5月17日，景顺长城基金发布公告，确认旗下百亿级基金经理鲍无可因个人原因离职，并卸任其管理的全部8只基金，包括代表作景顺长城能源基建（任职 回报374.75%，年化15.37%）和景顺长城沪港深精选（任职回报185.82%，年化12.42%）。 鲍无可是业内少有的"双十"基金经理（从业超10年、年化回报超10%），稳健是其鲜明的投资风格。凭借稳健的投资风格，鲍无可一度被基民称为"宝藏 基金经理"。 | 证券名称 | 占净值比 | 较上期 | 近3月涨幅 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 脂訊控股 | 6.93% | 0.34%T | 2.94%1 | | 神火股份 | 5.71% | 1.10%↑ | 1.64%↑ | | 美的集团 | 5.43% | -0.55%1 | 7.21%↑ | | 溫龍領與 | 4.83% | -0.69%1 | -8.64%1 | | 三合矿业 | 4.72% | -4.85%1 | 6.54%1 | | 米全腰半 | 4.53% | 4.53%↑ | 9.61%↑ | | 中國移動 | 2.65% | 2.65%↑ | 6.25%↑ | | 久立特材 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent appointment of four new fund managers at Invesco Great Wall Fund, alongside veteran manager Bao Wuke, has raised speculation about potential changes in management and performance of the funds involved [2][3]. Group 1: Fund Manager Changes - Bao Wuke, a seasoned fund manager with over 17 years of experience, has been managing several funds at Invesco Great Wall Fund, including the Value Margin and Hong Kong-Shanghai Select funds [2]. - The newly appointed fund managers are Liu Su, Zou Lihua, Zhang Zhongwei, and Wang Yong, all of whom are experienced professionals within the company [3][4]. - The "old hands co-managing" model is relatively rare in the fund industry, as the more common practice is "old leads new" for training purposes [3]. Group 2: Fund Performance Post-Appointment - Following the announcement of the new appointments on April 12, three out of four funds have shown an increase in performance [5]. - The net asset value of the Value Margin fund rose from 1.5335 to 1.5425, with major holdings including Zijin Mining and Midea Group [5][6]. - The National Enterprise Value Mixed A fund's net value slightly decreased from 1.2086 to 1.2083, with Zijin Mining being the largest holding at 10.01% of the fund's net asset value [6]. - The Hong Kong-Shanghai Select A fund's net value increased from 2.177 to 2.191, with Midea Group as the top holding at 6.65% [6]. - The Value Discovery A1 fund's net value rose from 1.0927 to 1.1005, with Zijin Mining as the largest holding at 6.04% [6]. Group 3: Management Structure Insights - The effectiveness of co-managing a fund is debated, with some experts suggesting that a single manager may have more independence in decision-making [7]. - However, there are exceptions where a dual-manager structure can enhance performance, particularly in complex products requiring diverse expertise [7].