2025年4月8日，工作人员在成都彭州国家级民用无人机驾驶航空试验基地"天空之眼"试飞一款无人机产 品。 图据新华社客户端 近年来，无人机培训异常火热，不少机构打出"包取证""包就业"等噱头，抢占培训市场。 记者调查发现，无人机培训繁荣景象背后，行业泥沙俱下。无资质办学、虚假承诺等乱象频发，不少人 因此上当受骗。 无人机培训日趋火热 2024年1月1日，《无人驾驶航空器飞行管理暂行条例》施行。持有CAAC无人机执照，成为行业从业准 入门槛；此外，无人机执照也是申报空域、申请航线的必备条件。 无人机考证日趋火热，也为众多培训机构带来商机。 公开数据显示，2024年8月，全国无人机培训机构突破1000家。而据记者在民用无人驾驶航空器综合管 理平台查询，截至今年12月15日，这一数据已迅速攀升至3900多家。天眼查数据则显示，截至12月15 日，今年无人机培训相关企业注册数量已超过15500家；而去年同期，这一数据仅为4200多家。 大量新机构涌入，靠谱吗？ 今年3月，河南的汪先生在短视频平台刷到一则"无人机免费培训"的内容。心动的他报了名，并缴纳了1 万元押金。可培训还没结束，这家培训基地就因为纠纷问题关闭。后经 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rapid growth of drone training programs has led to a surge in unqualified institutions making false promises, resulting in many individuals being deceived [1][4][8]. Group 1: Industry Growth and Trends - The implementation of the "Interim Regulations on the Management of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles" on January 1, 2024, establishes the CAAC drone license as a prerequisite for industry entry and necessary for airspace applications [2]. - As of December 15, 2023, the number of drone training institutions in China has increased to over 3,900, up from just over 1,000 in August 2024, with more than 15,500 related companies registered this year compared to 4,200 last year [3]. Group 2: Issues with Training Institutions - Many new training institutions lack proper qualifications, with some operating without the required "Civil Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Pilot Training Institution Qualification Certificate" [4][8]. - Complaints from students highlight issues such as inadequate practical training, with some reporting that promised real machine operation hours were significantly lower than advertised [5][8]. - The low entry barrier for starting a training institution has led to a proliferation of unqualified providers, often using misleading marketing tactics to attract students [4][9]. Group 3: Financial Concerns and Student Experiences - Students often face unexpected costs beyond initial fees, including charges for accommodation, additional training, and various hidden fees, leading to total expenses exceeding initial estimates [7][8]. - Many institutions advertise "job placement" guarantees, but students frequently find these promises unfulfilled, receiving only temporary or low-quality job offers [8][9]. Group 4: Regulatory and Industry Recommendations - Experts suggest that regulatory bodies need to enhance oversight to eliminate non-compliant institutions and improve market order [9][10]. - Training institutions are encouraged to adopt a segmented fee structure to reduce upfront financial risks for students and to provide practical skills training alongside certification [9][10].

Core Insights - The drone training industry is experiencing rapid growth, with a significant increase in the number of training institutions and registered companies, raising concerns about the quality and legitimacy of these programs [1][2][5] Group 1: Industry Growth and Trends - The implementation of the "Interim Regulations on the Management of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight" on January 1, 2024, establishes a CAAC drone license as a prerequisite for industry entry [1] - As of December 15, 2023, the number of drone training institutions in China has surged to over 3,900, up from just over 1,000 in August 2024, and the number of related companies registered this year exceeds 15,500, compared to over 4,200 in the same period last year [1][2] - The demand for drone pilots is substantial, with a projected talent gap of over one million positions in the industry by the end of 2024, as indicated by the Civil Aviation Administration of China [5] Group 2: Issues and Concerns - Many training institutions lack proper qualifications, with reports of unlicensed operations and false promises regarding job placements and training quality [2][4] - Complaints from students highlight issues such as poor course quality, difficulty in obtaining refunds, and misleading advertising practices [4][5] - The low entry barriers for establishing training institutions have led to a proliferation of unqualified providers, often resulting in inadequate training and high additional costs for students [2][3] Group 3: Recommendations and Regulatory Needs - Industry experts emphasize the need for stricter regulatory oversight to eliminate non-compliant institutions and improve market order [5][6] - It is recommended that students verify the qualifications of training institutions through official platforms before enrolling, to avoid falling victim to scams [6]

Core Insights - The drone training industry is experiencing rapid growth, with over 2,500 training institutions established by June 2023, and a significant increase in enrollment numbers, indicating a new industry trend [1] - The demand for drone operators is driven by a projected talent gap of 1 million positions in China, as low-altitude economy initiatives are included in government work reports for 2024 [1] - Many young individuals are attracted to the industry due to the promise of high salaries and quick certification, leading to a surge in training programs [1] Industry Challenges - Despite the growth in training institutions, many graduates face unemployment, raising questions about the actual job prospects and the quality of training provided [2] - Some training programs misrepresent their employment guarantees, with legal analyses revealing discrepancies between promises and actual job placement support [2] - The quality of training varies significantly, with some institutions prioritizing profit over comprehensive education, potentially leading to safety risks in the field [2] Market Dynamics - The increasing automation and intelligence of drone operations may outpace the current training offerings, leading to a mismatch between skills taught and market needs [3] - A singular focus on flying skills may not suffice in a competitive job market, as specialized knowledge in fields like agriculture or electrical inspections is also required [3] - The rapid growth in job postings for drone-related positions is overshadowed by an even faster increase in job seekers, suggesting a potential talent bubble in the industry [3] Recommendations for Improvement - Regulatory bodies should address misleading employment claims and establish a quality assessment system for training programs to ensure they meet industry standards [3][4] - Training programs should integrate practical applications relevant to various sectors, fostering the development of versatile professionals capable of solving complex problems [4] - Aligning vocational training with industry needs is essential for transforming the burgeoning low-altitude economy into tangible employment opportunities [4]