clear pricing and prohibits overcharging [2]. - In addition to the ambulance incident, the hospital faced penalties for other violations, including overcharging and using expired medications, totaling 87,220.86 yuan in fines and confiscated illegal gains [2]. - The Jiangxi Provincial Health Commission is conducting further investigations into the hospital's practices and has suspended its medical transport services pending the outcome [3].
800公里收2.8万元!“天价救护车”事件处理结果公布:涉事医院被罚款5000元 已将多收的1.73万元退还给患者
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-16 09:05
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the "sky-high ambulance fees" at Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital has led to a fine of 5,000 yuan due to unreasonable charges for patient transport services [1][2][3] Group 1: Incident Details - On April 8, 2025, an employee of Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital charged a patient 28,000 yuan for a 1,600-kilometer ambulance transport from Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital to a hospital in Shanghai, while the hospital's public fee standard was 20 yuan per 3 kilometers, totaling 10,672 yuan for the trip [1] - The hospital failed to effectively manage the ambulance and its employee, resulting in an additional charge of 17,328 yuan beyond the publicized fee [1][2] Group 2: Regulatory Actions - Following public concern, the Nanchang Market Supervision Administration imposed a fine of 5,000 yuan on the hospital for violating pricing regulations and ordered it to rectify its pricing practices [2] - The hospital was also found to have engaged in other illegal practices, including overcharging and using expired medications, leading to a total confiscation of 87,220.86 yuan [2][3] Group 3: Patient Experience - The patient’s family reported that the ambulance fee was paid directly to the driver’s personal account without a detailed invoice, raising questions about the legitimacy of the charges [2] - The patient, who was in critical condition, was successfully transported to a Shanghai hospital for urgent treatment, with medical personnel accompanying the transport [3]
“天价救护车”事件,处罚结果来了
第一财经· 2025-12-16 09:03
Group 1 - The Nanchang Ganyi Hospital was fined 5,000 yuan for overcharging a patient for ambulance services, charging 28,000 yuan instead of the standard 10,672 yuan based on public pricing [1][2] - The incident involved a 1,600-kilometer round trip for patient transport, where the hospital's public rate was 20 yuan per 3 kilometers, equating to 6.67 yuan per kilometer [1] - Following public attention on the "expensive ambulance" incident, the hospital refunded the excess charge of 17,328 yuan to the patient [1] Group 2 - The Nanchang Market Supervision Administration mandated the hospital to correct its pricing violations and imposed a fine based on the Price Law of the People's Republic of China [2] - The hospital was also found to have engaged in other illegal practices, including overcharging and using expired medications, leading to a total confiscation of 87,220.86 yuan [2]
长途医疗转运服务有待完善
Core Insights - The article highlights the improvements in emergency medical services in China, particularly in pre-hospital emergency care and the challenges faced in long-distance medical transport [2][4][9]. Group 1: Emergency Medical Services Improvement - The average response time for emergency medical services in Kunming, Yunnan, has decreased from 17 minutes in 2020 to 12 minutes currently, showcasing enhanced efficiency [2]. - The establishment of a unified emergency command and dispatch cloud platform in Yunnan has facilitated better communication and coordination, significantly improving emergency response times [2][8]. - In Nanjing, the emergency medical system operates under a model that emphasizes unified planning and dispatch, which has also led to improved efficiency in emergency responses [3]. Group 2: Long-Distance Medical Transport Challenges - There is a notable shortage of long-distance medical transport services, particularly for patients requiring cross-province transfers, leading to delays in critical care [4][5]. - Many regions lack the capability to provide cross-province emergency transport, forcing patients to rely on private services that may not meet safety standards [5][9]. - The need for non-emergency medical transport services is also increasing, as patients often require professional medical escort during transfers or discharges [6]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest the establishment of standardized protocols for long-distance medical transport, including vehicle and personnel qualifications, as well as transparent pricing [9][10]. - There is a call for the integration of non-emergency transport services with existing emergency systems to enhance overall service quality and efficiency [9]. - Recommendations include the creation of a cross-regional oxygen supply support system and the standardization of oxygen interfaces to address the challenges faced during long-distance patient transfers [10].
“120”不出省?救护车半路加价?面对众多问题——长途医疗转运服务有待完善
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-17 00:16
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the improvements in emergency medical services in China, particularly in pre-hospital emergency care, while also addressing the challenges faced in long-distance medical transport services. Group 1: Emergency Medical Services Improvement - The establishment of a unified emergency command and dispatch cloud platform in Yunnan has significantly reduced the average emergency response time from 17 minutes in 2020 to 12 minutes currently [2] - In Nanjing, the emergency center has implemented a model of "independent pre-hospital medical emergency," which includes unified planning and dispatch, enhancing overall emergency response efficiency [3] - The integration of emergency services with local traffic authorities has facilitated quicker transport of patients, as demonstrated by a case where a heart patient was transferred in just 13 minutes during peak traffic [3] Group 2: Long-Distance Medical Transport Challenges - There is a notable shortage of long-distance medical transport services, particularly for patients requiring interprovincial transfers, leading to delays in critical care [4][5] - Many regions lack the capability to provide cross-province transport, forcing medical professionals to resort to private transport options, which may not meet safety standards [4][5] - The need for non-emergency medical transport services is also growing, as patients may require assistance during transfers or after discharge [6] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest the establishment of standardized protocols for long-distance medical transport, including vehicle and personnel qualifications, as well as transparent pricing [9] - There is a call for the integration of non-emergency transport services with existing emergency systems to improve efficiency and meet rising public demand [9] - Recommendations include creating a cross-regional oxygen supply support system and standardizing oxygen interfaces to address the challenges faced during long-distance patient transfers [10]
救护车收费2.8万 江西通报未解公众关切
经济观察报· 2025-06-19 08:36
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the urgent need to improve the non-emergency medical transport service system in China, especially in light of increasing diverse and personalized medical needs [1][4]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - A father in Jiangxi complained about a charge of 28,000 yuan for an 800-kilometer transfer of his critically ill child, leading to an investigation by the Jiangxi Health Commission [2]. - The child was in a critical condition and required urgent transfer, which was facilitated by a private hospital's ambulance due to the lack of suitable vehicles from the original hospital [2][3]. Public Reaction - The incident sparked significant public debate, with some arguing that the fee was exorbitant and questioning potential kickback practices, while others defended the cost given the emergency nature of the transfer and the use of advanced medical equipment like ECMO [2][3]. - The Health Commission's response was criticized for not providing clear details on what constituted unreasonable charges and the basis for reasonable pricing [3]. Systemic Issues - The article points out that public ambulances in China rarely handle inter-provincial transfers due to regulatory and resource allocation issues, with emergency services primarily focused on local needs [3][4]. - The current system's limitations were highlighted, as the urgent nature of the child's condition did not fit neatly into existing categories of emergency and non-emergency transport [4]. Regulatory Recommendations - There is a call for the government to enhance regulation and oversight of the medical transport sector to eliminate gray areas, as evidenced by the family's payment directly to the driver's personal account without any receipts [4]. - The article emphasizes the need for a standardized non-emergency transport service system, with clear responsibilities, processes, and transparent pricing to address the growing demand for such services [4].
救护车收费2.8万 江西通报未解公众关切
Jing Ji Guan Cha Bao· 2025-06-19 08:30
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the high charge of 28,000 yuan for an 800-kilometer ambulance transfer has sparked significant public debate regarding the reasonableness of such fees and the regulatory framework surrounding medical transport services [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A father in Jiangxi complained about the 28,000 yuan charge for transferring his critically ill child over 800 kilometers, leading to an investigation by the Jiangxi Health Commission [1]. - The child was in urgent need of transfer due to a severe condition, and the ambulance service was provided by Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital, which was found to have unreasonable charges [1][3]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Concerns - Public opinion is divided; some view the fee as exorbitant and suspect potential kickbacks, while others argue that the service provided was akin to a mobile ICU, justifying the cost [2]. - The Jiangxi Health Commission's announcement did not clarify the specific issues with the charges or provide a reasonable fee standard, leaving many questions unanswered [2]. Group 3: Systemic Issues in Medical Transport - The lack of ambulances meeting cross-province transfer conditions at the treating hospital raises concerns about the medical transport system's shortcomings [3]. - The current system in China separates emergency and non-emergency transport, with public ambulances primarily serving local needs, which limits their availability for long-distance transfers [3][4]. Group 4: Regulatory and Market Considerations - The incident highlights the need for improved regulation and oversight in the non-emergency transport sector, especially as demand for such services grows [4]. - The introduction of market forces in areas where public resources are insufficient is necessary, but the government must enhance regulation to eliminate gray areas in service provision [4].