近日，广东省发布"十五五"规划建议，明确要"做强医疗器械等优势产业"，"推动生物制造、脑机接口 等成为新的经济增长点"。 "十四五"期间，我国医疗装备产业实现跨越式发展，年复合增长率约10.7%。在技术攻坚与政策支持的 双重助力下，高端医疗器械从"跟跑"向"并跑" 加速迈进，部分领域实现"领跑"突破。 这一成果的背后，有一家关键机构为推动中国医疗器械产业高质创新发挥了重要作用，这家机构便是 2020年4月经工业和信息化部批复成立的国家高性能医疗器械创新中心（以下简称"国创中心"），其也 是全国医疗器械领域唯一的国家级制造业创新中心。 该中心为由龙头企业、高校、科研院所组成的"攻关+创新+转化"联合体，近年来不仅携全球首台5.0T人 体全身磁共振、国产首台ECMO等跻身国际第一梯队的创新装备，实现了系列关键技术突破，更为国内 培育了一批前沿创新医疗（002173）器械企业。 "医疗器械涉及多学科交叉，技术复杂度高，让中小企业独立掌控全链条技术与资源，不仅负担沉重， 创新效率也极低。国创中心的核心价值之一，就是打造'技术创新与转化的热带雨林生态'，为企业提供 公共技术支撑，解决临床验证、标准制定、安全评估等共性问 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the urgent need to improve the non-emergency medical transport service system in China, especially in light of increasing diverse and personalized medical needs [1][4]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - A father in Jiangxi complained about a charge of 28,000 yuan for an 800-kilometer transfer of his critically ill child, leading to an investigation by the Jiangxi Health Commission [2]. - The child was in a critical condition and required urgent transfer, which was facilitated by a private hospital's ambulance due to the lack of suitable vehicles from the original hospital [2][3]. Public Reaction - The incident sparked significant public debate, with some arguing that the fee was exorbitant and questioning potential kickback practices, while others defended the cost given the emergency nature of the transfer and the use of advanced medical equipment like ECMO [2][3]. - The Health Commission's response was criticized for not providing clear details on what constituted unreasonable charges and the basis for reasonable pricing [3]. Systemic Issues - The article points out that public ambulances in China rarely handle inter-provincial transfers due to regulatory and resource allocation issues, with emergency services primarily focused on local needs [3][4]. - The current system's limitations were highlighted, as the urgent nature of the child's condition did not fit neatly into existing categories of emergency and non-emergency transport [4]. Regulatory Recommendations - There is a call for the government to enhance regulation and oversight of the medical transport sector to eliminate gray areas, as evidenced by the family's payment directly to the driver's personal account without any receipts [4]. - The article emphasizes the need for a standardized non-emergency transport service system, with clear responsibilities, processes, and transparent pricing to address the growing demand for such services [4].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the high charge of 28,000 yuan for an 800-kilometer ambulance transfer has sparked significant public debate regarding the reasonableness of such fees and the regulatory framework surrounding medical transport services [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A father in Jiangxi complained about the 28,000 yuan charge for transferring his critically ill child over 800 kilometers, leading to an investigation by the Jiangxi Health Commission [1]. - The child was in urgent need of transfer due to a severe condition, and the ambulance service was provided by Nanchang Gan Medical Hospital, which was found to have unreasonable charges [1][3]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Concerns - Public opinion is divided; some view the fee as exorbitant and suspect potential kickbacks, while others argue that the service provided was akin to a mobile ICU, justifying the cost [2]. - The Jiangxi Health Commission's announcement did not clarify the specific issues with the charges or provide a reasonable fee standard, leaving many questions unanswered [2]. Group 3: Systemic Issues in Medical Transport - The lack of ambulances meeting cross-province transfer conditions at the treating hospital raises concerns about the medical transport system's shortcomings [3]. - The current system in China separates emergency and non-emergency transport, with public ambulances primarily serving local needs, which limits their availability for long-distance transfers [3][4]. Group 4: Regulatory and Market Considerations - The incident highlights the need for improved regulation and oversight in the non-emergency transport sector, especially as demand for such services grows [4]. - The introduction of market forces in areas where public resources are insufficient is necessary, but the government must enhance regulation to eliminate gray areas in service provision [4].