Core Viewpoint - The Civil Aviation Administration of China has prohibited passengers from carrying power banks without 3C certification, leading to the emergence of counterfeit 3C certification stickers being sold by unscrupulous merchants, posing significant safety risks to consumers [1]. Group 1: Regulatory Context - The 3C certification is a mandatory product certification in China aimed at ensuring consumer safety, national security, and environmental protection [1]. - Since August 1 of the previous year, power banks without 3C certification are not allowed to be manufactured, sold, imported, or used in any business activities [1]. - The lack of 3C certification can lead to risks such as overheating, damage, and even fire or explosion [1]. Group 2: Market Response - The counterfeit 3C certification stickers reflect a misunderstanding of the legal implications by illegal merchants, who attempt to profit through improper means [1]. - The legitimate 3C certification includes a unique certification code that corresponds to the product model, manufacturer, and testing report, which can be verified through the official website of the National Certification and Accreditation Administration [1]. Group 3: Collaborative Efforts - To eliminate the counterfeiting of 3C labels, collaboration among regulatory authorities, e-commerce platforms, and consumers is essential [2]. - Regulatory bodies need to enforce stricter oversight on e-commerce platforms, enhance inspection efforts in the distribution chain, and impose penalties on counterfeit sellers [2]. - E-commerce platforms should strengthen their defenses by promptly removing illegal products, while consumers must resist counterfeit 3C certification stickers and take responsibility for their safety and public safety [2].

Core Viewpoint - The new regulation from the Civil Aviation Administration of China prohibits passengers from carrying power banks without 3C certification, aiming to enhance aviation safety and leading to increased consumer demand for compliant products [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Impact - The new regulation took effect on June 28, leading to a 13% increase in search interest for "power banks" and a surge in searches for "3C certified power banks" [1]. - Major brands like Baseus, Xiaomi, and Pisen dominate the sales rankings for compliant power banks [1]. Group 2: Market Response and Illegal Activities - The regulation has prompted some consumers to seek out counterfeit 3C certification stickers, with reports of their sale on major e-commerce platforms [1][2]. - Some sellers offer these fake stickers, claiming they can help customers pass airport security checks, indicating a market for illegal products [2]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The sale of counterfeit 3C certification stickers violates Chinese product quality laws and can lead to criminal charges, including imprisonment and fines for serious offenses [2]. - Buyers of fake stickers may also face legal consequences, including administrative penalties or civil liability if safety issues arise [2][3]. Group 4: E-commerce Platform Responsibility - E-commerce platforms may share liability if they fail to monitor and regulate the sale of counterfeit certification stickers [2].

Core Viewpoint - Recent safety incidents involving power banks have raised significant public concern, particularly regarding their transport on airplanes due to regulatory changes by the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) [1][4]. Regulatory Changes - On June 26, CAAC issued an emergency notice prohibiting travelers from carrying power banks without a 3C certification mark, unclear 3C marks, or recalled models on domestic flights starting June 28 [4]. - The enforcement of this regulation has led to widespread confiscation of non-compliant power banks at airports [1]. Market Response - Following the announcement, numerous online retailers were found selling 3C certification stickers, which could be purchased cheaply in bulk [4]. - Investigative reports revealed that many sellers confirmed the stickers could be applied to non-certified power banks, indicating a potential market for counterfeit certification [8]. Legal Implications - Legal experts have stated that selling 3C certification stickers constitutes a violation of the law, as it involves the forgery or alteration of certification marks [11]. - Consumers using these stickers on non-certified products could face legal repercussions for misrepresenting product safety [11]. Platform Responsibility - E-commerce platforms are obligated to maintain transaction order and product safety, and the sale of counterfeit 3C stickers poses a risk to consumer safety [12]. - Enhanced regulatory oversight by these platforms is essential to prevent the circulation of non-compliant products and protect consumer interests [12].

Core Viewpoint - The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) has issued an emergency notice prohibiting passengers from carrying power banks without 3C certification starting June 28, 2023, leading to a surge in illegal services offering fake 3C certification stickers [1][2][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The CAAC's notice aims to enhance passenger safety by enforcing the mandatory 3C certification for power banks, which is a compulsory market access system in China [2]. - Following the notice, numerous power banks were confiscated at airports for lacking the required 3C certification [2]. Group 2: Market Response - Some sellers on second-hand trading platforms have begun offering services to create fake 3C certification stickers, claiming that these can allow unapproved power banks to pass security checks [4][8]. - Investigations revealed that multiple platforms have started to remove listings for these illegal sticker services, although some remain available [9][12]. Group 3: Legal Implications - Legal experts have stated that selling 3C certification stickers constitutes a violation of Chinese law, specifically regarding the unauthorized use of certification marks [14]. - The law stipulates penalties for those who create or sell counterfeit certification marks, emphasizing the need for platforms to strengthen oversight to protect consumer interests [14].