Core Viewpoint - The National Cybersecurity Incident Response Center reported that 38 mobile applications were found to illegally collect and use personal information, highlighting ongoing concerns regarding data privacy and compliance with laws such as the Cybersecurity Law and the Personal Information Protection Law [1]. Group 1: Company Overview - Shanghai Yanshan Technology Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Shanghai 2345 Network Holdings Group Co., Ltd.) has undergone several name changes, with the most recent occurring in August 2023 [2]. - The company operates several well-known software products, including 2345.com, 2345 browser, and various other applications that cover both PC and mobile platforms [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Compliance - The detection of illegal data practices in 38 mobile applications was conducted by the Ministry of Public Security's Computer Information System Security Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Center, emphasizing the importance of compliance with national regulations [1]. - Specific issues identified in the 2345 browser included failure to clearly list the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection, as well as exceeding the scope of user authorization [1].

Core Viewpoint - The National Cybersecurity Center reported that 38 mobile applications were found to illegally collect and use personal information, violating laws such as the Cybersecurity Law and the Personal Information Protection Law [1][11]. Group 1: Violations of Personal Information Collection - Two applications failed to publicly disclose their rules for collecting and using personal information: "家政加" (5.3.5, VIVO) and "聘巢" (1.0.2, 应用宝) [1]. - Nineteen applications did not list the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection: "联想乐云" (6.8.20, 应用宝), "画啦啦美术课堂" (5.22.9, OPPO), "智通直聘" (11.14.0, 应用宝), among others [2]. - Four applications did not inform users of the purpose when requesting permission to collect personal information: "e家政" (4.0.10, VIVO), "in" (3.4.130, 豌豆荚), "聘巢" (1.0.2, 应用宝), and "找零工" (4.2.6, 豌豆荚) [3]. - Four applications failed to inform users of the purpose when collecting sensitive personal information: "我要聘" (1.2.10, VIVO), "闪电直聘" (3.1.0, 百度), "吉工家" (7.6.6, 百度), and "建筑招工" (7.6.5, 百度) [4]. - Three applications began collecting personal information before obtaining user consent: "秀色直播" (9.3.6, 华为), "微米浏览器" (BrowserV8.0.20250403, 百度), and "当日急聘" (7.4.4, VIVO) [5]. - Nineteen applications collected personal information beyond the scope authorized by users [6]. Group 2: Excessive Information Collection - Three applications had personal information protection policies that described the collection of information beyond what was necessary for their functions: "地铁查询宝" (1.1.7, 小米), "文件解压管家" (1.4.0, 小米), and "微车" (8.6.3, VIVO) [7]. - One application had permissions for collecting personal information that exceeded the necessary range for its functions: "爱看书免费小说" (8.2.4, 华为) [8]. - Six applications collected personal information more frequently than necessary for their functions: "豆果美食" (8.2.15.2, 华为), "百思漂流瓶" (9.13.81, 华为), "优惠券" (6.0.0, 小米), "乐播投屏" (5.11.80, 应用宝), "卡牛信用管家" (9.2.2, 应用宝), and "轻喜到家" (2.6.7, VIVO) [10]. - Two applications required users to enable permissions not needed for current functions: "同城招聘" (1.1.1, VIVO) and "找零工" (4.2.6, 豌豆荚) [12]. - One application forced users to provide unnecessary personal information: "好兔视频" (1.6.36.1, 华为) [13]. Group 3: User Rights and Options - One application did not provide users with a way to correct or supplement their personal information: "当日急聘" (7.4.4, VIVO) [14]. - One application did not offer a way for users to cancel their accounts: "找零工" (4.2.6, 豌豆荚) [15]. - Two applications set unreasonable conditions or additional requirements in the account cancellation process: "597直聘" (6.5.0, 应用宝) and "快马日结" (6.7.00, 百度) [16]. - Three applications did not provide options to exit or disable personalized display modes: "壁纸多多" (6.9.9.1, 豌豆荚), "找零工" (4.2.6, 豌豆荚), and "汇博招聘" (5.0.3, 豌豆荚) [17].

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the detection of 38 mobile applications that violate personal information protection laws, indicating a significant issue in compliance with regulations such as the Cybersecurity Law and the Personal Information Protection Law [1][10]. Group 1: Violations of Personal Information Collection - Two applications failed to publicly disclose their rules for collecting and using personal information: "家政加" and "聘巢" [1]. - Nineteen applications did not list the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection: "联想乐云", "画啦啦美术课堂", "智通直聘", "才通直聘", "达管家", "同城招聘", "e家政", "快马日结", "2345浏览器", "微米浏览器", "淘最热点", "当日急聘", "闪电直聘", "吉工家", "建筑招工", "微车", "in", "找零工", "汇博招聘" [2]. - Four applications did not inform users of the purpose when requesting permission to collect personal information: "e家政", "in", "聘巢", "找零工" [3]. - Four applications failed to inform users of the purpose when collecting sensitive personal information: "我要聘", "闪电直聘", "吉工家", "建筑招工" [4]. - Three applications began collecting personal information before obtaining user consent: "秀色直播", "微米浏览器", "当日急聘" [5]. - Nineteen applications collected personal information beyond the scope authorized by users: "联想乐云", "画啦啦美术课堂", "达管家", "德管家", "他趣", "同城招聘", "e家政", "快马日结", "2345浏览器", "微米浏览器", "淘最热点", "当日急聘", "闪电直聘", "吉工家", "建筑招工", "微车", "in", "找零工", "汇博招聘" [6]. Group 2: Inadequate User Rights and Information - Three applications had personal information protection policies that described the need for information collection beyond necessary functions: "地铁查询宝", "文件解压管家", "微车" [6]. - One application declared the collection of personal information permissions in its configuration file that exceeded necessary functions: "爱看书免费小说" [7]. - Six applications collected personal information beyond the necessary scope of their functions: "豆果美食", "百思漂流瓶", "优惠券", "乐播投屏", "卡牛信用管家", "轻喜到家" [9]. - One application collected personal information more frequently than necessary: "家宝兔" [9]. - Two applications required users to enable permissions not needed for current functions: "同城招聘", "找零工" [9]. - One application forced users to provide unnecessary personal information: "e家政" [9]. - One application did not provide users with a way to correct or supplement their personal information: "当日急聘" [9]. - One application did not offer a way for users to cancel their accounts: "找零工" [9]. - Two applications set unreasonable conditions or additional requirements in the account cancellation process: "597直聘", "快马日结" [9]. - Three applications did not provide an option to exit or close personalized display modes: "壁纸多多", "找零工", "汇博招聘" [9].