10月10日，鑫科材料盘中上涨2.11%，截至10:49，报4.36元/股，成交3.41亿元，换手率4.41%，总市值 78.75亿元。 资金流向方面，主力资金净流出830.73万元，特大单买入3606.93万元，占比10.59%，卖出3289.02万 元，占比9.66%；大单买入6194.47万元，占比18.18%，卖出7343.11万元，占比21.56%。 分红方面，鑫科材料A股上市后累计派现1.91亿元。近三年，累计派现0.00元。 机构持仓方面，截止2025年6月30日，鑫科材料十大流通股东中，香港中央结算有限公司位居第二大流 通股东，持股1026.02万股，为新进股东。 责任编辑：小浪快报 今年以来鑫科材料已经10次登上龙虎榜，最近一次登上龙虎榜为2月11日，当日龙虎榜净买入-7154.77 万元；买入总计1.69亿元 ，占总成交额比7.64%；卖出总计2.40亿元 ，占总成交额比10.89%。 资料显示，安徽鑫科新材料股份有限公司位于安徽省芜湖市鸠江区永安路88号，成立日期1998年9月28 日，上市日期2000年11月22日，公司主营业务涉及高性能、高精度铜合金板带产品的研发、生产和销 售。主营 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information about the report industry investment rating in the provided content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The implementation of the debt - resolution package has restricted the financing of traditional urban investment companies, and localities have established industrial companies. The report analyzes the characteristics of platform companies that achieved their first - time bond financing since 2025 to provide references for industrial companies' bond financing [1]. - Platform companies should focus on market - oriented operations, policy alignment, and combine external support with self - development for successful bond financing and long - term development [27][28][29]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Bond First - time Financing Subject Characteristics 3.1.1 Overall Overview - From January to July 2025, 149 platform companies achieved their first - time bond financing, reaching 84% of the whole year of 2024. Only 7 out of these companies had over 30% of their revenue from public welfare business, indicating the positive progress of the industrial transformation of urban investment companies [2]. 3.1.2 Regional Distribution - In the past two years, the regional distribution of first - time bond - issuing platforms was highly concentrated in four eastern coastal provinces (Zhejiang, Shandong, Jiangsu, and Guangdong), accounting for over 50%. However, from January to July 2025, their combined proportion decreased, while the proportion of central provinces such as Anhui, Henan, and Hubei increased slightly, and some of the twelve key provinces also had new additions [5]. 3.1.3 Credit Rating - From January to July 2025, the credit levels of first - time bond - issuing platforms were still mainly AA +, but the structure changed. The proportion of AAA and AA + level platform companies decreased year - on - year, while that of AA level increased, and the central level shifted down. Also, 3 platform companies without a subject rating issued bonds, indicating a marginal relaxation of market access [7]. 3.1.4 Shareholder Hierarchy - From January to July 2025, the direct shareholding ratio of the government and related institutions in platform companies dropped to 44%, showing a transformation from "direct intervention" to "indirect control". Platform companies prefer to expand financing through their subsidiaries, which have competitive advantages in the bond market [9]. 3.1.5 First - time Bond Fund - Raising Purposes - In recent years, the purposes of platform companies' first - time bond fund - raising were characterized by "stabilizing debt + promoting development". From January to July 2025, the proportion of using funds for debt repayment and working capital replenishment decreased, while the proportion of bonds invested in major projects such as industrial park renewal and rural revitalization, science and technology innovation projects, and those supporting small and medium - sized enterprises increased [11][12]. 3.1.6 Business Direction - In 2025, only 5% of the first - time bond - issuing platforms still focused on public welfare businesses such as infrastructure construction and land consolidation, while industrial park operation, public utilities, real estate, finance, and cultural and tourism operation became the main areas of transformation [14]. 3.1.7 Financial Performance - Asset scale: The central value of the total asset scale of high - level platforms was significantly higher than that of low - level platforms, and it was positively correlated with the subject level. The central value of the total asset scale in 2025 was lower than that in 2024 [16]. - Asset - liability ratio: The differences in the asset - liability ratio among different levels of platforms were not large, and the central value in 2025 was lower than that in 2024 [16]. - Net profit: The central value of net profit of high - level platforms was significantly higher than that of low - level platforms, and it was positively correlated with the subject level. The central value of net profit in 2025 was lower than that in 2024, and the overall net profit of platform companies was still at a low level [16]. 3.2 Case Analysis 3.2.1 Case 1: Industrial Investment - Reorganization: Acquired a listed company in the material field in 2023 and received capital injection and asset transfer from the county state - owned assets office in 2024 [18]. - Business structure: Formed a complementary model of "strategic emerging industry support + people's livelihood guarantee" with copper - based alloy materials, irradiated special cables, and medical device distribution as the main businesses [21]. - Financial performance: All revenues were from market - oriented operations, but government subsidies accounted for a relatively high proportion. It achieved first - time financing due to successful market - oriented transformation, strategic alignment, and regional franchise advantages [21]. 3.2.2 Case 2: Public Utilities - Reorganization: The company's equity was transferred up one level in 2024 and received large - scale capital injection, building a business pattern centered on public utilities [22]. - Business structure: Formed a "heating + water services" dual - wheel - driven public utility system with significant regional franchise advantages [22]. - Financial performance: The proportion of quasi - public welfare income was over 80%, and government subsidies contributed significantly to profits. It achieved first - time financing due to enhanced capital strength and strong regional franchise advantages [22][23]. 3.2.3 Case 3: Cultural and Tourism Operations - Reorganization: Built a diversified business pattern by incorporating multiple subsidiaries in 2022 [25]. - Business structure: Market - oriented business revenue accounted for over 90%, forming a collaborative model of "cultural export leadership, cultural and tourism service support, and transportation network support" [25]. - Financial performance: Operating income accounted for over 90%, but government subsidies were relatively high. It achieved first - time financing due to complementary business sectors, policy support, and improved financial stability [25][26]. 3.3 Platform Company Bond First - time Issuance Insights - Market - oriented operation should be the core of transformation. Platform companies need to transform into industrial operation entities, and the bond market's evaluation logic has shifted from "government credit endorsement" to "self - sustainable operation" [27]. - Policy alignment is the key to financing. Companies should align their resource endowments with national needs and serve major national strategies [28]. - External support and self - development are both necessary. External support provides a foundation for first - time financing, but self - development is crucial for long - term competitiveness [28].

Group 1 - The company's total operating revenue for the first half of 2025 reached 2.169 billion yuan, an increase of 17.17% year-on-year, while the net profit attributable to shareholders was only 19.73 million yuan, a decrease of 42.16% year-on-year [2] - The gross profit margin decreased to 6.99%, down 19.03% year-on-year, and the net profit margin fell to 1.15%, down 53.2% year-on-year, indicating pressure on cost control and reduced profitability [3] - The company reported a negative operating cash flow per share of -0.07 yuan, a decrease of 249.55% year-on-year, and accounts receivable accounted for 1081.48% of the latest annual net profit, posing potential cash flow risks [4] Group 2 - The main business revenue primarily comes from copper-based alloy materials, generating 2.029 billion yuan, accounting for 93.52% of total revenue, with a gross profit margin of 6.69% [6] - The copper strip processing industry faces multiple challenges, including increased global economic downturn pressure, insufficient domestic and foreign market demand, intense industry competition, copper price fluctuations, and policy adjustments [7] - Despite the challenges, the company continues to strengthen technological research and development and industrial upgrades to enhance its core competitiveness [7]