Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China is enhancing judicial protection for technological secrets to promote the standardization and improvement of commercial secret protection mechanisms [1] Group 1: Judicial Protection of Technological Secrets - The Supreme People's Court has accepted 343 cases related to technological secrets since the establishment of the Intellectual Property Court [1] - The "14th Five-Year Plan" emphasizes the importance of strengthening the role of enterprises as technological innovation entities [1] Group 2: Strict Protection and Fair Competition - The court is committed to strict protection of technological secrets, utilizing evidence rules to combat infringement effectively, as seen in notable cases like the "Melamine" and "New Energy Vehicle Chassis" cases [2] - Punitive damages are being enforced to deter infringers, with the "New Energy Vehicle Chassis" case resulting in a judgment of 640 million yuan in punitive damages [2] Group 3: Balancing Interests and Promoting Resolution - The court aims to facilitate substantial resolutions, as demonstrated by the "Nylon Raw Material Process" case, which led to a comprehensive settlement and subsequent cooperation between parties [3] - Future efforts will focus on summarizing judicial experiences, handling significant and complex cases, and advocating for improved commercial secret protection regulations [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court ruled in favor of Beijing Jingdiao Technology Group Co., Ltd. in a case against an ex-employee and a Shenzhen company for infringement of trade secrets, ordering a total compensation of 381.63 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses [1][7]. Group 1: Case Background - Jingdiao Company is a national high-tech enterprise specializing in the research and manufacturing of CNC machine tools, possessing 37,340 design drawings and related technical documents as trade secrets [2]. - The ex-employee, Tian, illegally copied these trade secrets before joining Shenzhen Company, where he used them to design and sell infringing products [2]. - By the end of 2018, Shenzhen Company had sold 371 infringing glass machines, continuing to produce and sell various infringing products in subsequent years [2]. Group 2: Legal Focus - The court determined that the 2019 revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law applies to this case, as the infringing activities continued after the law's revision [3]. - The court recognized the technical information claimed by Jingdiao Company as trade secrets due to its systematic nature, economic value, and the company's reasonable measures to maintain confidentiality [4][5]. - The court found that both Tian and Shenzhen Company constituted joint infringement, as Tian was the source of the trade secrets and Shenzhen Company knowingly used them [6]. Group 3: Judgment Outcome - The Supreme Court ordered Tian and Shenzhen Company to cease any disclosure or use of the trade secrets and to destroy all related documents within 30 days [7][19]. - They were also ordered to pay Jingdiao Company 379.63 million yuan for economic losses and 2 million yuan for reasonable expenses, totaling 381.63 million yuan [7][20]. - The judgment emphasized that failure to comply with the ruling would result in significant penalties for delayed performance [20].