Core Viewpoint - A recent civil judgment revealed that a bank, specifically China Everbright Bank, was found liable for improper sales of trust products, leading to significant investor losses [1][7]. Group 1: Case Details - Investor Mr. Geng invested 3 million yuan in a coal industry trust product and only recovered approximately 1.6387 million yuan, resulting in a loss exceeding 45%, amounting to 1.36 million yuan [1][3]. - The Shanghai Financial Court ruled that the bank must bear 20% of the loss compensation due to its violation of sales regulations [1][3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The first-instance court identified three main issues: whether the bank acted as an agent in sales, whether it violated investor suitability obligations, and how to determine compensation responsibility [3][9]. - The court concluded that the bank failed to conduct any risk assessment before recommending the product to Mr. Geng, thus holding it partially responsible for the investment loss [3][9]. Group 3: Compensation and Appeals - The first-instance judgment ordered the bank to compensate Mr. Geng 272,514.17 yuan within ten days, while rejecting his other claims [4][10]. - Both parties appealed the first-instance ruling, but the Shanghai Financial Court upheld the original decision, confirming the facts and legal application were correct [5][11].

中国经济网北京2月11日讯 日前，中国裁判文书网公布的一则二审民事判决书，揭开了中国光大银行（601818）违规代销信托产品的隐秘一角。一位投资者 斥资300万元认购该行推介的煤炭产业信托，最终仅收回本金163.87万余元，亏损幅度超45%、金额高达136万余元。 通过案号的对比，可以发现涉案银行为中国光大银行，涉案信托产品为"长安信托·煤炭资源产业投资基金3号"。法院终审判决认定，作为代销机构的光大银 行存在违规销售行为，需承担20%的损失赔偿责任，即赔付投资者近27.3万元。 上海金融法院民事判决书【（2025）沪74民终1080号】显示，耿某在某银行市东支行处经某银行市东支行工作人员推荐，认购《某信托·煤炭资源产业投资 基金3号集合资金信托计划》，签署《某信托·煤炭资源产业投资基金3号集合资金信托计划认购风险申明书》。同日，耿某向某国际信托公司汇款300万元， 附言："耿某认购长安楼俊项目"。某国际信托公司合计向耿某分配信托收益285,000元，分配信托本金1,637,429.14元。 2015年10月27日，中国银行业监督管理委员会上海监管局出具银监发〔2015〕169号《上海银监局关于某银行上海分行 ...