（原标题：马11 月份税收达22亿卢菲亚，比去年同期增长16.6%） 马11 月份税收达22亿卢菲亚，比去年同期增长16.6%。马税务局(MIRA)数据显示，税 收增长主要得益于旅游商品和服务税 (TGST)、绿色税、离境税以及长期农业岛屿租金 收入的增加。其中绿色税和机场离境税收入较去年11月翻了一番。 ...

Group 1: Tax Policy Overview - The UK Treasury is planning to introduce a 20% "exit tax" targeting wealthy individuals who move abroad but still hold assets in the UK [1][3] - The tax will apply to individuals who have lived in the UK for at least 7 years in the past 10 years and have a net worth exceeding £2 million, taxing the capital gains on their UK assets upon departure [3][5] - The tax will be retroactively applied, requiring individuals to pay 20% on the appreciation of their UK assets over the past 5 years at the time of their departure [5][6] Group 2: Impact on Wealthy Individuals - Following the announcement, there has been a significant increase in inquiries from high-net-worth individuals about overseas properties, with a 300% rise in consultations for properties in low-tax countries [8] - Wealthy individuals are accelerating asset transfers, with reports of significant stock transfers and property sales to avoid the impending tax [8][10] - The number of UK wealthy individuals applying for "golden visas" in EU countries has surged by 240%, indicating a trend of relocation [10] Group 3: Market Reactions - The luxury real estate market in London is experiencing a downturn, with a 58% increase in listings and a notable drop in sale prices, indicating a potential 15%-20% decline in high-end property values over the next year [12] - The stock market is also affected, with shares of luxury brands and high-end automotive manufacturers declining, reflecting concerns over reduced demand due to wealthy individuals relocating [14] - Major shareholders in companies with significant holdings by wealthy individuals are beginning to reduce their stakes, further pressuring stock prices [14] Group 4: Broader Economic Implications - The exit tax aims to address the long-standing issue of tax avoidance by wealthy individuals and is expected to generate an additional £2 billion to £3 billion annually for public services [16] - However, the policy has faced criticism for potentially harming the UK's attractiveness for investment and talent, with concerns about capital flight and economic growth [18] - Other countries are actively promoting tax incentives to attract UK wealthy individuals, further complicating the situation for the UK [20][22] Group 5: Lessons and Future Considerations - The situation highlights the complex relationship between tax policy and capital mobility, emphasizing the need for balanced approaches that consider both fiscal needs and investment attractiveness [24][26] - The ongoing market volatility and the response from low-tax jurisdictions underscore the importance of thoughtful policy design to maintain economic stability and attract talent [26]