尽管中期期间的估计溢利较去年同期有所下降，但预期将高于截至2025年3月31日止财政年度的股东应 占溢利约1000万港元。此改善彰显集团凭借强大品牌基础及稳健采购能力所制定的竞争性定价策略在维 持盈利能力方面成效卓着。在中期期间，集团持续开发新产品，且消费者对集团代理的日本雪糕系列需 求不断上升，特别是OHAYO焦糖布丁雪糕。此外，集团推出的其他受欢迎产品还包括卡乐B热浪虾片 和Pokka Sapporo减轻水肿及减轻疲劳的饮料，这些都为集团在市场上增添了动力。 四洲集团(00374)发布公告，预期集团截至2025年9月30日止六个月将取得公司股东应占溢利介于1100万 港元至1500万港元，而截至2024年9月30日止六个月则取得股东应占溢利约2000万港元。溢利减少主要 归因于中国香港及中国内地消费信心疲弱，造成了挑战性的营商环境。 ...

门店增长方面，截至本季末，名创优品集团全球门店突破8000家，实现了又一里程碑。同时，集团同店 销售持续向好，实现了中个位数的增长，增长质量更高、可持续性更强。 名创优品集团(NYSE：MNSO；HKEX：9896)公布2025年第三季度财务报告。报告期内，集团总营收达 58亿元，同比增长28%，其中名创优品品牌营收52.2亿元，同比增长23%，TOP TOY品牌营收5.7亿元， 实现111%的同比增长。名创优品集团该季度毛利润为25.9亿元，同比增长28%，毛利率为44.7%。经调 整净利润（非国际财务报告准则（Non-IFRS））7.7亿元，同比增长12%，经调整净利率13.2%，展现出 强劲的业务增长韧性与盈利能力。 ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Net earnings for Q3 2025 increased by over $700,000 to approximately $4.3 million compared to roughly $3.6 million in Q2 2025 [6][7] - Net interest income rose by about $800,000 quarter over quarter, from just over $10.2 million to just over $11 million [7] - Pre-tax, pre-provision income reached approximately $17.35 million year to date, representing an annualized run rate of about $23.1 million [8][10] - Core return on average equity (ROE) was approximately 22.6% for the quarter, one of the highest levels among community banks nationwide [8] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Gross loans ended the quarter at $813.7 million, up from $784.6 million last quarter, representing a strong acceleration of loan growth [14] - Total deposits grew to $959.5 million, with $80.6 million in new deposits during Q3 2025 [15][18] - Non-interest income increased nearly $1.5 million year over year, driven by service charges and fees [14][16] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Total assets grew by $83.9 million to $1.08 billion as of September 30, 2025 [17][18] - The efficiency ratio remained highly competitive at 50.7%, well below the peer average of 68.02% [19] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to reinforce its position as one of the most dynamic and rapidly growing community banks in South Florida while maintaining a relationship-driven culture [20][21] - The focus remains on utilizing strong capital and a dedicated team to support growth and expansion [20] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in maintaining strong loan growth and profitability, emphasizing the importance of community relationships [20][39] - The company is actively searching for mergers and acquisitions to further enhance growth [36] Other Important Information - The company celebrated its 25th anniversary, highlighting its growth from a single branch to a $1.1 billion institution [3][6] - The allowance for credit losses to loans ratio stands at 1.23%, above the national peer average of 1.17% [17] Q&A Session Summary Question: What drove the expansion in Q3 NIM, and how does year-to-date performance compare with margin levels going forward? - The expansion in NIM was driven by older loans running off at lower interest rates and newer loans being issued at higher rates [26] Question: What is driving the deposit growth, and how is the deposit mix evolving? - The growth is attributed to a loyal customer base, with a historical mix of one-third non-interest-bearing deposits [27][28] Question: Which loan segments are driving growth, and how do you feel about overall credit risk? - The majority of growth is in commercial real estate, with strong asset quality maintained [30][31] Question: How does management evaluate capital adequacy relative to regulatory requirements and internal targets? - The company has a robust capital structure, well above regulatory requirements, and is actively seeking growth opportunities [34][36] Question: How is the bank positioning itself competitively amid regional CRE dynamics and deposit competition? - The bank differentiates itself through strong customer relationships and service quality rather than competing solely on rates [38][39] Question: Can the bank attract New York City depositors given recent events? - The bank's customer base is not limited to South Florida, and there are opportunities to expand beyond current markets [42][44]

门店破万却陷"高开高关"困局，塔斯汀中国汉堡（以下简称"塔斯汀"）的扩张之路暗藏隐忧。近日，汉 堡品牌塔斯汀门店规模破万，短短几年内其发展速度有目共睹。然而，高速开店背后却呈现"高开高 关"趋势——近90天内该品牌新增门店超千家的同时关闭700余家。值得注意的是，塔斯汀关联公司近期 的股权变更与注册资本增加，引发业内上市猜测。无论上市与否，食品安全与门店运营质量仍是品牌高 速扩张背后不可忽视的核心根基。 开小店抢占一线市场 又一汉堡品牌达到万店规模。塔斯汀门店规模破万的消息近日引发业内关注。极海品牌监测数据显示， 目前西式快餐品牌中塔斯汀排名第三，门店数量为1.07万家，规模超过麦当劳中国，前两名分别为华莱 士和肯德基。这也意味着，塔斯汀用了几年的时间赶超了麦当劳中国三十几年的发展规模。 从塔斯汀门店的分布来看，新一线及以下线级城市为品牌的主战场。根据极海品牌监测，塔斯汀在一线 城市门店占比为7.5%，而在新一线、二线、三线城市门店占比分别为21.42%、20.07%和24.34%。若按 照功能区划分，塔斯汀超过48%的门店分布在住宅区。 不过，随着规模不断扩大，塔斯汀也在尝试更多模式和场景来踏入一线市场。一 ...

Financial Performance - Q3 2025 revenue reached $45.6 million, a 25% year-over-year increase[9] - Q3 2025 GMV totaled $197.2 million, representing a 21% year-over-year growth[9] - Loss before income tax improved to $17.7 million in Q3 2025[7], a 1% year-over-year improvement[9] - Adjusted EBITDA loss was $14.0 million in Q3 2025, compared to $17.0 million in Q3 2024[9, 69] Usage and Customer Metrics - Physical goods orders increased by 34% year-over-year in Q3 2025[7, 20] - Quarterly Active Customers for physical goods grew by 23% year-over-year[7, 17] - Cash burn increased to $15.8 million in Q3 2025, compared to $12.4 million in Q2 2025[7, 9] Regional Performance - Nigeria showed strong momentum, with physical goods orders up 30% and GMV up 43% year-over-year[7] - Egypt's physical goods GMV, excluding corporate sales, grew by 44% year-over-year[25, 26] Future Outlook - The company is on track for targeted full-year 2027 profitability[7] - The company forecasts Loss before Income tax to be between negative $50 million and negative $55 million for full-year 2025[62]

门店破万却陷"高开高关"困局，塔斯汀中国汉堡（以下简称"塔斯汀"）的扩张之路暗藏隐忧。近日，汉堡品牌塔斯汀门店规模破万，短短几年内其发展速度 有目共睹。然而，高速开店背后却呈现"高开高关"趋势——近90天内该品牌新增门店超千家的同时关闭700余家。值得注意的是，塔斯汀关联公司近期的股 权变更与注册资本增加，引发业内上市猜测。无论上市与否，食品安全与门店运营质量仍是品牌高速扩张背后不可忽视的核心根基。 开小店抢占一线市场 又一汉堡品牌达到万店规模。近日，塔斯汀门店规模破万的消息在业内引发关注。极海品牌监测数据显示，目前西式快餐品牌中塔斯汀排名第三，门店数量 为10700家，规模超过麦当劳中国，前两名分别是华莱士和肯德基。这也意味着，塔斯汀用了几年的时间赶超了麦当劳中国三十几年的发展规模。 从塔斯汀门店的分布来看，新一线及以下线级城市为品牌的主战场。根据极海品牌监测，塔斯汀在一线城市门店占比为7.5%，而在新一线、二线、三线城 市门店占比分别为21.42%、20.07%和24.34%。若按照功能区划分，塔斯汀超过48%的门店分布在住宅区。 不过，随着规模的不断扩大，塔斯汀也在尝试更多模式和场景来踏入一线市场。一方 ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Total revenue for the second quarter reached $7 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 19.3%, year over year [4] - Gross profit rose to $2.4 million, with a gross margin of 34.3%, up from $1.5 million and 25.3% in the same quarter last year, reflecting a nine-point margin expansion [4] - Operating income was $190,000, compared to an operating loss of $975,000 in the same quarter of the prior fiscal year [4] - Net income for the current quarter was $1,000, or $0.00 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $1.2 million, or $0.16 loss per diluted share in the same period of the prior year [5] - Cash at the end of the period was $649,000, down from $780,000 in the prior year, while working capital decreased to $39,000 from $550,000 [5] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The increase in total revenue was driven by higher bulk sales and strong performance in online channels [3] - Continued gains in production efficiency contributed to the improvement in gross margin [4] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Tariffs impacted contract extraction competitiveness, but the company maintained focus on operational excellence and cost control [3] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on building a stronger, more resilient business position for long-term success, emphasizing operational excellence and disciplined cost control [3] - There is a commitment to improving profitability trends and maintaining momentum across brands despite challenging market conditions [3] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the company's positive direction, citing continued momentum in sales growth and profitability [3] - The management highlighted the importance of adapting to market challenges while focusing on operational improvements [3] Other Important Information - The company has not received any questions during the call, indicating a lack of immediate investor inquiries [6] Q&A Session Summary - No questions were posed during the call, and thus there are no responses to summarize [6]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is "Buy" and is maintained [7]. Core Views - The company reported a significant decline in revenue and net profit for the first three quarters of 2025, with revenue at 337 million yuan, down 48.52% year-on-year, and net profit at 18 million yuan, down 83.21% year-on-year [4][10]. - The third quarter of 2025 saw revenue of 124 million yuan, a decrease of 36.16% year-on-year, and a net profit of 5.61 million yuan, down 37.91% year-on-year [4][10]. - Despite the challenging external environment, the company remains a leader in the integrated stove sector and is exploring various marketing strategies to boost revenue and profitability [10]. Summary by Sections Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, the company achieved a gross margin of 38.48%, down 4.79 percentage points year-on-year, while the gross margin for Q3 2025 was 39.09%, down 1.70 percentage points year-on-year [10]. - The operating profit for the first three quarters was 11 million yuan, a decline of 87.82% year-on-year, with an operating profit margin of 3.36%, down 10.82 percentage points year-on-year [10]. - The net cash flow from operating activities was -5.45 million yuan, a significant decrease of 127.03% year-on-year, primarily due to reduced cash receipts from sales [10]. Market Context - The integrated stove industry is experiencing a downturn, with retail sales in the first half of 2025 at 6.57 billion yuan, down 27.6% year-on-year, and retail volume at 781,000 units, down 31.5% year-on-year [10]. - The company's sales and management expenses have been optimized, with a sales expense ratio decrease of 3.05 percentage points for the first three quarters, attributed to adjustments in advertising spending [10]. Future Outlook - The company is expected to recover its profitability and scale, with projected net profits of 29 million yuan, 33 million yuan, and 41 million yuan for 2025, 2026, and 2027, respectively, corresponding to PE ratios of 171.58, 147.89, and 119.10 [10].

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Outperform" rating for the company [2][7]. Core Insights - The company reported a recovery in profit growth in Q3 2025, with a slight decline in revenue and a notable increase in net profit for the quarter [7]. - Online sales showed strong growth, while offline channels are still undergoing adjustments [7]. - The company has a strong brand presence in the mid-to-high-end women's clothing sector, with improved gross margins and cash flow [7]. Financial Data and Profit Forecast - Total revenue for the first three quarters of 2025 decreased by 4.2% year-on-year to 1.545 billion yuan, while net profit attributable to the parent company fell by 15.4% to 236 million yuan [6][7]. - Q3 2025 revenue decreased by 1.1% year-on-year to 480 million yuan, but net profit increased by 16.6% to 70 million yuan [7]. - The gross margin for Q3 2025 improved to 75.5%, with a net profit margin of 15.3% [7][10]. - The company expects net profits for 2025-2027 to be 302 million, 322 million, and 354 million yuan respectively, with corresponding PE ratios of 20, 19, and 17 times [7][6].

Quantitative Models and Construction Quantitative Model Framework: Asset Style Rotation - **Model Name**: Asset Style Rotation Framework - **Model Construction Idea**: The model identifies asset styles based on intrinsic attributes tied to industry lifecycle changes, categorizing assets into five style stages: external growth, quality growth, quality dividend, value dividend, and bankruptcy value. It aims to determine the dominant market style by comparing asset advantages using a priority sequence of g > ROE > D[5][6][9] - **Model Construction Process**: - **Step 1**: Define five asset style stages based on industry lifecycle changes - **Step 2**: Compare asset advantages using the sequence g > ROE > D, where: - g represents growth rate - ROE represents return on equity - D represents dividend yield - **Step 3**: Evaluate whether assets are "good" and whether they are "expensive" to identify advantageous assets - **Step 4**: Focus on the most advantageous sectors based on the current market environment[5][6][9] - **Model Evaluation**: The framework has demonstrated strong explanatory power for A-share style rotation since 2009, achieving an annualized return of 27.35%[16] - **Model Testing Results**: - Annualized return since 2009: 27.35% - Historical excess returns in specific years (e.g., 2017: 27%, 2020: 44%, 2024: 52%)[16][19] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Factor: Pre-Expected Growth (gf) - **Factor Name**: Pre-Expected Growth (gf) - **Factor Construction Idea**: Focuses on analyst expectations for high growth sectors, regardless of lifecycle stage[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Step 1**: Use analyst forecasts to identify sectors with high expected growth - **Step 2**: Calculate the spread (Δgf) between top-performing and bottom-performing groups to measure growth advantage[21] - **Factor Evaluation**: Δgf continues to expand, indicating strong analyst optimism for high-growth sectors[21][31] - **Factor Testing Results**: Δgf expansion observed, with top-performing sectors showing significant upward adjustments[21][31] Factor: Actual Growth (g) - **Factor Name**: Actual Growth (g) - **Factor Construction Idea**: Measures performance momentum during transition and growth stages[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Step 1**: Calculate the spread (Δg) between top-performing and bottom-performing groups based on actual growth rates - **Step 2**: Evaluate industry momentum and growth differentiation[25] - **Factor Evaluation**: Δg continues to contract, suggesting reduced differentiation in growth performance across sectors[25] - **Factor Testing Results**: Δg contraction observed, with top-performing groups declining and bottom-performing groups improving[25] Factor: ROE (Return on Equity) - **Factor Name**: ROE (Return on Equity) - **Factor Construction Idea**: Focuses on valuation levels under the PB-ROE framework during mature stages[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Step 1**: Identify high ROE sectors - **Step 2**: Evaluate valuation levels using PB-ROE residuals - **Step 3**: Measure asset advantage differences using ROE spread[27] - **Factor Evaluation**: ROE advantage has bottomed out and started to recover, indicating potential fundamental improvement[27][31] - **Factor Testing Results**: ROE spread shows recovery, with low beta exposure and reduced crowding in top-performing groups[27][30] Factor: Dividend Yield (D) - **Factor Name**: Dividend Yield (D) - **Factor Construction Idea**: Focuses on dividend yield and additional characteristics during mature stages[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Step 1**: Identify high dividend yield sectors - **Step 2**: Measure crowding levels and evaluate attractiveness based on yield spreads[31] - **Factor Evaluation**: High dividend yield assets remain crowded, and further overweighting is not recommended[31] - **Factor Testing Results**: Elevated crowding levels observed since mid-2024, with limited attractiveness under current market conditions[31][33] Factor: Bankruptcy Value (PB+SIZE) - **Factor Name**: Bankruptcy Value (PB+SIZE) - **Factor Construction Idea**: Focuses on valuation and restructuring expectations during stagnation and recession stages[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Step 1**: Identify sectors with low PB and small market capitalization - **Step 2**: Evaluate attractiveness based on PB+SIZE scores[49] - **Factor Evaluation**: Demonstrated significant excess returns during specific periods (e.g., 2015-2016, 2021-2023)[49] - **Factor Testing Results**: Recent recommendations include sectors such as animal vaccines, fuel gas, and textile products, with positive performance over the past three months[49] --- Backtesting Results for Strategies Pre-Expected Growth Strategy - **Recommended Sectors**: Culture and entertainment, lithium batteries, PCB, shipbuilding, tungsten[35] - **Performance Metrics**: - Culture and entertainment: +12.80% - Lithium batteries: +49.71% - PCB: +37.74% - Shipbuilding: +7.21% - Tungsten: +52.27%[35] Actual Growth Strategy - **Recommended Sectors**: Coal chemical, battery services, lithium chemical products, rare earth and magnetic materials, other home appliances[38] - **Performance Metrics**: - Coal chemical: +13.04% - Battery services: +28.25% - Lithium chemical products: +62.42% - Rare earth and magnetic materials: +26.15% - Other home appliances: +53.68%[38] ROE Strategy - **Recommended Sectors**: Agriculture, liquor, power distribution equipment, non-dairy beverages, network connection and tower setup[40] - **Performance Metrics**: - Agriculture: +4.31% - Liquor: +2.35% - Power distribution equipment: +13.72% - Non-dairy beverages: +4.82% - Network connection and tower setup: +80.30%[40] Quality Dividend Strategy - **Recommended Sectors**: Glass fiber, boiler equipment, automotive motors and controls, lithium battery equipment, network connection and tower setup[43] - **Performance Metrics**: - Glass fiber: +28.94% - Boiler equipment: +28.42% - Automotive motors and controls: +59.57% - Lithium battery equipment: +68.04% - Network connection and tower setup: +80.30%[43] Value Dividend Strategy - **Recommended Sectors**: Security, daily chemicals, pet food, service robots, network connection and tower setup[46] - **Performance Metrics**: - Security: +16.06% - Daily chemicals: -0.98% - Pet food: -5.82% - Service robots: +0.01% - Network connection and tower setup: +80.30%[46] Bankruptcy Value Strategy - **Recommended Sectors**: Animal vaccines, fuel gas, textile products, dyeing, building decoration[49] - **Performance Metrics**: - Animal vaccines: +8.59% - Fuel gas: +15.29% - Textile products: +10.19% - Dyeing: +9.37% - Building decoration: +11.57%[49]