Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of strict enforcement of laws to protect cultural relics and the need for public awareness in cultural heritage preservation [1][2] - Five typical cases of legal actions taken to promote cultural relic protection are highlighted, showcasing the judiciary's role in safeguarding cultural heritage [1][3] Group 2 - Case one involves the severe punishment of individuals involved in the illegal excavation of ancient tombs, with the court mandating compensation for archaeological excavation costs [7][8] - Case two addresses the intentional damage to cultural relics at Mount Tai, with the court imposing penalties and requiring public apologies from the offenders [10][11] - Case three focuses on a company that unlawfully constructed buildings within the protected area of the Grand Canal, resulting in the court ruling that the company must bear the losses from the demolition of its illegal structures [14][15] Group 3 - Case four discusses the judicial support for the protection and utilization of the Changleyuan Anti-Japanese Industrial Site, which is significant for its historical contributions during the war [18][20] - Case five highlights the protection of the former residence of anti-Japanese hero Ji Hongchang, with the court ensuring the return of the property for public educational use [21][24]