Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China is enhancing judicial protection for technological secrets to promote the standardization and improvement of commercial secret protection mechanisms [1] Group 1: Judicial Protection of Technological Secrets - The Supreme People's Court has accepted 343 cases related to technological secrets since the establishment of the Intellectual Property Court [1] - The "14th Five-Year Plan" emphasizes the importance of strengthening the role of enterprises as technological innovation entities [1] Group 2: Strict Protection and Fair Competition - The court is committed to strict protection of technological secrets, utilizing evidence rules to combat infringement effectively, as seen in notable cases like the "Melamine" and "New Energy Vehicle Chassis" cases [2] - Punitive damages are being enforced to deter infringers, with the "New Energy Vehicle Chassis" case resulting in a judgment of 640 million yuan in punitive damages [2] Group 3: Balancing Interests and Promoting Resolution - The court aims to facilitate substantial resolutions, as demonstrated by the "Nylon Raw Material Process" case, which led to a comprehensive settlement and subsequent cooperation between parties [3] - Future efforts will focus on summarizing judicial experiences, handling significant and complex cases, and advocating for improved commercial secret protection regulations [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China has released eight typical cases of unfair competition, emphasizing the importance of strict protection of fair competition order, punishing unfair practices like "free-riding" on well-known brands, and guiding the healthy development of new business models and technologies [1][2][3]. Group 1: Strict Protection of Fair Competition - Unfair competition harms the legitimate rights of other operators and consumers, distorting the market competition mechanism [1]. - The court has imposed punitive damages in cases such as the "centrifugal compressor selection" software and technical secret infringement case, where the defendants were ordered to pay over 166 million yuan for their actions [1][2]. - The "natural protein enzyme 3" case explored cross-border judicial protection of trade secrets, ensuring fair protection for foreign rights holders [1][2]. Group 2: Punishment of Unfair Competition Behaviors - The "certain cow" trademark dispute clarified that registering a similar name to a well-known brand constitutes illegal imitation, even if not yet in use [2]. - The "car maintenance service" case accurately identified and punished misleading information that damages competitors' reputations [2]. - The "moving software" case recognized the illegal scraping of vast amounts of product data as unfair competition, protecting the rights of honest operators [2]. Group 3: Guiding New Business Models - The court has strengthened rules to protect innovative achievements, guiding the healthy development of new business models [3]. - The case involving a third-party trading platform for online games highlighted the responsibility of platforms to prevent illegal activities like cheating and money laundering [3]. - The "transformation comic effect" case affirmed that the structure and parameters of AI models are protected under unfair competition law, promoting orderly competition in the AI industry [3].