Core Viewpoint - Some banks are displaying higher annualized returns on their wealth management products in their apps compared to the actual recent returns, leading to investor concerns about misleading information [1][7]. Group 1: Discrepancy in Returns - Many banks show annualized returns since inception that are significantly higher than the recent monthly returns, indicating a potential misrepresentation of product performance [1][7]. - For example, a product from China Construction Bank shows an annualized return of 2.28% since its inception, while its recent one-month return is only 0.75% [3][7]. Group 2: Market Conditions - The discrepancy in returns is attributed to a declining interest rate environment and poor recent performance in the bond market, which affects the underlying assets of these wealth management products [3][5]. - The annualized return for bonds has decreased significantly, with the year-to-date return at only 0.46% and a one-month return of -0.43% [11]. Group 3: Regulatory Perspective - Current regulations do not explicitly prohibit banks from showcasing higher historical returns, allowing them to prioritize displaying more favorable figures [3][9]. - The China Banking Association's guidelines emphasize the need for transparency and accurate representation of past performance to protect investors' rights [11]. Group 4: Concerns About Performance Display - There are concerns that the practice of highlighting higher historical returns may mislead investors about the stability and future performance of these products [6][12]. - Experts suggest that banks should standardize the timeframes used for performance display across similar products to avoid selective reporting [12].

Core Viewpoint - Some banks are displaying higher annualized returns for their wealth management products than the actual recent returns, leading to concerns about transparency and accuracy in financial reporting [1][3]. Group 1: Discrepancy in Reported Returns - Investors have reported discrepancies between the annualized returns displayed on bank apps and the actual returns, with some banks showing significantly higher returns since the product's inception compared to recent performance [1][2]. - The discrepancy is attributed to a decline in bond market performance, which has affected the recent yields of wealth management products, while historical yields remain elevated due to previous market conditions [1][3]. Group 2: Regulatory and Compliance Issues - Current regulations do not explicitly prohibit banks from showcasing higher historical returns, which may lead to a preference for displaying more favorable figures [1][4]. - The China Banking Association's guidelines emphasize that past performance should accurately reflect the investment manager's capabilities and inform investors, but the current practices may inflate perceived product performance [4]. Group 3: Market Trends and Performance Analysis - The overall trend in fixed-income assets, which form the basis of many wealth management products, is downward, with recent yields significantly lower than historical averages [3][4]. - For instance, the annualized yield for bonds has dropped to 0.46% year-to-date, while the annualized yield over the past three years is 4.90% [3].

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 每经记者|赵景致 每经编辑|魏文艺 近日，有投资者反映，部分银行App中展示的理财收益率与实际收益率不符，存在展示收益率过高的情 况。 《每日经济新闻》记者（以下简称"每经记者"）查询多家银行App发现，部分银行在主页展示的理财产 品成立以来年化收益率，与近一个月的年化收益率相比明显偏高。 究其原因，在降息周期内，此前几年债市表现较为出色，或者银行理财产品成立时底层资产处于市场低 位，加之近期债市表现欠佳，这些因素均会导致部分银行理财产品自成立以来的年化收益率显著高于近 期实际的年化收益率。 长沙银行"长吉添利15个月周期滚动式净值型"理财产品，风险等级为R3，页面显示成立以来年化收益 率为4.18%，从历史业绩来看，近1年的年化收益率为3.34%，近6个月的年化收益率为4.36%，近3个月 的年化收益率为2.10%，近1个月的年化收益率为-1.20%。 | | | 资深金融监管政策专家周毅钦向每经记者表示："（收益率）数据实际上肯定是不会错的，但刻意地选 择一个长期的或者较高的年化收益率进行展示，这种行为是有待商榷的。目前从监管要求上来看并没有 明确规定，这 ...