Workflow
百令颗粒
icon
Search documents
30亿“百令”蛋糕硝烟未熄:华东医药1.11亿专利诉讼一审败诉
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-19 08:33
Core Viewpoint - The recent patent infringement lawsuit between Huadong Medicine and Zhaoli Pharmaceutical has concluded with Huadong Medicine's subsidiary losing the case, which involved over 1.11 billion yuan in claims, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the market for fermented Cordyceps sinensis products [1][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit focused on the patent rights related to the invention of fermented Cordyceps sinensis powder and its formulations, with Huadong Medicine claiming infringement by Zhaoli Pharmaceutical's product, Bailin tablets [2][8]. - The Zhejiang High Court ruled that the accused products did not fall under the protection of the claimed patent, leading to the dismissal of all claims by Huadong Medicine and requiring them to pay over 590,000 yuan in court fees [3][10]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The dispute reflects a significant market battle over the Bailin series, which has historically generated substantial revenue for Huadong Medicine, with sales peaking at 3.486 billion yuan in 2019 [4][11]. - Zhaoli Pharmaceutical has disrupted Huadong Medicine's market dominance by acquiring an 81% stake in Qinhai Zhu Feng Winter Worm Summer Grass Pharmaceutical Co., thus integrating Bailin tablets into its portfolio [5][12]. - Zhaoli Pharmaceutical's Bailin series has seen a 38.51% increase in sales revenue, aided by its inclusion in multiple national insurance and basic drug catalogs, indicating a rapid market penetration [5][12]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The failed acquisition attempt by Huadong Medicine to gain control over Zhaoli Pharmaceutical in 2019 has intensified the competitive landscape, leading to a reliance on patent litigation as a defense strategy [6][12]. - Analysts suggest that the lawsuit's outcome is critical not only for the 1.11 billion yuan claim but also for Huadong Medicine's market influence in a sector valued at 30 billion yuan [6][12].
年销30亿元单品专利战败,690亿医药巨头:要上诉
21世纪经济报道· 2025-12-17 00:46
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the patent dispute between two listed pharmaceutical companies, Huadong Medicine and Zhaoli Pharmaceutical, focusing on the core ingredient of the Bailing capsule, which has historically generated significant sales revenue for Huadong Medicine [5][8]. Group 1: Patent Dispute Details - The lawsuit centers on the patent rights of fermented Cordyceps sinensis powder, which is the main ingredient in the Bailing capsule, previously a unique product for Huadong Medicine with annual sales exceeding 3 billion yuan [8][12]. - Huadong Medicine filed a lawsuit against Zhaoli Pharmaceutical and its subsidiaries, claiming infringement of its patent rights and seeking approximately 1.11 billion yuan in damages [11][12]. - The Zhejiang High Court ruled against Huadong Medicine in the first instance, dismissing all claims and ordering it to bear over 590,000 yuan in court fees [13][14]. Group 2: Market Competition - The competition between Huadong Medicine and Zhaoli Pharmaceutical is intensifying, with both companies nearly splitting the market for Bailing products [8][17]. - Huadong Medicine's Bailing capsule was a major product, achieving sales of over 3 billion yuan in 2019, but faced a decline in sales due to price reductions after being included in the medical insurance directory [17][18]. - Zhaoli Pharmaceutical, through acquisitions, has positioned itself in the Bailing market, with its Bailing tablet generating revenue of 2.02 billion yuan in 2023, down 21.23% from the previous year due to competitive pressures [18][19]. Group 3: Future Outlook - Zhaoli Pharmaceutical aims to grow its Bailing series into a 1 billion yuan product line, with expectations of increased revenue as the product gains market traction following its recent approval [19]. - As of December 16, 2023, Huadong Medicine's market capitalization was approximately 69.1 billion yuan, while Zhaoli Pharmaceutical's was around 11.9 billion yuan, indicating a significant disparity in market valuation [19].