【文/观察者网 熊超然】澳大利亚政界频繁放风，以所谓"安全风险"为由，威胁要从中国岚桥集团处收回北部达尔文港的经营权。据央视新闻报 道，中国外交部发言人郭嘉昆对此已强调，有关中国企业通过市场方式获得了达尔文港的租约，其合法权益应该受到充分保护。 早在今年大选竞选期间，澳大利亚总理阿尔巴尼斯就曾放话要收回达尔文港，反对党自由党也发出了同样的竞选承诺，而美国也在背后不断施 压。不过，这笔交易发生时曾担任澳大利亚北领地总检察长的约翰·埃尔芬克（John Elferink），则批驳这场争论是"猖獗的政治投机主义"，并嘲 讽了有关达尔文港可能被用来监视美国军事行动的荒谬说法。 "达尔文码头（Darwin wharf）有很多咖啡馆，你可以买一杯卡布奇诺，还能比在港口更好地观赏美国军舰。"埃尔芬克补充说，由于无力承担所 需的巨额投资，北领地别无选择，只能选择将港口出租。"（港口）有些地方正在下沉。"他说道。 此外，埃尔芬克认为中企目前处于有利的谈判地位，并对澳大利亚政客在竞选期间操弄达尔文港议题感到遗憾，他反问："哪有打扑克时先亮出 底牌再下注的道理？" 达尔文港 澳大利亚北领地政府网 此前，澳大利亚前几届政府盲目跟随美国 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the Darwin Port lease agreement between China's Landbridge Group and the Northern Territory government, which was obtained through a public bidding process and complies with Australian laws and market rules [1] - Australian Prime Minister Albanese mentioned that the government has been formulating a plan to address the port issue and has engaged in informal negotiations with potential buyers [1][3] - Landbridge Group has made significant investments in the port's infrastructure and operations over the past decade, turning the port from a loss-making entity to a profitable one, contributing positively to the local economy [1][4] Group 2 - The Australian government, under the 2020 Foreign Relations Act, has the authority to veto agreements made by state governments with foreign entities based on national security concerns [3] - Landbridge Group's non-executive director, Terry O'Connor, stated that the company has no intention of selling the port and has not engaged in any negotiations regarding its sale [3] - Concerns regarding national security risks associated with the port have been dismissed by O'Connor, who emphasized that there have been no actual risks or concerns in the past decade [4] Group 3 - Local leaders and experts have expressed that reclaiming Darwin Port could damage investor confidence and the Northern Territory's economy, highlighting the port's significance as one of the few operational projects in the area [4][5] - The relationship between China and Australia is framed as a comprehensive strategic partnership, with calls for a fair and transparent business environment for Chinese enterprises in Australia [5]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese ambassador emphasizes the importance of respecting the contract signed by the Chinese company Landbridge Group for the operation of Darwin Port, highlighting the need for fair treatment of foreign investments in Australia [1]. Group 1 - The lease agreement for Darwin Port was obtained by Landbridge Group through a public bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market rules [1]. - Over the past ten years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in the infrastructure and management of Darwin Port, turning it from a loss-making entity to a profitable one, thus contributing positively to the local economy [1]. - The ambassador argues that it is morally inappropriate to reclaim the port when it is profitable after leasing it out during loss-making periods [1]. Group 2 - The lease is considered a commercial contract, and the ambassador urges the Australian government to objectively view the Darwin Port project and honor its contractual commitments [1]. - The relationship between China and Australia is described as a comprehensive strategic partnership, with mutual trust and cooperation being in the best interest of both parties [1]. - The ambassador calls for the Australian government to create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia [1].